The Verisimilitudinarian approach to ‘the Truth’

Open access

Abstract

The Verisimilitudinarian approach to scientific progress (VS, for short) is traditionally considered a realist-correspondist model to explain the proximity of our best scientific theories to the way things really are in the world out there (ʻthe Truthʻ, with the capital ʻtʻ). However, VS is based on notions, such as ʻestimated verisimilitudeʻ or ʻapproximate truthʻ, that dilute the model in a functionalist-like theory. My thesis, then, is that VS tries to incorporate notions, such as ʻprogressʻ, in a pre-constituted metaphysical conception of the world, but fails in providing a fitting framework. The main argument that I will develop to support this claim is that the notions that they use to explain scientific progress (ʻestimated verisimilitudeʻ or ʻapproximate truthʻ) have nothing to do with ʻthe Truthʻ. After presenting Cevolani and Tamboloʻs answer (2013) to Birdʻs arguments (2007), I will claim that VS sacrifices the realist-correspondist truth in favor of an epistemic notion of truth, which can obviously be compatible with certain kinds of realism but not with the one the authors have in mind (the correspondence between our theories and the way things really are).

Bird, A. [2007]. What is scientific progress. Nous, 41 (1), 64-89.

Cevolani, G., Tambolo, L., [2013]. Progress as approximation to the truth. Erkenntnis, 78 (4), 921-935.

Kieseppä, A. I., [1996]. On the Aim of the Theory of Verisimilitude. Synthese, 107 (3), 421-438.

Kuipers, T., [1987]. A structuralist approach to truthlikeness. In T. Kuipers (ed.), What Is Closer-to-the-Truth?, Amsterdam: Rodopi, 79-99.

Kuipers, T. [2000]. From instrumentalism to constructive realism, Dordrecht: Kluwer.

Miller, D., [1974]. Popper’s qualitative theory of verisimilitude. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 25 (2), 166-177.

Neuber, M., [2014]. Critical realism in perspective. In Galavotti, M., Dieks, D., Gonzales, W., Hartmann, S., Uebel, T., & Weber, M. (eds.), The Philosophy of Science in a European Perspective: New Directions in the Philosophy of Science, Springer, 657-673.

Niiniluoto, I., [1987]. Truthlikeness. Dordrecht: Kluwer.

Niiniluoto, I., [1998]. Verisimilitude the third period. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 49 (1), 1-29.

Oddie, G., [1986], Likeness to truth. Reidel Publishing Company.

Oddie, G., Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Truthlikeness.

Tarski, A., [1969] The concept of truth in formalized languages. http://www.thatmarcusfamily.org/philosophy/Course_Websites/Readings/Tarski%20-%20The%20Concept%20of%20Truth%20in%20Formalized%20Languages.pdf

Tichy, P., [1974], On Popper’s definition of verisimilitude. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 25 (2), 155-160.

Zamora Bonilla, J. P., [1992]. Truthlikeness without truth. Synthese, 93 (3), 343-372.

Zamora Bonilla [2000,] Truthlikeness, rationality and scientific method. Synthese, 122 (3), 321-335.

Perspectives

International Postgraduate Journal of Philosophy

Journal Information

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 150 150 21
PDF Downloads 99 99 11