Elective Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy – Is It Safe In The Hands Of Residents During Training?

Open access

Abstract

The aim of the study was to assess safety of elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) performed by residents that are undergoing training in general surgery.

Material and methods. A retrospective analysis was conducted on 330 patients operated electively due to cholelithiasis. Patients with acute cholecystitis, choledocholithiasis, undergoing cholecystec-tomy as a part of more extensive operation and patients with gall-bladder cancer were excluded. Group 1 included patients operated by resident, group 2 – by specialist. Duration of operation, mean blood loss, number of major complications, number of conversions to the open technique and conversions of the operator, reoperations and length of hospital stay were analyzed.

Results. Mean operative time overall was 81 min (25 – 170, SD±28.6) and 71 min (30-210, SD±29.1) in groups 1 and 2 respectively (p=0.00009). Mean blood loss in group 1 was 45±68.2 ml and in group 2 – 41±73.4 ml (p=0.23). Six major complications has occurred (1.81%) – 2 (2%) in group 1 and 4 (1.7%) in group 2. 18 cases (15.5%) of conversion of the operator occurred in group 1, and 6 cases (2.6%) of conversion of the operator happened in group 2. Average LOS was 1.9 days in group 1 and 2.3 days in group 2 (p=0.03979).

Conlcusions. Elective LC performed by a supervised resident is a safe procedure. Tactics of “conversion of operator” allowed to prevent major complications. Longer LC by residents is natural during the learning curve. Modifications of residency program in the field of laparoscopy may increase its accessibility.

1. Begos DG, Modlin IM: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy: from gimmick to gold standard. J Clin Gastroenterol 1994 Dec; 19 (4): 325-30.

2. Sefr R, Penka I, Olivero R et al.: The impact of laparoendoscopic surgery on the training of surgical residents. Int Surg 1995 Oct-Dec; 80 (4): 358-60.

3. Clavien PA, Barkun J, de Oliveira M et al.: The Clavien-Dindo classification of surgical complications: five-year experience. Ann Surg 2009 Aug; 250 (2): 187-96.

4. Agha R, Muir G: Does laparoscopic surgery spell the end of the open surgeon? J Royal Society of Med 2003; 96 (11): 544-46.

5. Lorenzon L, La Torre M, Ziparo V et al.: Evidence based medicine and surgical approaches for colon cancer: Evidences, benefits and limitations of the laparoscopic vs open resection. World J Gastroenterol 2014; 20 (13): 3680-92.

6. Van der Pas M, Haglind E, Cuesta MA et al.: Laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer (COLOR II): short-term outcomes of a randomised, phase 3 trial – Colorectal cancer Laparoscopic or Open Resection II (COLOR II) Study Group. Lancet Oncol 2013 March; 14 (3): 210-18.

7. Michalik M: Występ na Konferencji „Medycyna Praktyczna – Chirurgia 2015”, Kraków 16.05.2015. „Dlaczego laparoskopia w chirurgii onkologicznej przewodu pokarmowego szkodzi”.

8. De Win G, Everaerts W, De Ridder D et al.: Laparoscopy training in Belgium: results from a nationwide survey, in urology, gynecology, and generalsurgery residents. Adv Med Educ Pract 2015 Jan 30; 6: 55-63.

9. Qureshi A, Vergis A, Jimenez C et al.: MIS training in Canada: a national survey of general surgery residents. Surg Endosc 2011 Sep; 25 (9): 3057-65.

10. Moore MJ, Bennett CL: The learning curve for laparoscopic cholecystectomy. The Southern Surgeons Club. Am J Surg 1995 Jul; 170 (1): 55-59.

11. Voitik AJ, Tsao SG, Ignatius S: The tail of the learning curve for laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Am J Surg 2001, Sep; 182 (3): 250-53.

12. Fahrner R., Turina M., Neuhaus V et al.: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy as a teaching operation: comparison of outcome between residents and attending surgeons in 1,747 patients. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2012 Jan; 397 (1): 103-10.

13. Uecker J, Luftman K, Ali S et al.: Comparable operative times with and without surgery resident participation. Surg Educ 2013 Nov-Dec; 70 (6): 696-99.

14. Pariani D, Fontana S, Zetti G et al.: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy performed by residents: a retrospective study on 569 patients. Surg Res Pract 2014; 2014: 912143.

15. Anderson K, Jupiter DC, Abernathy SW et al.: Shouldclopidogrel be discontinued before laparoscopic cholecystectomy? Am J Surg 2014 Dec; 208 (6): 926-31; discussion 930-1. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2014.08.001. Epub 2014 Sep 20

16. Wirkowski A, Pesta W: Pułapki cholecystektomii laparoskopowej – doświadczenia własne. Wideochirurgia i inne techniki małoinwazyjne 2008; 3 (4): 179-85.

17. Vivek MAKM, Augustine AJ, Rao R: A comprehensive predictive scoring method for difficult laparoscopic cholecystectomy. J Minimal Access Surgery 2014; 10 (2): 62-67. doi: 10.4103/0972-9941.129947.

18. Gurusamy KS, Nagendran M, Toon C et al.: Laparoscopic surgical box model training for surgical trainees with limited prior laparoscopic experience. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2014 Mar 1; 3: CD010478.

19. Nagendran M, Toon CD, Davidson BR et al.: Laparoscopic surgical box model training for surgical trainees with no prior laparoscopic experience. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2014 Jan 17; 1: CD010479.

20. Gurusamy KS, Aggarwal R, Palanivelu et al.: Virtual reality training for surgicaltrainees in laparoscopic surgery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2009 Jan 21; (1): CD006575.

21. Giannotti D, Patrizi G, Di Rocco G: Play to become a surgeon: impact of Nintendo Wii training on laparoscopic skills. PLoS One 2013; 8 (2): e57372.

Polish Journal of Surgery

The Journal of Foundation of the Polish Journal of Surgery

Journal Information


CiteScore 2016: 0.29

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2016: 0.166
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2016: 0.207

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 198 104 12
PDF Downloads 100 69 6