Laparoscopic Adjustable Gastric Band (LAGB) Migration – Endoscopic Treatment Modalities

Open access


Laparoscopic adjustible gastric binding (LAGB) is one of most common surgical methods of treating obesity. Gastric band migration (erosion) is a typical LAGB complication, with a frequency of about 1-4%.

The aim of the study was to present the possibilities of endoscopic diagnosis and treatment of this complication.

Material and methods. The study was carried out in the Department of Gastroenterological, Oncological and General Surgery in Łódź. Between 2008 and 2015, 450 gastric bands were implanted using the laparoscopic technique in 318 (71%) women and 132 (29%) men. In this period 7 cases of band migration were diagnosed – 3 cases in men (2.3%) and 4 cases in women (1.3%), what presents 1.56% of general number of complications. Five out of 7 eroded bands were qualified for endoscopic removal. Four out of 5 qualified eroded bands were removed using the gastric band cutting technique. In one case we used the musculo-mucosal incision technique. In order to diagnose early perforations all patients underwent control passage examinations with oral contrast (gastrografin) 3-6 hours after the procedure.

Results. All 5 out of 5 qualified eroded gastric bands were successfully removed with the endoscopic method, which gives 100% success rate in own material. Two endoscopic methods were used: 1) endoscopic gastric band cutting, 2) endoscopic musculo-mucosal incision.

Conclusions. Endoscopy gives a possibility of instant diagnosis of gastric band migration and early minimally invasive treatment. One of our endoscopic methods of removing the bands by making several incisions of the musculo-mucosal plicae has not yet been described in professional medical literature.

1. „Obesity and overweight Fact sheet N°311”. WHO January 2015.

2. Biejat Z: Chirurgiczne leczenie otyłości. W: Chirurgia pod red. W. Noszczyka. Wydawnictwo Lekarskie PZWL, Warszawa 2009.

3. Frączek M, Krawczyk M: Operacyjne leczenie otyłości. W: Postawy Chirurgii pod red. J. Szmidta i J. Kużdżała. Med Prakt 2009.

4. Buchwald H, Oien DM: Metabolic/Bariatric Surgery Worldwide 2011. Obes Surg 2013; 23(4): 427-36.

5. Neto MPG, Ramos AC, Campo JM et al.: Endoscopic removal of eroded adjustible gastric band: lessons learned after 5 years and 78 cases. Surg Obesity and Related Dis 2010; 423-28.

6. Yildiz BD, Bostanoglu A, Sonisik M et al: Long Term Efficacy of Laparoscopic Adjustable Gastric Banding-Retrospective Analysis. Adv Clin Exp Med 2012; 21(5): 615-19.

7. Cobourn C, Chapman MA, Ali A, Amrhein J: Five-Year Weight Loss Experience of Outpatients Receiving Laparoscopic Adjustible Gastric Band Surgery. Obes Surg 2013; 23: 903-10.

8. Razak H, Dadan J, Sołdatow M et al.: Complications after laparoscopic gastric banding in own material. Videosurg Miniinv 2012; 7(3): 166-74.

9. Kodner C, Hartman DR: Complications of Adjustable Gastric banding Surgery for Obesity. Amer Family Physician 2014; 89(10).

10. Aarts EO, Van Wageningen B, Berends F et al.: Intragastric band erosion: Experiences with gastrointestinal endoskopic remowal. World J Gastroenterol 2015; 21(5): 1567-72.

11. Dogan UB, Akin MS, Yalaki S et al.: Endoscopic managment of gastric band erosions: a 7-year series of 14 patients. Can J Surg. 2014; 57(2).

12. Miller K, Hell E: Laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding: a prospective 4-year folow-up study. Obes Surg 1999; 9: 183-87.

13. Westing A, Bjurling K, Ohrvall M et al.: Silicone adjustable gastric banding: disappointing results. Obes Surg 1998; 8: 467-74.

14. Oliver JL, Amigo SV, Garcia JS et al.: Adjustable Gastric Band as Surgical Treatment for Morbid Obesity. Are Worldwide Results Reproducible in Spain? Cir Esp 2013;91(5): 301-07

15. Puzziferri N, Roshek TB II, Mayo HG et al.: Long-term Follow-up After Bariatric Surgery: A Systematic Review. JAMA 2014; 312(9): 934-42.

16. Himpens J, Cadiere GB, Bazi M et al.: Long-term Outcomes of Laparoscopic Adjustable Gastric Banding. Arch Surg 2011; 146(7): 802-07.

17. Korenkov M: Bariatric Surgery: Technical Variations and Complications. Springer Science & Business Media, 14.12.2011 – 217.

Polish Journal of Surgery

The Journal of Foundation of the Polish Journal of Surgery

Journal Information

CiteScore 2016: 0.29

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2016: 0.166
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2016: 0.207


All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 181 181 32
PDF Downloads 72 72 16