Managing ambiguity in business. A holistic and innovative approach

Open access


This article will look at the hurdles of dealing with ambiguity and the wicked problems that organizations are struggling with, by providing key insights from a one year team coaching program that the author had the opportunity to deliver in a Romanian entrepreneurial organization. Based on the actual methods used and highlighting the findings and impact of the program, we will reflect on how ambiguity manifests in organizational settings and how wicked problems can be defined. The methods employed are within the range of complexity science and are holistic approaches to systemic interventions within organizations that combine soft systems methodology, paradoxical theory of change, complex responsive processes approach with important concepts from systems thinking such as archetypes, feedback loops and modeling. One of the key objectives of the article is to reunite different academic approaches and link them to a case study as a way of adding value to these approaches and to reiterate that research needs, to find its rightful place in the practitioners’ toolkit and have a more meaningful and direct impact on the real struggles that business is faced with. The author’s expertize in systemic interventions is based on extensive practitioner experience, having been trained and certified as a systemic coach and facilitator, and therefore draws upon the work of other skilled practitioners that support companies in finding successful ways to address complexity. Although the article can be easily put in the complexity science and systems thinking area of academic interest, the research questions and insights are intended to serve the learning and the evolution of organizations.

Argyris, C., (1986). Skilled Incompetence. Harvard Business Review, 64(5), 74-79.

Nguyen, N. C., and Bosch, O. J. (2014). The Art of Interconnected Thinking: Starting with the Young, Challenges, 5(2), 239-259.

Checkland, P. (2000). Soft Systems Methodology: A Thirty Year Retrospective. Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 17, 11-58.

Churchman, C. W. (1967). Wicked Problems. Management Science, 14(4), 5-21.

Gentner, D., and Stevens, A. L. (2014). Mental models. Hillsdale,: NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Hinshelwood, R. D., (2013). What happens on groups. Psychoanalyis, the Individual and the Community. London: Editura Trei.

Luoma, J., Hämäläinen, R. P., & Saarinen, E. (2007). Coping with complexity : Systems thinking, complex responsive processes, and systems intelligence, Findland: Helsinki University of Technology.

Klaus P. Horn, R. B., (2009). Invisible dynamics - Systemic Constellations in Organisations and in Business. Second Edition ed. Heidelberg: Carl-Auer Verlag.

McLuhan, M., (1962). The Gutenberg Galaxy: The making of typographic man. Toronto: University of Toronto.

Monat, J. P., & Gannon, T. F. (2015). What is Systems Thinking? A Review of Selected Literature Plus Recommendations. American Journal of Systems Science, 4(1), 11-26.

Nathan Bennett, G. J. L., 2014. What VUCA really means for you. Harvard Business Review, January-February.

Nickerson, R. S., (1998). Confirmation Bias; A Ubiquitous Phenomenon in Many Guises, Review of General Psychology, Educational Publishing Foundation, 2(2), pp. 175-220.

Otto Scharmer, K. K., (2013). Leading from the Emerging Future: From Ego-System to Eco-System Economics. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler Publishers.

Subramanian, A., & Kessler, M. (2013). The Hyperglobalization of Trade and Its Future, Peterson Institute for International Economics.

Senge, P. M., (2006). The fifth discipline: The art and practice of the learning organization. Crown Pub.

Stacey, R. D., (2011). Strategic Management and Organisational Dynamics: The challenge of complexity to ways of thinking about organisations,. 6, Pearson education.

Whittington, J., (2016). Systemic Coaching and Constellations. London: Kogan Page Limited.

Wolstenholme, E., (2004). Using generic system arhetypes to support thinking and modelling. System Dynamics Review, 20(4).

World Economic Forum’s Global Agenda Council on Complex Systems, (2013). Perspectives on a Hyperconnected World - Insights from the Science of Complexity. l, 4.

Journal Information


All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 348 343 42
PDF Downloads 140 139 14