Construction mediation and its hybridization: the case of the Hong Kong construction industry

Open access

Abstract

In view of the sophisticated nature of construction disputes, specialized dispute resolution mechanisms are of pivotal importance to the satisfactory settlement between disputing parties. Among the various construction dispute resolution mechanisms, mediation has been increasingly gaining recognition and acceptance. Its hybrid, namely mediation-arbitration (med-arb), has also emerged and has started receiving attention and appreciation. With special reference to the construction industry practice in Hong Kong, a commentary on the respective merits and demerits of construction mediation and construction med-arb, as well as the ways forward, are presented in this article.

Banaitienė, N., & Banaitis, A. (2012). Construction Project Management. Technika, Vilnius, Lithuania, 217pp.

Chau, K. W. (2007). Insight into resolving construction disputes by mediation/adjudication in Hong Kong. Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice, American Society of Civil Engineers, 133(2), pp. 143-147.

Chee, S. W. H. (2006). Setting arbitration in Hong Kong as the preferred dispute resolution centre for disputing arising in PRC. MA thesis, City University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, 122pp.

Chee, S. W. H. (2013). From right to interest - specialised facilitative mediation (construction). JSD thesis, City University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, 555pp.

Chee, S. W. H., & Campbell, J. (2016). Construction Dispute Prevention and Resolution in Hong Kong 2016. Sweet & Maxwell, Hong Kong.

Cheng, T. Y. W., & Soo, G. K. L. (2013). Construction Law and Practice in Hong Kong, 3rd edn. Sweet & Maxwell, Hong Kong, 809pp.

Cheung, S. O. (2014). Construction Dispute Research: Conceptualisation, Avoidance and Resolution. Springer International Publishing, Switzerland, 410pp.

Construction Industry Council. (2015). Reference Materials for Application of Dispute Resolution in Construction Contracts, Version 2. Construction Industry Council, Hong Kong, 112pp.

Eilenberg, I. M. (2003). Dispute Resolution in Construction Management. UNSW Press, Sydney, Australia, 196pp.

Fisher, R., Ury, W., & Patton, B. (2011). Getting to Yes: Negotiating Agreement without Giving in, 3rd edn. Penguin, New York, USA, 204pp.

Hong Kong Government. (1984). Administrative Guidelines for the Trial Mediation Scheme. Lands & Works Branch Technical Circular No. 10/84. Hong Kong Government, Hong Kong.

Hong Kong Government. (1985). General Conditions of Contract for Civil Engineering Works, 1985 Edition. Hong Kong Government, Hong Kong.

Hong Kong Government. (1989). Administrative Guidelines for Mediation in Construction Disputes. Lands & Works Branch Technical Circular No. 8/89. Hong Kong Government, Hong Kong.

Hong Kong Government. (1991). Hong Kong Government Mediation Rules. Hong Kong Government, Hong Kong.

Hong Kong Government. (1993). General Conditions of Contract for Civil Engineering Works, 1993 Edition. Hong Kong Government, Hong Kong.

Hong Kong Government. (1997). Hong Kong Law Chapter 341: Arbitration Ordinance. Hong Kong Judiciary, Hong Kong.

Hong Kong Government. (1999). General Conditions of Contract for Civil Engineering Works, 1999 Edition. Hong Kong Government, Hong Kong.

Hong Kong Government. (2013). Hong Kong Law Chapter 620: Mediation Ordinance. Hong Kong Judiciary, Hong Kong.

Hong Kong Government. (2014). Hong Kong Law Chapter 609: Arbitration Ordinance. Hong Kong Judiciary, Hong Kong.

Hong Kong Institute of Architects, Hong Kong Institute of Construction Managers, Hong Kong Institute of Surveyors. (2005). Agreement & Schedule of Conditions of Building Contract for Use in the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region. Hong Kong Institute of Architects, Hong Kong Institute of Construction Managers, Hong Kong Institute of Surveyors, Hong Kong.

Kagel, J. (1993). Mediating grievances. In: Gruenberg, G. W. (ed.), Arbitration 1993: The Changing Competitive Environment and Arbitration, Proceedings of the 46th Annual Meeting of the National Academy of Arbitrators, Washington, DC, USA. Bureau of National Affairs, Washington, DC, USA, pp. 76-89.

Kaklauskas, A., Kersuliene, V., & Urbanaviciene, V. (2008). Determination of rational method for resolution of disputes with the help of multi-criteria negotiation decision support system for real estate. In: Proceedings of the 25th International Symposium on Automatic and Robotics in Construction, Vilnius, Lithuania. Elsevier, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, pp. 585-591.

Kumaraswamy, M. M. (1998). Consequences of construction conflict: A Hong Kong perspective. Journal of Management in Engineering, American Society of Civil Engineers, 14(3), pp. 66-74.

Kumaraswamy, M. M., & Soo, G. K. L. (2010). Mediation - past, present, and prospects: Hong Kong perspective. Journal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction, American Society of Civil Engineers, 2(4), pp. 194-197.

Landry, S. (1996). Med-Arb: Mediation with a bite and an effective ADR model. Defense Counsel Journal, 63(2), pp. 263-269.

Levin, P. (2016). Construction Contract Claims, Changes, and Dispute Resolution. American Society of Civil Engineers, Reston, VA, USA, 477pp.

Mak, A. (2005). Whether it is viable to widely adopt the practice of mediation-arbitration (“Med-Arb”) in Hong Kong Special Administrative Region. MA dissertation, School of Law, City University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, 69pp.

Oghigian, H. (2003). The mediation/arbitration hybrid. Journal of International Arbitration, 20(1), pp. 75-80.

Richbell, D. (2008). Mediation of Construction Disputes. Blackwell Publishing, Oxford, UK, 175pp.

Organization, Technology and Management in Construction: an International Journal

Co-published with University of Zagreb, Faculty of Civil Engineering

Journal Information

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 213 213 71
PDF Downloads 88 88 30