The usefulness of anorectal manometry in patients with a stoma before and after surgery to restore the continuity of the gastrointestinal tract

Open access

Abstract

The operation to restore the continuity of the gastrointestinal tract is another surgical intervention in a given patient, which directly translates into an increased risk of complications during and after surgery. That is why proper qualification is important for the operation to restore the continuity of the gastrointestinal tract in terms of performance and efficiency of the anal sphincter apparatus, among other things.

The aim of the study was to evaluate the effect of restoring physiological defecation routes on the sphincter function and to observe the parameters of anorectal manometry in patients before and after surgery to restore the continuity of the gastrointestinal tract.

Material and methods. The study included 29 patients scheduled for restoration of the continuity of the gastrointestinal tract, 12 women and 17 men. The average age in the group was 62 years. Anorectal manometry was performed both before surgery as well as one month and three months afterwards in all patients. The average time to have a stoma was 12 months.

Results. The resting pressure in the anal canal (MRP) three months after the restoration of the continuity of the gastrointestinal tract increased by 30.4%. The maximum systolic blood pressure in the anal canal (MSP) increased by 22.2%. The value of recto-anal inhibitory reflex (RAIR) decreased by 19.2%. The length of the high pressure zone in the anal canal (HPZL) increased by 27%. The study results of visceral rectal sensation thresholds decreased by 23.3% for the sensation threshold, and 14.4% for the pressure threshold.

Conclusions. Restoring the continuity of the gastrointestinal tract improves the anal sphincter function which is evident in the parameters of anorectal manometry. The restoration of passage improves the sphincter function, and these changes are statistically significant.

1. Jie-Hyun Kim, MD, PhD: How to Interpret Conventional Anorectal Manometry. J. Neurogastroenterol. Motil 2010; 16; 4: 437-39.

2. Sun WM, Rao SS : Manometric assessment of anorectal function. Gastroenterol Clin North Am 2001; 30: 15-32.

3. Jorge JM, Wexner SD: Anorectal manometry: techniques and clinical applications. South Med J 1993; 86: 924-31.

4. Scott SM, Gladman MA : Manometric, sensorimotor and neurophysiologic evaluation of anorectal function. Gastroenterol Clin North Am 2008; 37(3): 511-38.

5. Law WL, Chu KW, Choi HK: Randomized clinical trial comparing loop ileostomy and loop transverse colostomy for faecal diversion following total mesorectal excision. Br J Surg 2002; 89: 704-08.

6. Bruce J, Krukowski ZH et.al.: Systematic review of the definition and measurement of anastomotic leak after gastrointestinal surgery. Br J Surg 2001; 88: 1157-68.

7. Rahbari NN, Weitz J et. al.: Definition and grading of anastomotic leakage following anterior resection of the rectum: a proposal by the international Study Group of Rectal Cancer. Surgery 2010; 147: 339-51.

8. Hyman N, Manchester TL et. al.: Anastomotic leaks after intestinal anastomosis: it's later than you think. Ann Surg 2007; 245: 254-58.

9. Hill J, Hosker G, Kiff ES : Pudendal nerve terminal motor latency measurements: what they do and do not tell us. Br J Surg 2002; 89: 1268-69.

10. Herman RM, Wałęga P, Widera A: Biofeedback jako zachowawcza metoda leczenia nietrzymania stolca. Pol Przegl Lek 2004; 1.

11. Rao SS, Singh S: Clinical utility of colonic and anorectal manometry in chronic constipation. J Clin Gastroenterol 2010; 44: 597-609.

12. Raza N, Bielefeldt K: Discriminative value of anorectal manometry in clinical practice. Dig Dis Sci 2009; 54: 2503-11.

13. Herman RM, Wałęga P, Sobocki J i wsp.: Nowoczesna diagnostyka i możliwości leczenia nietrzymania stolca. Postępy Nauk Med 2006; XIX(5): 216-34.

14. Silvis R et al.: Endosonography of the anal sphincter after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis. Dis Colon Rectum 1995; 38: 383.

15. Kobakov G, Kostov D, Temelkov T: Manometric study in ulcerative colitis patients with modified ileal pouch-anal anastomosis. Int J Colorectal Dis 2006; 21(8): 767-73.

16. Saigusa N, Belin BM, Choi HJ et al.: Recovery of the rectoanal inhibitory reflex after restorative proctocolectomy: does it correlate with nocturnal continence? Dis Colon Rectum 2003; 46: 168-72.

17. Sudoł-Szopińska I, Szczepkowski M, Jakubowski W, Panorska A: Przydatność endosonografii u osób z wytworzonym odbytem brzusznym przed decyzją o wykonaniu operacji odtwórczej. Pol Merk Lek 2002; XIII; 78: 484-86.

Polish Journal of Surgery

The Journal of Foundation of the Polish Journal of Surgery

Journal Information


CiteScore 2016: 0.29

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2016: 0.166
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2016: 0.207

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 127 127 6
PDF Downloads 55 55 3