Optimization of Gluten-Free Tulumba Dessert Formulation Including Corn Flour: Response Surface Methodology Approach

Open access


Tulumba dessert is widely preferred in Turkey; however, it cannot be consumed by celiac patients because it includes gluten. The diversity of gluten-free products should be expanded so that celiac patients may meet their daily needs regularly. In this study, corn flour (CF) / potato starch (PS) blend to be used in the gluten-free tulumba dessert formulation was optimized using the Response Surface Methodology (RSM). Increasing ratio of PS in the CF-PS led to a decrease in hardness of the dessert and to an increase in expansion, viscosity, adhesiveness, yield of dessert both with and without syrup (P<0.05). When considering the properties used in optimization process, the optimum formulation was found to be as 201.52 g water and 0.18 g CMC and 100 g blend of CF-PS at the rates of 59:41. In sensory evaluation test, appearance, symmetry, crispness and aftertaste properties of the gluten-free dessert prepared from this formulation were very close to control sample (P>0.05), additionally these desserts had a much higher sensory score compared to the control sample in terms of the overall quality and pore structure (P<0.05).

1. Akbas O., Dogan I.S., Tuncturk Y., Utilization of exopolysaccharides in reduced fat cake production. GTD – Food, 2012, 37, 141–148 (in Turkish).

2. Arendt E.K., Bello F.D. Gluten-free cereal products and beverages. Food Sci. Tech. Int. Series, Access 07.01.2009. [www.google.com].

3. Bulut B., A study on glutenfree tulumba dessert production. Master thesis, 2013. Igdir University, Department of Food Engineering, Igdir, Turkey.

4. BeMiller J.N., Whistler R.L., Potato starch: Production, Modifications and Uses. 2009, in: Starch: Chemistry and Technology, 3rd edition, Academic Press, pp. 511–539.

5. Chartrand L.J., Russo P.A., Dulhaime A.G., Seidman E.G., Wheat starch intolerance in patients with coeliac disease. J. Am. Diet. Assoc., 1997, 97, 612–618.

6. Chanderan K., Chee C., Guruprasad A., Effects of frying parameters on physical changes of tapioca chips during deep-fat frying. Int. J. Food Sci. Techn., 1996, 31, 249–256.

7. CoHort. Costat User’s Guide 2004. CoHort software, Monterey, CA.

8. Dogan I.S., Yurt B., Determination of factors affecting fat absorption during tulumba dessert production. GTD – Food 2002, 27, 65–71 (in Turkish).

9. Dogan I.S., Yildiz O., Multiple response optimisations for the development of reduced-fat cake. Food Manufact. Effic., 2010, 3, 35–40.

10. Ertekin V., Selimoglu M.A., Kardas F., Aktas E., Prevalence of celiac disease in Turkish children. J. Clin. Gastroenterol., 2005, 39, 689–691.

11. Gularte M.A., De la Hera E., Gomez M., Rosel C.M., Effect of different fibers on batter and gluten-free layer cake properties. LWT-Food Sci. Tech., 2012, 48, 209–214.

12. Horvath K., Mehta D.I., Celiac disease: a worldwide problem. Ind. J. Pediatrics, 2000, 67, 757–763.

13. Lazaridou A., Duta D., Papageorgiou M., Belc N., Biliaderis C.G., Effects of hydrocolloids on dough rheology and bread quality parameters in gluten-free formulations. J. Food Engin., 2007, 79, 1033–1047.

14. Levent H., Bilgiçli N., Enrichment of gluten-free cakes with lupin (Lupinus albus L.) or buckwheat (Fagopyrum esculentum M.) flours. Int. J. Food Sci. Nutr., 2011, 62, 725–728.

15. Lohiniemi S., Maki M., Kaukinen K., Laippala P., Collin P., Gastrointestinal symptoms rating scale in coeliac patients on wheat starch-based gluten-free diets. Scand. J. Gastroent., 2000, 35, 947–949.

16. Lopez A.C.B., Pereira A.J.G., Junqueira R.G., Flour mixture of rice flour, corn and cassava starch in the production of gluten-free white bread. Brazilian Arch. Biol. Technol., 2004, 47, 63–70.

17. Milde L.B., Ramallo L.A., Puppo M.C., Gluten-free bread based on tapioca starch: texture and sensory studies. Food Bioprocess Techn., 2012, 5, 888–896.

18. Özen F.B., A research on the production method of tulumba dessert, on the end product quality, and the effect of the use of different types of flour and additives. Master thesis, 2006. Selcuk University, Department of Food Engineering, Konya, Turkey.

19. Özkaya B., Özkaya H., Effects of vital gluten and SSL on the technological properties of flours with corn flour. GTD – Food, 1992, 17, 419-426 (in Turkish).

20. Ronda F., Gómez M., Caballero P.A., Oliete B., Blanco C.A., Improvement of quality of gluten-free layer cakes. Food Sci. Tech. Int., 2009, 15, 193–202.

21. Sanchez H.D., Osella C.A., Tela T., Optimisation of gluten-free bread prepared from cornstarch, rice flour and cassava starch. J. Food Sci., 2002, 67, 416–419.

22. Savtekin N., Corn noodle, enriched with legume flours for celiac patients. Master thesis, 2014. Hacettepe University, Department of Food Engineering, Ankara, Turkey.

23. Shih F.F., Truong V.D., Daigle K.W., Physicochemical properties of gluten-free pancakes from rice and sweet potato flours. J. Food Qual., 2006, 29, 97–107.

24. StatGraphics 2006. StatGraphics Centrium Release 15.1. Warrenton, Virginia: Statpoint Inc.

25. Tatar G., Elsurer R., Simsek H., Balaban Y. H., Hascelik G., Ozcebe O. I., Buyukasik Y., Sokmensuer C., Screening of tissue transglutaminase antibody in healthy blood donors for celiac disease screening in the Turkish population. Dig. Dis. Sci., 2004, 49, 1479–84.

26. Witczak M., Juszczak L., Ziobro R., Korus J., Influence of modified starches on properties of gluten-free dough and bread. Part I: rheological and thermal properties of gluten-free dough. Food Hydrocoll., 2012, 28, 353–360.

27. Yildiz O., The effects of formulation, baking and storage periods on the quality of gluten-free cake. PhD thesis, 2010. Yuzuncu Yil University, Department of Food Engineering, Van, Turkey.

28. Yildiz O., Dogan I.S., Optimization of gluten-free cake prepared from chestnut flour and transglutaminase: Response surface methodology approach. Int. J. Food Eng., 2014, 10 (4), 737–746.

Polish Journal of Food and Nutrition Sciences

The Journal of Institute of Animal Reproduction and Food Research of Polish Academy of Sciences in Olsztyn

Journal Information

IMPACT FACTOR 2017: 1.697
5-year IMPACT FACTOR: 1.760

CiteScore 2017: 1.95

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2017: 0.651
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2017: 1.113

Cited By


All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 274 272 76
PDF Downloads 128 128 14