Patients’ Awareness Of The Prevention And Treatment Of Colorectal Cancer

Open access

Abstract

The aim of the study was to assess patients’ awareness of the prevention and treatment of colorectal cancer.

Material and methods. Patients diagnosed with colorectal cancer, hospitalised at the Department of General and Colorectal Surgery of the Medical University in Łódź during the period from January 2015 to April 2015, were asked to complete a questionnaire concerning their families’ medical case record, factors predisposing them to the development of colorectal cancer, the tests applied in diagnostics, and the treatment process. The questionnaire comprised 42 closed-ended questions with one correct answer. A statistical analysis of all answers was carried out.

Results. The study group consisted of 30 men and 20 women aged 27–94 years old. A strong, statistically significant negative correlation between a patient’s age and his/her awareness of the prevention and treatment of colorectal cancer was noted (p<0.001; r= −0.51). The study demonstrated a statistically significant relationship between the occurrence of neoplasms in a patient’s family (p=0.009) or, more specifically, the occurrence of colorectal cancer (p=0.008), and the awareness of the prevention programme. The women’s group was characterised by statistically significantly greater awareness of colonoscopy as a screening examination (p=0.004).

Conclusions. Patients need more information on colorectal cancer, its risk factors, prevention, the treatment process, and postoperative care. Lack of awareness of the colorectal cancer issue can be one of the major factors contributing to the high incidence of this disease.

1. Potemski P: Epidemiologia, badania przesiewowe i klasyfikacja zaawansowania klinicznego raka jelita grubego. Onkologia w Praktyce Klinicznej 2010; 6: 283-89.

2. Haggar FA, Boushey RP: Colorectal cancer epidemiology: incidence, mortality, survival, and risk factors. Clin Colon Rectal Surg 2009; 22: 191-97.

3. Labianca R, Nordlinger B, Beretta GD et al.: Early colon cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol 2013; 24 Suppl 6: vi64-72.

4. Owusu D, Quinn M, Wang KS: Alcohol Consumption, Depression, Insomnia and Colorectal Cancer Screening: Racial Differences. Int J High Risk Behav Addict 2015; 4(2): e23424.

5. Zubaidi AM, Al Subaie NM, Al Humaid AA et al.: Public awareness of colorectal cancer in Saudi Arabia: A survey of 1070 participants in Riyadh. Saudi J Gastroenterol 2015; 21(2): 78-83.

6. Khayyat YM, Ibrahim EM: Public awareness of colon cancer screening among the general population: A study from the Western Region of Saudi Arabia. Qatar Med J 2014; 16(1): 17-24.

7. Tam TK, Ng KK, Lau CM et al.: Faecaloccult blood screening: knowledge, attitudes, and practice in four Hong Kong primary careclinics. Hong Kong Med J 2011; 17(5): 350-57.

8. Kwiatkowski F, Dessenne P, Laquet C et al.: Permanence of the information given during oncogenetic counseling to personsat familial risk of breast/ovarian and/or colon cancer. Eur J Hum Genet 2012; 20(2): 141-47.

9. Yim M, Butterly LF, Goodrich ME et al.: Perception of colonoscopy benefits: a gap in patient knowledge? J Community Health 2012; 37(3): 719-24.

10. Chong VH: Gender preference and implications for screening colonoscopy: impact of endoscopy nurses. World J Gastroenterol 2012; 18(27): 3590-94.

11. Davis TC, Rademaker A, Bailey SC et al.: Contrasts in rural and urban barriers to colorectal cancer screening. Am J Health Behav 2013; 37(3): 289-98.

12. Nawaz H, Via C, Shahrokni A et al.: Can the Inpatient Hospital Setting Be a Golden Opportunity to Improve Colon Cancer Screening Rates in the United States? Health Promot Pract 2014; 15(4): 506-11.

13. Wasserman M, Baxter NN, Rosen B et al.: Systematic review of internet patient information on colorectal cancer surgery. Dis Colon Rectum 2014; 57(1): 64-69.

14. Lee CJ, Ramírez AS, Lewis N et al.: Looking beyond the Internet: examining socioeconomic inequalities in cancer information seeking among cancer patients. Health Commun 2012; 27(8): 806-17.

15. Hassinger JP, Holubar SD, Pendlimari R et al.: Effectiveness of a multimedia-based educational intervention for improving colon cancer literacy in screening colonoscopy patients. Dis Colon Rectum 2010; 53(9): 1301-07.

16. Levy BT, Daly JM, Xu Y et al.: Mailed fecal immunochemical tests plus educational materials to improve colon cancer screening rates in Iowa Research Network (IRENE) practices. J Am Board Fam Med 2012; 25(1): 73-82.

17. White PM, Sahu M, Poles MA et al.: Colorectal cancer screening of high-risk populations: A national survey of physicians. BMC Res Notes 2012; 5: 64.

18. Kelly KM, Love MM, Pearce KA et al.: Cancer risk assessment by rural and Appalachian family medicine physicians, J Rural Health 2009; 25(4): 372-77.

19. Potosky AL, Han PK, Rowland J et al.: Differences between primary care physicians’ and oncologists’ knowledge, attitudes and practices regarding the care of cancer survivors. J Gen Intern Med 2011; 26(12): 1403-10.

20. Ziegler M, Krause S, Kolligs FT: Ärztliche Aufklärung über Darmkrebs und Darmkrebsvorsorge. Z Gastroenterol 2011; 49(5): 584-90.

21. Feldman MJ, Hoffer EP, Barnett GO et al.: Presence of key findings in the medical record prior to a documented high-risk diagnosis. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2012; 19(4): 591-96.

22. Lobchuk MM, Bapuji SB, McClement SE et al.: What is the role of family in promoting faecal occult blood test screening? Exploring physician, averagerisk individual, and family perceptions. Cancer Epidemiol 2012; 36(3): e190-99.

23. Lawsin C, Duhamel K, Itzkowitz S et al.: An examination of the psychosocial factors influencing colorectal cancer patients’ communication of colorectal cancer patient risk with their siblings. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2009; 18(11): 2907-12.

24. Parker AS, Arnold ML, Diehl ND et al.: Evaluation of awareness of risk factors for kidney cancer among patients presenting to a urology clinic. Scand J Urol 2014; 48(3): 239-44.

25. Podsakoff PM, MacKenzie SB, Lee JY et al.: Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. J Appl Psychol 2003; 88(5): 879-903.

Polish Journal of Surgery

The Journal of Foundation of the Polish Journal of Surgery

Journal Information


CiteScore 2016: 0.29

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2016: 0.166
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2016: 0.207

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 142 142 13
PDF Downloads 67 67 7