Protective Stomy as a Complement to Anterior Rectal Resection. Analysis of Authors' Material and Literature Review
Anastomotic leak after anterior rectal resection for cancer is one of the most dangerous complications of the procedure. Protective stomy is a way to avoid life-threatening consequences of this complication. The procedure is still under evaluation.
The aim of the study was to evaluate the usefulness of forming a protective stomy as part of anterior rectal cancer resection on the basis of an analysis of the authors' material.
Material and methods. In 2008 - 2009, we treated 111 patients with rectal cancer. Thirty-two of those patients received preoperative radio(chemo)therapy. Eighty-four patients (76%) underwent resection of the primary tumour. In 20 patients (24%), we performed abdominoperineal or abdominosacral resection; in 6 (7%) cases the Hartmann procedure was used and in 58 (69%) cases anterior rectal resection was performed. In 53 of 58 cases, the resections were assessed as curative and in 5 as palliative. In 18 of 58 (31%) patients, anterior resections were defined as low anterior resections. Twelve (67%) of these patients were subjected to preoperative radio(chemo)therapy. Two of 58 patients, who underwent anterior resection, had been treated by stomy creation before the radical procedure. One of them required neoadjuvant radiotherapy. In the second patient with the stomy, we restored the intestinal continuity during the primary tumour resection. Among the remaining 40 patients, only one underwent protective stomy creation during the resective procedure. This patient did not require preoperative radiotherapy.
Results. We have not found any clinical indications of anastomotic leak in the analysed group of 58 patients subjected to anterior rectal resection for cancer.
Conclusions. Our modest experience reaffirms our conviction that anterior rectal cancer resection does not require routine protective stomy creation, also when low anterior resection follows preoperative radiotherapy.
Tan WS, Tang CL, Shi L, et al.: Meta-analysis of defunctioning stomas in low anterior resection for rectal cancer. Br J Surg 2009; 96: 462-72.
Buchs NC, Gervaz P, Secic M, et al.: Incidence, consequences, and risk factors for anastomotic dehiscence after colorectal surgery: a prospective monocentric study. Int J Colorectal Dis 2008; 23: 265-70.
Lefebure B, Tuech JJ, Bridoux V, et al.: Evaluation of selective defunctioning stoma after low anterior resection for rectal cancer. Int J Colorectal Dis 2008; 23: 283-88.
Dulk M, Marijnen CAM, Collette L, et al.: Multicentre analysis of oncological and survival outcomes following anastomotic leakage after rectal cancer surgery. Br J Surg 2009; 96: 1066-75.
Lustosa SA, Matos D, Atallah AN, et al.: Stapled versus handsewn methods for colorectal anastomosis surgery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2001; 3: CD003144.
Jesus EC, Karliczek A, Matos D, et al.: Prophylactic anastomotic drainage for colorectal surgery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2004; 4: CD002100.
Ricciardi R, Roberts PL, Marcello PW, et al.: Anastomotic leak testing after colorectal resection; what are the data? Arch Surg 2009; 144: 407-11.
Meyerhardt JA, Tepper JE, Niedźwiecki D, et al.: Impact of hospital procedure volume on surgical operation and long-term outcomes in high-risk curatively resected rectal cancer: findings from the Intergroup 0114 Study. J Clin Oncol 2004; 22: 166-74.
Wibe A, Syse A, Andersen E, et al.: Oncological outcomes after total mesorectal excision for cure for cancer of the lower rectum: anterior vs. abdominoperineal resection. Dis Colon Rectum 2004; 47: 48-58.
Ho Y-H, Ashour MAT: Techniques for colorectal anastomosis. World J Gastroenterol 2010; 16: 1610-21.
Rondelli F, Reboldi P, Rulli A, et al.: Loop ileostomy versus loop colostomy for fecal diversion after colorectal or coloanal anastomosis: a metaanalysis. Int J Colorectal Dis 2009; 24: 479-88.
Akiyoshi T, Fujimoto Y, Konishi T, et al.: Complications of loop ileostomy closure in patients with rectal tumor. World J Surg 2010; 34: 1937-42.