Description of personality traits by Chinese adjectives: A trial on university students
Studies on personality-related Chinese adjectives suggest either a five-factor or seven-factor structure. In the current investigation, we selected a bigger adjective pool of personality-related adjectives, and tested them on the university students in Northern, Southern, Western and Eastern China. In Study 1, we administered the the self-rating scales of the 650 adjectives in 610 subjects. Five factors emerged clearly, and named as "Intelligent", "Emotional", Conscientious", "Unsocial" and "Agreeable". We then selected 20 adjectives with highest target loadings for each factor to develop a short version of the self-report rating scales, the Chinese Adjective Descriptors of Personality (CADP). In study 2, we administered the 100-adjective CADP to 720 university students in the four areas of China. Again, five-factor structures were confirmed. Loadings of the individual adjectives on the target factor were satisfactory, and the internal alphas for each personality scale were high. Most CADP scales were intercorrelated. There were, however, no significant gender differences in regard to CADP scales. The five-factor structures found in our report were comparable to the Openness to Experiences (or Intellect), Neuroticism, Conscientiousness, Extraversion and Agreeableness found in other cultures. The normative data of the CADP is presented.
Costa, P.T., Jr. & Widiger, T.A. (1994). Personality disorder and the five-factor model of personality. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Costa, P.T., Jr., Terracciano, A., & McCrae, R.R. (2001). Gender differences in personality traits acrss cultures: Rubost and surprising findings. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 322-331.
Craig, R.J. & Olson, R.E. (2001). Adjective descriptions of personality disorders: a convergent validity study of MCMI-III. Journal of Personality Assessment, 77, 259-271.
Cross, S.E. & Markus, H.R. (1999). The cultural constitution of personality. In L. Pervin, O. John (Eds.), Handbook of Personality, vol. 2 (pp. 376-396). New York: Guilford.
De Raad, B. (1992). The replicability of the big five personality dimensions in three word-classes of the Dutch language. European Journal of Personality, 6, 15-29.
De Raad, B. (2000). The Big Five personality factors: The psycholexical approach to personality. Gottingen: Hogrefe and Huber.
De Raad, B. & Barelds, D.P.H. (2008). A new taxonomy of Dutch personality traits based on a comprehensive and unrestricted list of descriptors. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94, 347-364.
Dunn, J.A., Zhang, X.Y., & Ripple, R.E. (1988). Comparative study of Chinese and American performance on divergent thinking tasks. New Horizons, 29, 7-20.
Goldberg, L.R. & Rosolack, T.K. (1994). The Big-Five structure as an integrated framework: An empirical comparison with Eysenck's P-E-N model. In C.F. Halverson, G.A. Kohnstamm, & R.P. Martin (Eds.), The developing structure of temperament and personality from infancy to adulthood (pp. 7-35). New York: Erlbaum.
Gomez, R. (2006). Gender invariance of the five-factor model of personality among adolescents: a mean and covariance structure analysis approach. Personality and Individual Differences, 41, 755-765.
Guenole, N., & Chernyshenko, O.S. (2005). The stability of Goldberg's Big Five IPIP personality markers in New Zealand: a dimensionality, bias, and criterion validity. New Zealand Journal of Psychology, 34, 86-96.
Hofstee, W.K.B. (1977). Preliminary steps in structuring the set of 1,204 Dutch personality-descriptive adjectives. Heymans Bulletins, HB-77-302 IN, University of Groningen.
John, O.P., Angleitner, A., & Ostendorf, F. (1988). The lexical approach to personality: a historical review of trait taxonomic research. European Journal of Personality, 2, 171-203.
Lee, K., and Ashton, M.C. (2008). The HEXACO personality factors in the indigenous personality lexicons of English and 11 other languages. Journal of Personality, 76, 1001-1054.
Leohlin, J.C., McCrae, R.R., Costa, P.T., Jr., & John, O.P. (1998). Heritabilities of common and measure specific components of the Big Five personality factors. Journal of Research in Personality, 32, 431-453.
McCrae, R.R. (2004). Human nature and culture: A trait perspective. Journal of Research in Personality, 38, 3-14.
McCrae, R.R. & Costa, P.T. Jr. (1996). Toward a new generation of personality theories: theoretical contexts for the five-factor model. In S. Wiggins (Ed.), The five-factor model of personality: Theoretical perspectives (pp. 51-87). New York: Guilford.
McCrae, R.R. & Costa, P.T. Jr. (1997). Personality trait structure as a human universal. American Psychologist, 52, 509-516.
Mlacic, B. & Ostendorf, F. (2005). Taxonomy and structure of Croatian personality-descriptive adjectives. European Journal of Personality, 19, 117-152.
Muris, P., Meesters, C., & Diederen, R. (2005). Psychometric properties of the Dutch big five questionnaire for children in a Dutch sample of young adolescents. Personality and Individual Differences, 38, 1757-1769.
Paunonen, S.V., Ashton, M.C., & Clark, D.N. (2001). Nonverbal assessment of the Big Five personality factors. European Journal of Personality, 15, 3-18.
Peabody, D. (1987) Selecting representative trait adjectives. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 59-71.
Poortinga, Y.H., van de Vijver, F., & van Hemert, D.A. (2002). Cross-culture equivalence of the Big Five: A tentative interpretation of the evidence. In R.R. McCrae & J. Allik (Eds.), The Five-Factor Model of personality across cultures (pp. 273-294). New York: Kluwer Academic Plenum Publishers.
Redding, G. & Wong, G.Y.Y. (1986). The psychology of Chinese organizational behavior. In M.H. Bond (Ed.), The psychology of the Chinese people (pp. 267-295). London: Oxford University Press.
Rudowicz, E. & Yue, X. (2002). Compatibility of Chinese and creative personalities. Creativity Research Journal, 14, 387-394.
Saucier, G. & Goldberg, L.R. (2001). Lexical studies of indigenous personality factors: premises, products, and prospects. Journal of Personality, 69, 847-879.
Shmelyov, A.G. & Pokhil'ko, V.I. (1993). A taxonomy-oriented study of Russian personality-trait names. European Journal of Personality, 7, 1-17.
Song, W. (1985). Analysis of results of MMPI of normal Chinese subjects. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 4, 346-355 (in Chinese).
Szarota, P. (1996). Taxonomy of the Polish personality-descriptive adjectives of the highest frequency of use. Polish Psychological Bulletin, 27, 343-351.
Wang, D. & Cui, H. (2004). Reliabilities and validities of the Chinese Personality Scale (QZPS). Acta Psychologica Sinica, 36, 347-358 (in Chinese).
Whitmore, J.M., Shore, W.J., & Smith, P.H. (2004). Partial knowledge of word meanings: thematic and taxonomic representations. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 33, 137-164.
Yang, K.S. (1990). Chinese personality and its change. In M.H. Bond (Ed.), The psychology of the Chinese people (pp. 106-170). Hong Kong: Oxford University Press.
Yang, K.S. & Bond, M.H. (1990). Exploring implicit personality theories with indigenous or imported constructs: The Chinese case. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 1087-1095.