Hedging in Political Discourse: Evidence from the Speeches of King Abdullah II of Jordan

Open access


This paper reports on the findings of a study that aimed to identify the linguistic items which act as hedges in the speeches of King Abdullah II of Jordan, as well as to examine the pragmatic functions of these devices. Twenty-five political speeches of King Abdullah II, randomly selected from the official website of King Abdullah (see Appendix), were analyzed adopting Salager-Meyer’s (1994) taxonomy. The study revealed that the most frequently used hedging device in King Abdullah’s speech is modal auxiliaries, and the most frequently used hedging device subcategory is the modal auxiliary “can”. The findings suggest that these hedging devices fulfil several pragmatic functions. These findings contribute to understanding that speaking a second language (Arabic, in the case of King Abdullah II) neither affects the types of hedging devices nor the functions these devices perform. Moreover, contrary to scientific discourse (e.g., medicine), the research concludes that political discourse as a non-scientific genre resorts to hedging devices to express indirectness, politeness, lack of commitment and probability.

Abdul Majeed, R. “Analysis of Grammatical Forms and Semantic Functions of Hedging in Political Discourse: American Presidential Debate.” Journal of College of Education for Women 21.3 (2010): 750-770. Print.

Algi, Sedef. Hedges and Boosters in L1 and L2 Argumentative Paragraphs: Implications for Teaching L2 Academic Writing. MA Thesis. Ankara: Middle East Technical University, 2012. Print.

Al-Rashady, Fahad. “Determining the Role of Hedging Devices in the Political Discourse of Two American Presidentiables in 2008.” TESOL Journal 7 (2008): 30-42. Print.

Brown, Penelope and Stephen Levinson. Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1987. Print.

Fraser, Bruce. (2010). “Hedging in Political Discourse: The Bush 2007 Press Conferences.” 2010. Web. Boston University. 26 December 2014. .

Holmes, Janet. (1990). “Hedges and Boosters in Women’s and Men’s Speech.” Language & Communication. 10.3 (1990) 185-205. Print.

Hubler, Axel. Understatements and Hedges in English. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 1983. Print.

Hyland, Ken. “Hedging in Academic Writing and EAP Textbooks.” English for Specific Purposes. 13.3 (1994) 239-256. Print.

---. Hedging in Scientific Research Articles. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 1998. Print.

Jalilifar, Alireza and Maryam Alavi. “Power and Politics of Language Use: A Survey of Hedging Devices in Political Interviews.” The Journal of Teaching Language Skills (JTLS). 3.3 (2011): 43-66. Print.

---. (2012). “We Are Surprised; Wasn’t Iran Disgraced There? A Functional Analysis of Hedges and Boosters in Televised Iranian and American Presidential Debates.” Discourse and Communication. 6.2 (2012):135-161. Print.

Lakoff, George. “Hedges: A Study in Meaning Criteria and the logic of fuzzy concepts.” Chicago Linguistics Society Papers 8 (1972): 183-228. Print.

Lakoff, Robin. Language and Woman’s Place. New York: Harper & Row, 1975. Print.

Laurinaityte, Rita. “Hedges in Political Discourse.” Unpublished M.A. thesis. Vilnius: Vilnius Pedagogical University, 2011. Print.

Lyons, John. Semantics. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1977. Print.

Martin-Martin, Pedro (2008). “The Mitigation of Scientific Claims in Research Papers: A Comparative Study.” International Journal of English Studies. 8.2 (2008):133-152. Print.

Miššikova, Gabriela. “Maxim Hedges in Political Discourse: A Contrastive Perspective.” Topics in Linguistics 1 (2007): 76-79. Print.

Navratilova, Michaela. Hedges in Biomedical Research Articles. Diploma thesis.Brno: Masaryk University, 2013. Print.

Pellby, Ellen. “Hedging in Political Discourse: An Analysis of Hedging in an American City Council.” Unpublished B.A. thesis, Gavle: Gavle University, 2013. Print.

Quirk, Randolph et al. A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language.London and New York: Longman, 1985. Print.

Rabab’ah, Ghaleb. “Hedging in Nursing and Education Academic Articles.” Journal of Education, Business & Society: Contemporary Middle Eastern Issues. 6.3/4 (2013): 195-215. Print.

Salager-Meyer, Francoise. “Hedges and Textual Communicative Function in Medical English Written Discourse.” English for Specific Purposes 13.2 (1994): 149-171. Print.

---. “I Think that Perhaps You Should: A Study of Hedges in Written Discourse.” In Functional Approaches to Written Text: Classroom Applications. Ed. Tom Miller, 105-118. Washington: United States Information Agency, 2012. Print.

Šandova, Jana. “Speaker’s Involvement in Political Interviews.” Unpublished M.A. thesis. Brno: Masaryk University, 2010. Print.

Taweel, Abeer Q., et al. “Hedging in Political Discourse.” The Linguistics Journal 5 (2011): 169-196. Print.

Truong, Nguyen Thao Tran. “Linguistic Features of Hedges in Inaugural Addresses by the US Presidents.” Unpublished MA thesis. Da Nang: Da Nang University, 2010. Print.

Varttala, Teppo. “Hedging in Scientifically Oriented Discourse Exploring Variation according to Discipline and Intended Audience.” Unpublished Doctoral dissertation. Tampere: University of Tampere, 2001. Print.

Zuck, J.G. and L.V. Zuck (1986). “Hedging in News Writing.” In Beads or Bracelets? How Do we Approach LSP, Selected Papers from the Fifth European Symposium on LSP. Ed. A.M. Cornu et. al., 172-180, Oxford: Oxford University Press. Print

Prague Journal of English Studies

The Journal of Charles University, Faculty of Education

Journal Information


All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 950 713 51
PDF Downloads 524 438 18