Evaluation of jaws-only intensity modulated radiation therapy treatment plans using Octavius 4D system

Open access


Introduction: Jaws-Only Intensity modulated radiation therapy (JO-IMRT) is a technique uses the collimator jaws of the linear accelerator (LINAC) to delivery of complex intensity patterns. In previous studies, pretreatment patient specific quality assurance for those JO-IMRT were also performed using ionization chamber, MapCHECK2, and Octavius 4D and good agreements were shown. The aim of this study is to further verify JO-IMRT plans in 2 different cases: one with the gantry angle set equal to beam angle as in the plans and the other with gantry angle set to zero degree.

Materials and Methods: Twenty-five JO-IMRT, previously verified, were executed twice for each plan. The first one used a real gantry angle, and the second one used a 0° gantry angle. Measurements were performed using Octavius 4D 1500.

Results: The results were analyzed using Verisoft software. The results show that the Gamma average was 97.32 ± 2.21% for IMRT with a 0° gantry angle and 94.72 ± 2.67% for IMRT with a true gantry angle.

Conclusion: In both cases, gamma index of more than 90% were found for all of our 25 JO-IMRT treatment plans.

[1] Webb S. Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy. Taylor & Francis Ltd. 2001.

[2] Nishimura Y, Komaki R. Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy: Clinical Evidence and Techniques. Springer. 2015; 22-27.

[3] Webb S. Optimization by simulated annealing of three-dimensional, conformal treatment planning for radiation fields defined by a multileaf collimator: II. Inclusion of two- dimensional modulation of the X-ray intensity. Phys Med Biol. 1992;37(8):1689-1704.

[4] Jeraj M, Robar V. Multileaf collimator in radiotherapy. Radiol Oncol. 2004;38(3):235-240.

[5] Yang J, Li J, Chen L, et al. Dosimetric verification of IMRT treatment planning using Monte Carlo simulations for prostate cancer. Phys Med Biol. 2005;50(5):869-878.

[6] Arnfield MR, Siebers JV, Kim JO, et al. A method for determining multileaf collimator transmission and scatter for dynamic intensity modulated radiotherapy. Med Phys. 2000;27(10):2231-2241.

[7] Earl MA, Afghan MKN, Yu CX, et al. Jaws-only IMRT using direct aperture optimization. Med Phys. 2007;34(1):307-314.

[9] Dai JR, Hu YM. Intensity-modulation radiotherapy using independent collimators: An algorithm study. Med Phys. 1999;26(12):2562-2570.

[10] Shepard DM, Earl MA, Li XA, et al. Direct aperture optimization: A turnkey solution for step-and-shoot IMRT. Med Phys. 2002;29(6):1007-1018.

[11] Mu G, Xia P. A feasibility study of using conventional jaws to deliver complex IMRT plans for head and neck cancer. Phys Med Biol. 2009;54(18):5613-5623.

[12] Nguyen J. Method for intensity modulated radiation treatment using independent collimator jaws. Patent US 7180980 2006.

[13] Tai DT, Son ND, Loan TTH, Trang NTH. Initial experiences of applying the jaws-only IMRT technique in Dong Nai General Hospital, Vietnam. IFMBE Proceedings. 2018;63:335-339

[14] Tai DT, Son ND, Loan TTH, Anson HPW. Quality assurance of the jaws only-intensity modulated radiation therapy plans for head- and-neck cancer. Phys Med. 2017;38:148-152.

[15] Kumar S, Cheruparambil A, Thokkayil AP, et al. Clinically evaluating directional dependence of 2D seven29 ion-chamber array with different IMRT plans. Int J Cancer Ther Oncol. 2015;3(4):348.

[16] Nelms BE, Zhen H, Tomé WA. Per-beam, planar IMRT QA passing rates do not predict clinically relevant patient dose errors. Med Phys. 2011;38(2):1037-1044.

Polish Journal of Medical Physics and Engineering

The Journal of Polish Society of Medical Physics

Journal Information

CiteScore 2017: 0.19
ICV 2017 = 103.49

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2017: 0.104
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2017: 0.233


All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 623 622 46
PDF Downloads 292 292 22