Perception of the contents of animated maps

Open access

Abstract

Intense development of computer technology has taken place in the last several decades made it possible to cartographically present variability of phenomena in a dynamic way. As a result of using animation techniques in cartography there appeared new methods of presentation of changes, referred to as direct. Considering the character of the relation between display time and real time, two basic types of animated maps have been distinguished: temporal and non-temporal. Other criteria of classifying animation are the presence and level of interactivity and the technical criteria of production.

Regardless of the applied classification, perception of the contents of animated maps is one of the main issues, since using animation leads to a significant cognitive load specific for dynamic methods. Fast sequence of data and its quick disappearance can result in omission of some information because in the case of animated maps there is a higher risk of exceeding perception potential of users than in the case of static maps.

Higher efficiency of animated map perception can be achieved by applying methods of cognitive overload reduction determined through experimental research. The most important of them are: using control tools, directing attention with dynamically blinking lights, locating connected objects close to one another, using sound, adapting generalization level to the characteristics of moving images and accounting for the age and experience of map users.

Among more sophisticated solutions are such elements as so-called decay and a combination of static and animated map features in the form of semi-static animations.

Andrienko N., Andrienko G., Gatalsky P., 2000, Supporting visual exploration of object movement. In: Proceedings of the Working Conference on Advanced Visual Interfaces AVI 2000, Palermo, Italy, May 23-26. New York: ACM Press, pp. 217-220.

Ayers P., Kalyuga S., Marcus N., Sweller J., 2005, The conditions under which instructional animation may be effective. International Workshop and Mini-Conference on Extending Cognitive Load Theory and Instructional Design to the Development of Expert Performance, 29 August, Heerlen, Netherlands. (access 12.1.2017).

Cornwall B., Robinson A., 1966, Possibilities for computer animated films in cartography. “The Cartographic Journal” Vol. 3, No. 2, pp. 79-82.

Dransch D., 1993, Kartographische Animation. In: Kartographie und Geo-Informationssysteme, Grundlagen, Entwicklungsstand und Trends. „Kartographische Schriften” 1. Bonn: Kirschbaum Verlag, pp. 3-15.

Gersmehl P.J., 1990, Choosing tools: nine metaphors of four-dimensional cartography. “Cartographic Perspectives” no. 5, pp. 3-17.

Harrower M., 2003, Tips for designing effective animated maps. “Cartographic Perspectives” Vol. 44, pp. 63-65, (access 25.10.2005).

Harrower M., 2004, A look at the history and future of animated maps. “Cartographica” Vol. 39, no. 3, pp. 33-42, (access 29.11.2005).

Harrower M., 2007, The cognitive limits of animated maps. “Cartographica” Vol. 42, no. 4, pp. 349-357.

Harrower M., Sheesley B., 2005, Designing better map interfaces: A framework for panning and zooming. “Transactions in GIS” Vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 77-89. (access 29.11.2005).

Hasler B.S., Kersten B., Sweller J., 2006, User control as an instructional method to reduce learners’ cognitive load in transient animation. Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association (AERA 2006), April 6-11, San Francisco.

Kalyuga S., Chandler P., Sweller J., 1999, Managing split-attention and redundancy in multimedia instruction. “Applied Cognitive Psychology” Vol. 13, pp. 351-371. (access 12.1.2017).

Koussoulakou A., Kraak M.-J., 1992, Spatio-temporal maps and cartographic communication. “The Cartographic Journal” Vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 101-108.

Kowalski P.J., 2002, Kartografia dynamiczna - wyzwanie metodyczne i techniczne. In: Świat mapy - świat na mapie. „Główne problemy współczesnej kartografii 2002”. Wrocław: Uniwersytet Wrocławski, Pracownia Atlasu Dolnego Śląska, Zakład Kartografii, pp. 137-154.

Kraak M.-J., Edsall R., MacEachren A.M., 1997, Cartographic animation and legends for temporal maps: exploration and or interaction. In: Proceedings of the 18th ICA/ACI International Conference. Stockholm. (access 25.10.2005).

Kraak M.-J., Klomp A., 1995, A classification of cartographic animations: towards a tool for the design of dynamic maps in a GIS environment, (access 9.4.2013).

Kraak M.-J., Ormeling F., 1998, Kartografia, wizualizacja danych przestrzennych, Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.

Maruszewski T., 2002, Psychologia poznania - sposoby rozumienia siebie i świata. Gdańsk: Gdańskie Wydawnictwo Psychologiczne.

Mayer R.E., 2001, Multimedia Learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Mayer R.E., Chandler P., 2001, When learning is just a click away: does simple user interaction foster deeper understanding of multimedia messages? “Journal of Educational Psychology” No. 93, pp. 390-397.

Mayer R.E., Mathias A., Wetzell K., 2002, Fostering understanding of multimedia messages through pre-training: evidence for a two-stage theory of mental model construction “Journal of Experimental Psychology” No. 8, pp. 147-54.

Mayer R.E., Moreno R., 2002, Animation as an aid to multimedia learning. “Educational Psychology Review“ Vol. 14, pp. 87-99. (access 12.1.2017).

Mayer R.E., Moreno R., 2003, Nine ways to reduce cognitive load in multimedia learning. “Educational Psychologist” Vol. 38, no. 1, pp. 43-52. (access 12.1.2017).

Meksuła M.W., 1999, Problemy kartograficznej prezentacji zjawisk dynamicznych na przykładzie map ludnościowych. Doctor thesis, Lublin.

Midtbø T., 2001, Perception of time variables on dynamic maps. In: Proceedings of the 20th International Cartographic Conference. 6-10 August, Beijing, China [CD-ROM].

Moellering H. 1976, The potential uses of a computer animated film in the analysis of geographical patterns of traffic crashes. “Accident Analysis & Prevention” Vol. 8, pp. 215-227.

Moellering H., 1980, The real-time animation of three-dimensional maps. “The American Cartographer” Vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 67-75.

Monmonier M., 1992, Authoring graphic scripts: experiences and principles. “Cartography and Geographic Information Science” Vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 247-60.

Monmonier M., Gluck M., 1994, Focus groups for design improvement in dynamic cartography. “Cartography and Geographic Information Science” Vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 37-47.

Morrison J.B., 2000, Does animation facilitate learning? An evaluation of the congruence and equivalence hypotheses. Doctor thesis, Department of Psychology, Stanford University.

Nossum A.S., 2012, Semistatic animation - integrating past, present and future in map animations. “The Cartographic Journal” Vol. 49, no. 1, pp. 43-54.

Ogao J.P., 2002, Exploratory visualization of temporal geospatial data using animation. (access 7.7.2006).

Opach T., 2006, Z problematyki wykorzystania animacji w kartografii. „Polski Przegląd Kartograficzny” T. 38, nr 4, pp. 301-315.

Opach T., 2007, Eksperymentalne badania wpływu złożoności map animowanych prezentujących dynamikę zjawisk na ich percepcję. In: Współczesne problemy metodyki kartograficznej „Prace i Studia Kartograficzne” T. 1, Eds. M. Sirko, P. Cebrykow, Lublin, pp. 200-209.

Opach T., Gołębiowska I., Fabrikant S.I., 2014, How do people view multi-component animated maps? “The Cartographic Journal” Vol. 51, no. 4, pp. 330-342.

Patton D.K., Cammack R.G., 1996, An examination of the effects of task type and map complexity on sequenced and static choropleth maps. In: Cartographic Design: Theoretical and Practical Perspectives. Eds. C.H. Wood, P. Keller, Chichester, UK: Wiley, pp. 237-52.

Peterson M.P., 1995, Interactive and animated cartography. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Prentice Hall.

Peterson M.P., 1996, Between reality and abstraction: non-temporal applications of cartographic animation (access 25.4.2013).

Peterson M.P., 1999, Active legends for interactive cartographic animation. “International Journal of Geographic Information Science” Vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 375-83. (access 12.1.2017).

Rieber L.P., Parmley M.W., 1995, To teach or not to teach? Comparing the use of computer-based simulations in deductive versus inductive approaches to learning with adults in science. “Journal of Educational Computing Research” Vol. 13, pp. 359-374. (access 12.1.2017).

Slocum, T.A., Robeson S.H., Egbert S.L., 1990, Traditional versus sequenced choropleth maps: An experimental investigation. “Cartographica” Vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 67-88.

Slocum T.A., Sluter R.S., Kessler F.C., Yoder S.C., 2004, A qualitative evaluation of MapTime, a program for exploring spatiotemporal point data. “Cartographica” Vol. 39, no. 3, pp. 43-68.

Thrower N.J.W., 1959, Animated cartography. “The Professional Geographer” Vol. 11, no. 6, pp. 9-12.

Thrower N.J.W., 1961, Animated cartography in the United States. “International Yearbook of Cartography” Vol 1, pp. 20-30.

Tobler W.R., 1970, A computer movie simulating urban growth in the Detroit region. “Economic Geography” Vol. 46, pp. 234-240.

Tversky B., Morrison J. B., Bétrancourt M., 2002, Animation: Can it facilitate? (access 29.11.2005).

Zimbardo P.G., 1999, Psychologia i życie. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.

http://maps.unomaha.edu/cartographic/animation/Wausau2.MOV

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m8Rbl7JG4Ng

http://sydney.edu.au/arts/timemap/examples/map_animation.shtml

http://www.scotese.com/pg080anim.htm

http://maps.unomaha.edu/cartographic/animation/NonTemporal/SpatTrend.MOV

http://maps.unomaha.edu/cartographic/animation/NonTemporal/GenAnim.MOV

http://maps.unomaha.edu/cartographic/animation/NonTemporal/Class_Anim.MOV

Journal Information

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 134 134 10
PDF Downloads 57 57 4