Need Assessment for Gastroscopy in Patients with Gall-Stones
Cholelithiasis (gall-stones) occurs in 13% of the Polish population. Patients affected with gall-stones notify non-specific symptoms caused by pathology of the upper segment of the digestive track which coexists with gall-stones.
The aim of the study was to analyze the risk of occurrence of pathological changes, within the part of the digestive track in patients affected with gall-stones, to assess the correlation between data of medical histories of patients and results of gastroscopy based diagnosis; to devise tactics of alterations to the planned measures in case a clinically significant disease has been diagnosed.
Material and methods. The study group comprised 615 patients, qualified for cholecystectomy, with symptomatic gall-stones, verified by an ultrasound diagnosis. After being interviewed and examined, all the patients were subjected to gastroscopy, and when necessary biopsy was performed. The statistical analysis was performed using an multifactorial analysis (Pearson's correlation coefficient for categorical variables).
Results. Among 615 patients, the subjects in the study, we found 183 ones (29.7%) with a normal upper digestive tract, we found pathology of the upper digestive system in 70.3% cases (432 patients). Serious pathology resulting in changing the planned treatment was found in 83 patients (13.5%): among those four ones had gastric carcinoma, sixty-three ones suffering from chronic peptic ulcer disease (gastric or/and duodenal), twelve patients were affected with hemorrhagic gastritis, four patients had GERD C and D. In a group of 83 patients cholocystectomy was postponed and the diagnosed disease was treated. Four patients were operated on because of gastric cancer, with intention of cure.
Conclusions. 1. Routine gastroscopy performed before cholecystectomy is justified. The percentage of abnormalities diagnosed during gastroscopy proved the above mentioned thesis. 2. Medical histories and an object examination do not allow to state explicitly that there is another disease of the upper part of the digestive system which coexists with gall-stones. In case of diagnosing the other pathology it is necessary to take into consideration an alteration of tactics of management: to delay an operation and treat the other disease which has been diagnosed.
Schwenk W, Bohm B, Badke A et al.: Preoperative esophagogastroduodenoscopy before elective surgical therapy of symptomatic cholelithiasis. Leber Magen Darm 1992; 22: 225-29.
Beyermann K, Stinner B, Hasselmann U et al.: Consequences of routine gastroscopy before cholecystectomy. Langenbecks Arch Chir 1992; 377: 314-16.
Ure BM, Troidl H, Spangenberger W et al.: Evaluation of routine upper digestive tract endoscopy before laparoscopic cholecystectomy Br J Surg 1992; 79: 1174-77.
Niv Y, Fraser GM: Is there a need for diagnostic upper gastrointestinal endoscopy before cholecystectomy? Isr J Med Sci 1995; 31: 536-39.
Głuszek S, Kot M, Wawrzeńczyk U: Przydatność endoskopii górnego odcinka przewodu pokarmowego przed kwalifikacja do cholecystektomii laparoskopowej. Videochirurgia 1996; 1,2: 18-20.
Thybusch A, Schaube H, Schweizer E et al.: Significant value and therapeutic implications of routine gastroscopy before cholecystectomy. J Chir 1996; 133: 171-74.
Głuszek S, Czerwaty M: Jak zmniejszyć ryzyko przeoczenia nowotworu u pacjentów poddawanych cholecystektomii laparoskopowej? Pol Przegl Chir 1998; 70(11): 1153-57.
Głuszek S, Czerwaty M, Kot M: Zasady postępowania z chorymi kwalifikowanymi do cholecystektomii laparoskopowej, zmniejszające ryzyko przeoczenia nowotworu. Videochirugia 1999; 2,3: 8-10.
Fahlke J, Ridwelski K, Manger T et al.: Diagnostic workup before laparoscopic cholecystectomy - which diagnostic tools should be used? Hepatogastroenterology 2001; 48: 59-65.
Sosada K, Zurawiński W, Piecuch J et al.: Gastroduodenoscopy: a routine examination of 2,800 patients before laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 2005; 19: 1103-08.
Shaheen N, Ransohoff DF: Gastroesophageal reflux, barrett esophagus, and esophageal cancer: scientific review. JAMA 2002; 287: 1972-81.
Dixon MF, Genta RM, Yardley JH et al.: Classification and grading of gastritis. The updated Sydney System. International Workshop on the Histopathology of Gastritis, Houston 1994. Am J Surg Pathol 1996; 20: 1161-81.
Lundell LR, Dent J, Bennett JR et al.: Endoscopic assessment of oesophagitis: clinical and functional correlates and further validation of the Los Angeles classification. Gut 1999; 45: 172-80.
Maratka Z: The OMED data base: standard for nomenclature. Endoscopy 1992; 24 Suppl 2: 455-56.
Heldwein W, Schreiner J, Pedrazzoli J et al.: Is the Forrest classification a useful tool for planning endoscopic therapy of bleeding peptic ulcers? Endoscopy 1989; 21: 258-62.
Morson BC: The Japanese classification of early gastric cancer. Monogr Pathol 1977; 18:176-83.
Espejo Romero H, Navarrete Siancas J: Classification of stomach adenocarcinomas. Rev Gastroenterol Peru 2003; 23: 199-212.
Moczko A, Bręborowicz GH, Tadeusiewicz R: Statystyka w badaniach medycznych. Springer PWN, Warszawa 1998.
Maniecka-Bryła I, Martini-Fiwek J: Epidemiologia z elementami biostatyki. WUM Łódź 2005.
Wegge C, Kjaergaard J: Evaluation of symptoms and signs of gallstone disease in patients admitted with upper abdominal pain. Scand J Gastroenterol 1985; 20: 933-36.