The main objective of the study was to determine the impact of immediate verbal feedback on swimming effectiveness. Swimming effectiveness was expressed in the subjects reaching their objective, i.e., maximum swimming velocity. The study involved 64 subjects divided into two groups (experimental group n=32; control group n=32). Two measurements - initial (pre-test) and final (post-test) - were conducted. The subjects swam a distance of 25 m front crawl at maximum velocity. The experimental groups received immediate verbal feedback focused on stroke lengthening, as a shorter stroke length is regarded as the most common reason behind lower swimming velocity. From this perspective, lengthening the stroke is important due to its relation with mechanics and energetics in all styles of swimming. The control group received no verbal feedback. All tests were recorded via video cameras (50 samples·s-1). The analysis of the kinematic movement parameters (horizontal average swimming velocity over 15m, time achieved over 15m) was carried out by means of the SIMI Reality Motion Systems 2D software. Analysis of variance with repeated measurements with a Tukey’s test demonstrated statistically significant differences (p<0.05) in the tested groups in the case of the kinematic parameters measured in the study. Immediate verbal feedback (IVF) caused an increase of the average horizontal swimming velocity by 2.92% (0.04 m·s-1). Consequently, the average time needed by the swimmers to cover the distance (15m) decreased by 2.94% (0.36s). The results confirmed the effectiveness of the proposed method of teaching and improving the swimming technique using IVF.
Adams, J. (1971). A closed-loop theory for motor learning. Journal of Motor Behavior, 3, 111-150.
Annesi, J.J. (1998). Effects of computer feedback on adherence to exercise. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 87, 723-730.
Craig, A., Skehan, P., Pawelczyk, J., et al. (1985). Velocity, stroke rate and distance per stroke during elite swimming competition. Med Sci Sports Exerc, 17:625-34.
Craig, A.B. Jr, Pendergast, D.R. (1979). Relationships of stroke rate, distance per stroke and velocity in competitive swimming. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, 11, 278-283.
Doran, G.T. (1981). There’s a S.M.A.R.T. way to write management’s goals and objectives. Management Review, 70(11), 35-36.
Fiłon, M. (1985). Doskonalenie stylu grzbietowego za pomocą informacyjnego systemu stabilizującego parametry czasowo-przestrzenne techniki pływania /Perfecting the backstroke using the information system which stabilizes spatio-temporal parameters of swimming technique. Zeszyty Naukowe AWF we Wrocławiu, 38, 147-156.
Hay, J.G. (2002). Cycle rate, length and speed of progression in human locomotion. J. Appl. Biomech, 18, 257-270.
Hay, J.G., Guimaraes, A.C.S., Grimston, S.K.A. (1983). Quantitive Look at Swimming Biomechanics. In J.G. Hay (Ed.), Starting, Stroking & Turning. A Compilation of Research on the Biomechanics of Swimming (pp. 1-4). Iowa, The University of Iowa.
Kulik, J.A., Kulik, C.C. (1988). Timing of feedback and verbal learning. Review of Educational Research, 58(1), 79-97.
Landin, D. (1996). The role of verbal cues in skill learning. Quest, 46, 299-313.
Lee, T., Swinnen, S., Serrien, J. (1994). Cognitive effort and motor learning. Quest, 46, 328-344.
Magill, R. (1994). The influence of augmented feedback during skill learning depends on characteristics of the skill and the learner. Quest 46, 314-327.
Magill, R. A. (2001). Augmented feedback in motor skill acquisition. In R.N. Singer, H.A Hausenblas, C.M. Janelle (Eds.), Handbook of sport psychology (pp. 86-114). New York, Wiley.
Marteniuk, R.G. (1976). Information Processing in Motor Skills. Holt, New York. Rinehart and Winston.
Miller, G.A. (1956). The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychological Review, 63, 81-97.
More, K.G., Franks, I.M. (1996). Analysis and modification of verbal coaching behaviour: The usefulness of a datadriven intervention strategy. J. Sports Sci, 14, 523-543.
Munzert, J. (1994). Verbo-motorische lernformen im sport./Verbal-motor learning in sport. Brennpunkte derSportwissenschaft. 8(2), 248-258.
Pérez, P., Llana, S., Brizuela, G., Encarnación, A. (2009). Effects of three feedback conditions on aerobic swim speeds. J Sport Sci Med, 8, 30-36.
Petriaev, A., Kleshnev, I.. (2006). Diagnostic. Training and realisation of strength condition of swimmers with use of feedback diagnostic simulator “ART”. Portuguese Journal of Sport Sciences, 6 (Suppl 2), 244-246.
Plagenhoef, S. (1971). Patterns of Human Motion - a Cinematographic Analysis. Englewood Cliffs, Prentice-Hall Inc.
Schmidt, R.A. (1975). Schema theory of discrete motor skill learning. Psychological Review, 82.
Schmidt, R.A., Lee, T.D. (2005). Motor Control and Learning. A Behavioral Emphasis. (4th ed.). Champaign IL, Human Kinetics.
Schmidt, R.A., Wrisberg, C.A. (2008). Motor Learning and Performance (4th ed.). Champaign, IL, Human Kinetics.
Silverman, S.S., Woods, A.M., Subramaniam, P.R. (1998). Task structures, feedback to individual students, and student skill level in physical education. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 69, 420-424.
Ungerechts, B.E., Theismann, M. (1995). Changes of stroke rate during swimming races. In K. Hakkinen, L. Keskinen, V. Komi, A. Mero (Eds.), XVth Congress of the International Society of Biomechanics (pp. 946-947). Jyvaskyla, Finland: Gummerus Printing.
Williams, A. M., Hodges J. N. (2005). Practice, instruction and skill acquisition in soccer: Challenging tradition. J. Sports Sci, 23(6), 637-650.
Wulf, G., Shea, C. (2002). Principles derived from the study of simple skills do not generalize to complex skill learning. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 9, 185-211.
Zatoń, K. (1989). Struktura przekazów słownych nauczycieli wychowania fizycznego/Structure of verbal information of physical education teachers. Zeszyty Naukowe AWF we Wrocławiu, 50, 55-66.
Zatoń, K. (2010). The role of verbal information about sensory experience from movement apparatus in the process of swimming economization. In P.L. Kjendlie, R.K. Stallman, J. Cabri (Eds.), Biomechanics and Medicine in SwimmingXI: proceedings of the XIth International Symposium for Biomechanics and Medicine in Swimming (pp. 349-351). Oslo: Norwegian School of Sport Sciences.
Zatoń, K., Klarowicz, A. (2003). Mowa jako czynnik uświadamiający wrażliwość kinestetyczną w procesie nauczaniauczenia się czynności ruchowych w pływaniu/Speech as a factor causing the awareness of kinesthetic sensibility in the process of teaching-learning of motor function in swimming. Człowiek i Ruch, 2(8), 45-53.
Zatoń, K., Szczepan, S. (2012). The Effect of Immediate Verbal Feedback on the Efficiency and the Effectiveness of Swimming. Baltic Journal of Health and Physical Activity, 4(2), 91-103.
Zatsiorsky, V.M. (1998). Kinematics of human motion. Champaign IL: Human Kinetics.