Product development models in the IT sector-From Waterfall to Agile Project Management Model s in the case of AVIRA SOFT S.R.L

Open access


The digitalization process of the business activities has increased tremendously in the last fifty years, revolutionizing several fields of activity, such as communication, medicine, production, transport, as well as all aspects of the daily social, economic and political processes. Furthermore, the IT field has developed new ways of innovating, including new management models in the production field, that allow management of IT companies to become more customer-oriented in a dynamic competitive field. As technological progress is becoming present in every aspect of everyday life, the pressure for innovation and customer involvement represent the two main challenges of producing successful prototypes and final products for the IT market. The purpose of the present paper is to analyze two of the main product development business model trends in the IT field, namely Waterfall model and Agile model, the latest being an adapting strategy to increased customer requirements and the changing business environment. In order to ensure a practical approach the case study was based on the analysis of their implementation within the company Avira Soft S.R.L. The results of the study emphasized the benefits of using the Agile model at Avira Soft S.R.L starting with 2011 in comparison to the previous model of Waterfall product development. The relevance of the paper consists in the fact that the two models indicate how the IT product development business models are evolving depending on environmental factors and the need for continuous adaptation and innovation due to increased competition. The Agile model brought improvements of the Waterfall model, but also new challenges regarding the organizational culture, communication between members of the company and more pressure for continuous improvement. However these two models are an example of how the IT product development business models are evolving and they form a basis for future product development strategies.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • Ajam (2018). Project management beyong Waterfall and Agile. Florida: Taylor & Francis Group.

  • Avira (2018). Avira. Retrieved from

  • Christensen H.B. (2010) Flexible Reliable Software: Using Patterns and Agile Development. Florida: CRC Press Taylor & Francis Group.

  • Comptia (2017). IT industry outlook. Retrieved from:

  • Dima A.M. & Ghinea V. (2016). A Model of Academic Leadership Retrieved from:

  • Dima A.M. Vasilache S.N. (2013). Principles and strategies to balance ethical social and environmental concerns with corporate requirements. Book Series: Advances in Sustainability and Environmental Justice 12 51-66.

  • Dima A. M. Hadad S. & Luchian I. (2017 July). Review on the dimensions of businessuniversity alliances. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Business Excellence (Vol. 11 No. 1 pp. 64-73). De Gruyter Open..

  • Ghinea V. M. Dima A. M. & Hadad S. (2017). EXCELLENCE MODEL FOR SUSTAINABLE CONVERGENCE IN THE EU HIGHER EDUCATION. Amfiteatru Economic 19(11) 1107-1122

  • Hazzan O. & Dubinsky Y. (2008). Agile software engineering. London: Springer Verlag.

  • Imran G. Jawawi D.N.A Dorairaj S. (2016). Emerging Innovations in Agile Software Development. Hershey PA: IGI Global.

  • Layton M.C. & OstermillerS.J. (2017). Agile Project Management For Dummies. Retrieved from:

  • Marchessi M. & Succi G. (2003). Extreme Programming and Agile Processes in Software Engineering. Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag.

  • Münch J. & Vierimaa M. (2006). Product-Focused Software Process Improvement. Retrieved from:

  • SDLC (2017). SDLC-Agile Model. Retrieved from:

  • Stober T. Hansmann U. (2010). Agile Software Development: Best Practices for Large Software Development Projects. Retrieved from:

Journal information
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 1260 1013 75
PDF Downloads 1220 957 73