An Analysis of Factors Influencing Accuracy of the Diagnosis of Acute Appendicitis
The aim of the study was to "refresh" the knowledge about the course of acute appendicitis, to confront the classical clinical picture with the practice, analyze its fluctuations and identify factors influencing these.
Material and methods. All patients admitted to the Department of General Surgery in Grudziądz District Hospital with the suspicion of acute appendicitis, who underwent appendectomy and in whom the appendicitis was confirmed in pathologic examination were included in the study. There were 85 patients, 49 men (58%) and 36 women (42%) in a mean age of 30 years (range 10-75). Symptoms, signs and results of biochemical tests (leukocyte rate and CRP) were considered in the analysis.
Results. The commonest constellation of symptoms and signs, occurring in at least of 3/4 patients consisted of pain and tenderness localized in right lower quadrant (100%), which exacerbates at movements (98%), felling unwell (93%), loss of appetite (88%), and rebound tenderness in right lower quadrant (74%).
Conclusions. No particular fluctuation of clinical features in relation to gender, age, duration of symptoms, biochemical parameters and morphological severity of the inflammation was observed. Relevant findings included relatively fast development (<12 hrs) of advanced appendicitis in 18% of adult patients and more than a half patients with normal body temperature, regardless true appendicitis.
Żyluk A, Ostrowski P: Rozpoznawanie ostrego zapalenia wyrostka robaczkowego - przegląd piśmiennictwa. Pol Przegl Chir 2010; 5(82); 517-34.
Rao PM, Rhea JT, Novelline RA, et al.: Helical CT technique for the diagnosis of appendicitis: prospective evaluation of focused appendix CT examination. Radiology 1997; 202: 139-44.
Stroman DL, Bayouth CV, Kuhn JA, et al.: The role of computed tomography in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis. Am J Surg 1999; 178: 485-89.
Jones FP: Suspected acute appendicitis: trends in management over 30 years. Br J Surg 2001; 88: 1570-77.
Anderson RE: Meta-analysis of the clinical and laboratory diagnosis of appendicitis. Br J Surg 2004; 91: 28-37.
Ohmann C, Franke C, Yang Q: Clinical benefit of a diagnostic score for appendicitis. Arch Surg 1999; 134: 993-96.
Fenyo G, Lindberg G, Blind P, et al.: Diagnostic decision support in suspected acute appendicitis: validation of simplified scoring system. Eur J Surg 1997; 163: 831-38.
Anderson RE, Hugander AP, Ghazi SH, et al.: Diagnostic value of disease history, clinical presentation and inflammatory parameters of appendicitis. World J Surg 1999; 23: 133-40.
Anderson RE, Hugander AP, Ravn H, et al.: Repeated clinical and laboratory examinations in patients with an equivocal diagnosis of appendicitis. World J Surg 2000; 24: 479-85.
Ferguson CM: Acute appendicitis. W: Morris PJ, Malt RA (red.). Oxford textbook of surgery, vol. 1. Oxford University Press, Oxford 1994, str. 1113-17.
Anderson RE: The natural history and traditional management of appendicitis revisited: spontaneous resolution and predominance of prehospital perforations imply that a correct diagnosis is more important than an early diagnosis. World J. Surg 2007; 31: 86-92.
Alvorado A: A practical score for the early diagnosis of acute appendicitis. Ann Emerg Med 1986; 15: 57-64.
Izbicki JR, Knoefel WF, Wilker DK, et al.: Accurate diagnosis of acute appendicitis: a retrospective and prospective analysis of 686 patients. Eur J Surg 1992; 158: 227-31.
Anderson M, Anderson RE: The appendicitis inflammatory response score: a tool for the diagnosis of acute appendicitis that outperforms the Alvorado score. World J Surg 2008; 32: 1843-49.
Wagner JM, McKinney WP, Carpenter JL: Does this patient have appendicitis? JAMA 1996; 276: 1589-1594.
Jones PF: Active observation in the management of acute abdominal pain in children. BMJ 1976; ii: 551-553.
Wilcox RT, Traverso LW: Have the evaluation and treatment of acute appendicitis changed with new technology? Surg Clin North Am 1997; 77: 1355-70.
Korner H, Sondenaa K, Soreide JA, et al.: The history is important in patients with suspected acute appendicitis. Dig Surg 2000; 17: 364-69.
Vermeulen B, Morabia A, Unger P-F: Influence of white cells count on surgical decision making in patients with abdominal pain in right lower quadrant. Eur J Surg 1995; 161: 483-91.
Gurleyik E, Gurleyik G, Unalmiser S: Accuracy of serum C-reactive protein measurements in diagnosis of acute appendicitis compared with surgeon's clinical impression. Dis Colon Rectum 1995; 38: 1270-78.
Eriksson S, Granstrom L, Calstrom A: The diagnostic value of repetitive preoperative analysis of C-reactive protein and total leukocytes count in patients with suspected acute appendicitis. Scand J Gastroenterol 1994; 29: 1145-50.
Anderson R, Hugander A, Thulin A, et al.: Indications for operation in suspected appendicitis and incidence of perforation. BMJ 1994; 308: 107-10.
Migraine S, Atri M, Bret PM, et al.: Spontaneously resolving appendicitis: clinical and sonographic documentation. Radiology 1997; 205: 55-58.
Kirschenbaum M, Mishra V, Kuo D, et al.: Resolving appendicitis: role of CT. Abdom Imaging 2003; 28: 276-79.