The need for simulation in complex industrial systems

Open access

We discuss the concept of simulation and its application in the resolution of problems in complex industrial systems. Most problems of serious scale, be it an inventory problem, a production and distribution problem, a management of resources or process improvement, all real world problems require a mix of generic, data algorithmic and Ad-hoc solutions making the best of available information. We describe two projects in which analytical solutions were applied or contemplated. The first case study uses linear programming in the optimal allocation of advertising resources by a major internet service provider. The second study, in a series of projects, analyses options for the expansion of the production and distribution network of mining products, as part of a sensitive strategic business review. Using the examples, we make the case for the need of simulation in complex industrial problems where analytical solutions may be attempted but where the size and complexity of the problem forces a Monte Carlo approach.

Aboura, K., Sparks, R. & Welgama, P. (1994). CSIRO collaboration with ICI Explosives on development of a facilities planning system for AN explosives services to mining; Report on evaluation of Yarwun alternatives. CSIRO. (Confidential Report No. DMS-D 95/65).

Aboura, K., Sparks, R. & Welgama, P. (1995a). CSIRO collaboration with ICI Explosives on the ammonium nitrate inventory and distribution study. CSIRO. (Confidential Report No. DMS-D 95/88).

Aboura, K., Sparks, R. & Welgama, P. (1995b). CSIRO collaboration with ICI Explosives on the Yarwun ammonium nitrate study. CSIRO. (Confidential Report No. DMS-D 95/66).

Aboura, K., Eskandarian, A. & Lomita, D. (2001). Dynamic allocation of web advertising resources. Theoretica Inc. (Technical Report 2001).

Cohen, M.A., Tekerian, A., Kamesam, P., Lee, H. & Kleindorfer, P. (1990). OPTIMIZER: IBM’s Multi-echelon inventory system for managing service logistics. Interfaces. 20(1), 65-82,

Cox, D.R. & Miller, H.D. (1977). The Theory of Stochastic Processes. London: Chapman and Hall

Fiacco, A.V. & McCormick, G.P. (1990). Nonlinear programming: Sequential unconstrained minimization technique. Philadelphia: Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics.

Forrester, J.W. (1961). Industrial dynamics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Klee, V. & Minty, G.J. (1972). How good is the Simplex algorithm in inequalities. In Shisha, O. (Ed.), Inequalities, III (159-175). New York: Academic Press

Kljajić M., Bernik I. & Škraba A. (2000). Simulation approach to decision assessment in enterprises. Simulation. 75(4), 199-210,

Kljajić M., Bernik I., Škraba A. & Leskovar R. (2001). Integral simulation approach to decision assessment in enterprises, Shaping future with simulation. In the 4th International Eurosim 2001 Congress. Delft University of Technology.

Kljajić M., Breskvar U. & Bernik I. (2002). Production Planning Using a Simulation Model and Genetic Algorithms. IASTED, Modelling and simulation. 54-58.

Kljajić, M. & Kofjač, D. (2006). The virtual reality as an anticipative concept in warehouse optimization in uncertain environment. AIP Conf. Proc. 839, 314-321,

Kofjač, D. & Kljajić M. (2008). Application of genetic algorithms and visual simulation in a real-case production optimization. WSEAS Transactions on Systems and Control archive. 3(12), 992-1001.

Rardin, R. L. (1998). Optimization in Operations Research. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, Inc.

Ross, S. M. (2006). Simulation (4th edition). Burlington, MA: Elsevier Academic Press

Saaty, T.L. (1990). Multicriteria decision making; The analytic hierarchy process. Pittsburgh, PA: RWS Publications

Sherbrooke, C. (2004). Optimal inventory modeling of systems; Multi-echelon techniques. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers

Welgama, P., Mills, R.G., Aboura, K., Struthers, A. & Tucker, D. (1996). Evaluating options to increase production of a copper smelter aisle: A simulation approach. Simulation. 67(4), 247-267,


Journal of Management, Informatics and Human Resources

Journal Information

CiteScore 2018: 0.87

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2018: 0.179
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2018: 0.529


All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 195 107 6
PDF Downloads 65 52 6