Control panel and indicators for production control in building projects

Open access


In general, every project should have indicators that monitor compliance with established goals. In con­struction projects, there are a large number of indicators proposed by many researchers; however, an analysis of the state of the art shows a frequent confusion between Result, Process and Leading Indicators. This paper, which is an extended version of the paper sub­mitted by the same authors at the Creative Construction Conference 2017 and published in Procedia Engineering (DOI: 10.1016/j.proeng.2017.07.230), presents a proposal of these three types of indicators for the design, supply and assembly phases of housing projects. Thus, all project stakeholders can have a control panel that will monitor if an indicator exceeds the limits, thereby allowing taking corrective actions in a timely and effective manner.


  • Alarcon, L., Grillo, A., Freire, J., & Diethelm, S. (2001). Learning from collaborative benchmarking in the construction industry. In: 9th Annual Conference of the International Group for Lean Construction. International Group for Lean Construction, Singapore.

  • Ali, H., Al-Sulaihi, I., & Al-Gahtani, K. (2013). Indicators for measuring performance of building construction companies in Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. Journal of King Saud University - Engineering Sciences. 25, pp. 125-134.

  • American Institute of Architects - California Council. (2007). Integrated Project Delivery: A Guide. American Institute of Architects, California.

  • Atkinson, R. (1999). Project management: cost, time and quality, two best guesses and a phenomenon, it’s time to accept other success criteria. International Journal of Project Management, 17, pp. 337-342.

  • Ballard, G. (2008). The Lean Project Delivery System - An Update. Lean Construction Journal, 1, pp. 1-19.

  • Botero, L., Álvarez, M., & Ramírez, C. (2007). Iniciativa colombiana en la definición de indicadores de desempeño como punto de partida de un sistema de referenciación para la construcción. Ambiente Construido, 7, pp. 89-102.

  • Building Research Establishment. (2016). BREEAM International New Construction 2016. BRE Global, Watford.

  • Cheung, S., Suen, H., & Cheung, K. (2004). PPMS: a web-based construction project performance monitoring system. Automation in construction, 13, pp. 361-376.

  • CII Construction Industry Institute. (2011). Productivity Benchmarking Summary Report. Construction Industry Institute, Austin.

  • Constructing Excellence. (2013). Client’s Commitments Best Practice Guide. Constructing Client’s Group, London.

  • Costa, D., Formoso, C., Kagioglou, M., & Alarcón, L. (2004). Performance measurement systems for benchmarking in the construction industry. In: 12th Annual Conference of the International Group for Lean Construction. International Group for Lean Construction, Denmark.

  • Da Costa, J., Horta, I., Guimaraes, N., Nóvoa, H., & Sousa, R. (2006). Sistemas de Indicadores de desempenho e produtividade para a construção civil. In: Encontro nacional sobre qualidade e inovacao na construcao. Laboratório Nacional de Engenharia Civil, Lisboa.

  • Egan, J. (1998). Rethinking Construction, Construction Task Force Report for Department of the Environment, Transport and the Regions. Department of Trade and Industry, Londres.

  • El-Mashaleh, M., Minchin, R., & O’Brien, W. (2007). Management of construction firm performance using benchmarking. Journal of Management in Engineering, 23, pp. 10-17.

  • Green Building Council of Australia. (2017). Green Star - Design & As Built v1.2 Submission Guidelines. Green Building Council of Australia, Sydney.

  • Hinze, J., Thurman, S., & Wehle, A. (2013). Leading indicators of construction safety performance. Safety Science, 51, pp. 23-28.

  • Jablonowski, C. (2011). Identification of HSE leading indicators using regression analysis. In: SPE Americas E&P Health, Safety, Security, and Environmental Conference. Society of Petroleum Engineers, Houston.

  • Jastaniah, Y. (1997). Performance evaluation and benchmarking of construction industry projects using data envelopment analysis. PhD dissertation, Southern Methodist University.

  • Kaplan, R., & Norton, D. (1992). The balanced scorecard measures that drive performance. Harvard Business Review, 70, pp. 71-79.

  • Kim, S. Y., & Huynh, T. A. (2008). Improving project management performance of large contractors using benchmarking approach. International Journal of Project Management, 26, pp. 758-769.

  • KPI Working Group. (2000). KPI Report for the Minister for Construction. Department of the Environment, Transport and Regions, West Yorkshire.

  • Kunz, J., & Fischer, M. (2012). Virtual Design and Construction: Themes, Case Studies and Implementation Suggestions. Center for Integrated Facility Engineering (CIFE), Stanford University, Stanford.

  • National Research Council. (2005). Measuring Performance and Benchmarking Project Management at the Department of Energy. The National Academies Press, Washington, DC.

  • Navarro Sánchez, R. (2010). Creación de un “Balanced ScoreCard” para la dirección integrada de proyectos de construcción. BS dissertation, Universidad Politécnica de Cataluña.

  • Orihuela, P., & Orihuela, J. (2014). Needs, values and post-occupancy evaluation of housing project customers: a pragmatic view. Procedia Engineering, 85, pp. 412-419.

  • Orihuela, P., Pacheco, S., Aguilar, R., & Orihuela, J. (2016). Propuesta de Indicadores de Resultado para Proyectos de Edificación. In: VII Encuentro Latinoamericano de Gestión y Economía en la Construcción. Universidad de Los Andes, Bogotá, pp. 407-416.

  • Pillai, A., Joshi, A., & Rao, K. (2002). Performance measurement of R&D projects in a multi- project, concurrent engineering environment. International Journal of Project Management, 20, pp. 165-177.

  • Ramírez, R., Alarcón, L., & Knights, P. (2004). Benchmarking system for evaluating management practices in the construction industry. Journal of Management in Engineering, 20, pp. 110-117.

  • Rankin, J., Fayek, A., Meade, G., Haas, C., & Manseau, A. (2008). Initial metrics and pilot program results for measuring the performance of the Canadian construction industry. Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, 35, pp. 849-907.

  • Roberts, M., & Latorre, V. (2009). KPIs in the UK’s construction industry: using system dynamics to understand undera­chievement. Revista de la Construcción, 8, pp. 69-82.

  • Skibniewski, M., & Ghosh, S. (2009). Determination of key performance indicators with enterprise resource planning systems in engineering construction firms. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 135, pp. 965-978.

  • Suk, S., Hwang, B., Caldas, C., Dai, J., & Mulva, S. (2012). Performance dashboard for a pharmaceutical project benchmarking program. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 138, pp. 864-876.

  • Toellner, J. (2001). Improving safety and health performance: identifying and measuring leading indicators. Professional Safety, 46, pp. 42-47.

  • Toor, S., & Ogunlana, S. (2010). Beyond the “iron triangle”: stakeholder perception of key performance indicators (KPIs) for large-scale public sector development projects. International Journal of Project Management, 28, pp. 228-236.

  • US Green Building Council. (2013). LEED Reference Guide for Building Design and Construction. US Green Building Council, Washington, D. C..

  • Ward, S., Curtis, B., & Chapman, C. (1991). Objectives and performance in construction projects. Construction Management and Economics, 9, pp. 343-353.

  • Wideman, R. M. (2004). The Role of the Project Life Cycle (Life Span) in Project Management. AEW Services, Vancouver.

  • Wong, C. (2004). Contractor performance prediction model for the United Kingdom construction contractor: study of logistic regression approach. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 130, pp. 691-698.

Organization, Technology and Management in Construction: an International Journal

Co-published with University of Zagreb, Faculty of Civil Engineering

Journal Information


All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 19 19 19
PDF Downloads 3 3 3