The importance of human resources within the strategic direction and organizational success

Open access


The economic environment in Romania faces a series of turbulences generated by the political and social environment, and an avalanche of changes and fluctuations can destabilize the activity of an organization. As a consequence, organizations need to be as flexible as possible, able to adapt and integrate any kind of change. In this regard, a manager must study the type of organizational culture found at the company level and the way it can influence the results of the organization. A detailed investigation method belongs to researchers Kim Cameron and Robert E. Quinn who have proposed a model of culture analysis that involves identifying the type of dominant culture and recognizing behaviours which are specific to organizational dimensions such as: organizational leadership, employee management, strategic direction, or criteria of success. The present paper aims to analyze the type of objectives managers set for their employees (namely the strategic emphases dimension) and how they measure results (the criteria of success dimension) at the level of a private company in Romania. Thus, following the application of the Organizational Culture Assessment Instrument proposed by the two authors, we identified the type of culture that characterizes the two dimensions, the connection established between them, the possible inconsistencies between the present and the desired situation as perceived by the employees, as well as the type of correlation between the economic and financial indicators and the cultural profile that identifies the success. Such an analysis is very useful as it identifies a series of inconsistencies between the way the goals are set by the managers and the way to measure success, the two dimensions being in a tight interdependence. Thus, a discrepancy between the two dimensions can lead to conflicts at the organizational level, with the manager having a tendency to set a series of objectives (e.g. individual objectives), in fact pursuing other results (such as team results). In this respect, the aim of this paper is to identify a correlation between the objectives targeted by the manager, the way he measures success and the satisfaction of the employees with the current situation.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • Bratianu C. & Bolisani E. (2015). Knowledge strategy: An integrated approach for managing uncertainty. In Garlatti A. & Massaro M. (Eds.). Proceedings of the 16th Conference on Knowledge Management University of Udine Italy 3-4 September 2015 (pp. 169-177). Reading: Academic Conferences and Publishing International.

  • Bratianu C. (2007). Thinking patterns and knowledge dynamics. In B. Martins & D. Renyi (Eds.). Proceedings of the 8th European Conference on Knowledge Management. Consorci Escola Industrial de Barcelona Spain 6-7 September 2007. Vol.1 pp.152-156. Reading UK: Academic Conferences Ltd.

  • Burdus E. Caprarescu Gh. Androniceanu A. Miles M.(2000). Managementul schimbarii organizationale Editura Economica Bucharest.

  • Bușe L Siminică M Cîrciumaru D Marcu N Analiza economico-financiară a firmei Editura Sitech Craiova 2007

  • Cameron Kim S. Quinn Robert E.(2011). Diagnosing and changing organizational culture-Based on the Competing Values Framework Jossey-Bass A Wiley Imprint.

  • Cameron Kim S. Downsizing Quality and Performance.(1995). In Robert E. Cole (ed.) The Fall and Rise of the American Quality Movement. New York: Oxford University Press.

  • Cameron Kim S. (1997). Techniques for Making Organizations Effective: Some Popular Approaches. In Daniel Druckman Jerome E.Singer and Harold Van Cott (eds.) Enhancing Organizational Performance.Washington D.C.: National Academies Press.

  • Circiumaru D Siminica M Marcu N. (2010). A study on the return on equity for the Romanian industrial companies Analele Universitatii din Craiova.

  • Colquitt J. Lepine J.A. Wesson M.J.(2010). Organizational behavior:Essentials for improving and commitment. Boston: Mc graw-Hill Irwin.

  • Helfert E.A Tehnici de analiză financiară ediția 11 BMT Publishing House 2011

  • Gordon G. G.(1985). The Relationship Between Corporate Culture and industry Sector and Corporate Performances. In Ralph H. Kilmann and Associates Gaining Control of the Corporate Culture. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

  • Hofstede G. Hofstede G.J. and Minkov M.(2010). Cultures and Organizations: software of the mind:intercultural cooperation and its importance for survival (3rd edition) New York McGraw Hill.

  • Kasten J. (2007) “Knowledge strategy and its influence on knowledge organization” North American Symposium on Knowledge Organization Vol. 1.

  • Marcu N. Meghisan G. M. & Ciobanu M. C. (2015). Research on Romanian Labour Market Dynamics. REVISTA DE CHIMIE 66(9) 1540-1544.

  • Marcu N. & Meghisan G. M. (2014). Strategies for Better Integrate Youngsters within Romanian Companies in the Context of Economic-financial Crisis. Procedia Economics and Finance 8 459-465.

  • Niculescu M. Diagnostic Global-Strategic Ed. Economică București 1998

  • Porter M.E. Competition in Global Industries Harvard Business School Press Boston 1986

  • Siminica M (2010). Diagnostic financiar al firmei Ed. Sitech.

  • Schein E.H (1985). Organizational Culture and leadership: A dynamic view Jossey-Bass San Francisco.

  • Schein E.H (1992). Organizational Culture and leadership Jossey-Bass San Francisco.

  • Schein E.H.(2009). The corporate culture survival guide New and revised edition Jossey- Bass a Wiley Imprint.

  • Peters Thomas J. and Waterman Robert H. Jr. (1982). In Search of Excellence Warner Books Edition.

  • *** Financial and accounting statements of Softronic

Journal information
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 653 496 41
PDF Downloads 564 406 36