Perspectives on social vulnerability and ways to improve community resilience

Open access

Abstract

Scientific recognition of the resilience concept is becoming compelling in extending the way contemporary spatial systems are analysed as well as in defining a new approach in establishing spatial planning principles and policies. In this view, our study emphasises the issue of spatial development in areas prone to earthquakes, floods and landslides. Therefore, resilience requires the assessment of vulnerable spatial components. Local governance interventions are more or less focused on risk management measures. Moreover, building safer communities through risk governance relies on different variables. Making a distinction between risk components and the predictors of increased resilience could shed light on the local decision-making process. In this paper, vulnerability addresses the lack of safety in terms of individual, household and community wellbeing when the issue of environmental restrictions emerge. In order to reduce the vulnerability of communities living in natural risk prone areas, spatial planning often turns to interdisciplinary analysis methods that allow an in-depth perspective on the interplay between social and natural elements. As such, spatial planning stands as the first step in reducing social vulnerability and should approach the less explored advantages of participatory mapping and local knowledge systems.

Armaş, I. (2008), Percepția riscurilor naturale: cutremure, inundații, alunecări, Ed. Universității din București

Armaş, I. (2012), Riscuri naturale (cultura riscului), Facultatea de Geografie, Universitatea din Bucureşti, note de curs http://www.unibuc.ro/prof/scradeanu_d/docs/2014/mai/20_18_51_45hazard_risc.pdf

Bovens M.A.P. (1998), The Quest for Responsibility. Accountability and Citizenship in Complex organisations, Cambridge University Press

Burby R.J. (1998), Cooperating with nature. Confronting natural hazards with land-use planning for sustainable communities, Washington DC: Joseph Henry Press

Cheung W., Houston D., Schubert J.E., Basolo V., Feldman D., Matthew R., Sanders B.F., Karlin B., Goodrich K.A., Contreras S.L., Luke A. (2016), Integrating resident digital sketch maps with expert knowledge to assess spatial knowledge of flood risk: A case study of participatory mapping in Newport Beach, California, Applied Geography 74:56-64

Downing T.E. et al. (2006), Integrating social vulnerability into water management, SEI Working Paper and Newater Working Paper No. 4, Stockholm Environment Institute, Oxford

Freedy J., Hobfoll S., Ribbe D. (1994), Life events, war and adjustment: Lessons for the middle east, Anxiety, Stress and Coping Review 7: 191-203

Georgescu E. S. et al. (2012), Istoria şi specificul riscului seismic în Bucureşti, Lucrările celei de-a VII-a ediţii a Conferinţei anuale a ASTR, București

Giddens A. (1999), Risk and responsibility, Modern law review 62(1):1–10

Guvernul României, Hotărâre nr. 548/2008 privind aprobarea Strategiei naționale de comunicare si informare publică pentru situații de urgență, disponibilă la http://www.dreptonline.ro/legislatie/hotarare_strategie_nationala_comunicare_informare_publica_situatii_urgenta_548_2008.php, accesat noiembrie 2015

Guvernul României (2010), HG 846/2010 Hotărâre pentru aprobarea Strategiei naționale de management al riscului la inundații pe termen mediu și lung, http://www.mmediu.ro/app/webroot/uploads/files/2012-01-10_risc_inundatii_hg846din2010aprobaresnmri.pdf, accesat octombrie 2015

Guzzetti F., Mondini A.C., Cardinali M., Fiorucci F., Santangelo M., Chang K.T. (2012), Landslide inventory maps: new tools for an old problem, Environmental Science Review 112:42-66

Hajer M., Laws D. (2006), Ordering through discourse in Moran M., Rein M., Goodin R.E. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of public policy, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp.33–59

Harmsworth G., Raynor B. (2004), Cultural consideration in landslide perception in Glade TH., Anderson M., Crozier M.J. (Eds.), Landslide Hazard and Risk, Johnson Wiley and Sons

Hooijer A., Klijn F., Bas G., Pedroli M., Van Os A.G. (2004), Towards sustainable flood risk management in the Rhine and Meuse river basins: synopsis of the findings of IRMA-SPONGE, River research and applications, 20(3):343–357

IFCR (2011), Public awareness and public education for disaster risk reduction: a guide, International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies, Geneva, 2011

ISU Olt (2009), Ghidul de comunicare şi informare publică în situaţii de urgenţă pentru judeţul Olt, disponibil la http://isuolt.ro/wp-content/uploads/2013/10/ghid-de-comunicare-si-informare-publica.pdf, accesat noiembrie 2015

Joseph S.A., Yule W., Williams R.M. (1993), Posttraumatic stress: Atributional aspects, Journal of Traumatic Stress 6:501-513

Komendantova N., Mrzyglocki R., Mignan A., Khazai B., Wenzel F., Patt A., Fleming K. (2014), Multi-hazard and multi-risk decision-support tools as a part of participatory risk governance: feedback from civil protection stakeholders, International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction 8:50-67

Lawrence A. (2010), Taking stock of nature: participatory biodiversity assessment for policy, planning and practice, Cambridge University Press, UK

Malamud B.D., Turcotte, D.L., Guzetti F., Reichernbach P. (2004), Landslide inventories and their statistical properties, Earth Surface Processes and Landforms 29(6):697-711

May P.J., Deyle R. (1998), Governing land use in hazardous areas with a patchwork system in Burby R.J. (Ed.), Cooperating with nature. Confronting natural hazards with land-use planning for sustainable communities, Washington DC: Joseph Henry Press, pp. 57–82

Meichenbaum D. (1995), Disaster, stress and cognition in Hobfoll S.E., de Vries M. V. (Eds.), Extreme stress and communities: Impact and intervention, Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluver Academic, pp. 33-61

Mercury Promotions (2007), Proiect de campanie natională de informare și educare publică în domeniul pregătirii pentru situatii de urgență, disponibil la http://www.isugiurgiu.ro/doc/informatii/Proiect_campanie_de_informare_si_educare_publica_dezastre.pdf, accesat noiembrie 2015

Micu M. (2017), The systematic of landslide processes in the conditions of Romania’s Relief, In: M. Rădoane, A. Vespremeanu-Stroe (Eds.), Landform dynamics and evolution in Romania, Springer, 249-270

Murray M. (2010), Participatory rural planning. Exploring evidence from Ireland, Ashgate Publishing Limited, UK

Neuvel J., Van den Brink A. (2009), Flood risk management in Dutch local spatial planning practices, Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 52(7):865-880

Olshansky R.B., Kartez J.D. (1998), Managing land use to build resilience, in Burby R.J. (Ed.), Cooperating with nature. Confronting natural hazards with land-use planning for sustainable communities, Washington DC: Joseph Henry Press, pp.167–203

Roth D., Warner, J. (2007), Flood risk, uncertainty and changing river protection policy in the Netherlands: the case of ‘calamity polders’, Journal of Economic and Social Geography 98(4):519–525

Samodra G., Chen G., Sartodahi J., Kasama K. (2015), Generating landslide inventory by participatory mapping: an example in Purwosari Area, Yogyakarta, Java, Geomorphology, article in press

Sudmeier-Rieux K., Jaquet S., Derron M.-H., Jaboyedoff M. (2012), A case study of coping strategies and landslides in two villages of Central-Eastern Nepal, Applied Geography 32:680-690

Triandis, H.C. (1996), The psychological measurement of cultural syndroms, American Psychologist 51:407-415

Weirich F., Blesius L. (2007), Comparison of satellite and air photo based landslide susceptibility maps, Geomorphology 87:352-364

Wheaton B. (1982), A comparison of the moderating effects of personal coping resources on the impact of exposure to stress in two groups, Journal of Community Psychology 10:293-31

Journal Information

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 292 292 25
PDF Downloads 124 124 11