Latvian Migrants’ Circular or Permanent Migration to Norway:

Economic and Social Factors

Open access


This article analyses migration decisions and labour market manoeuvring of Latvian migrants to Norway, as well as the economic and social conditions that influence their choices. How do they adapt to the labour market in Norway? Do they practise circular migration, or do they aim for more permanent settlement? For some circular migrants, ‘reinforced’ motivation for migration emerges gradually, partly related to differences in working conditions – lower workload, better enforcement of work-safety regulations and opportunities for specialising in their field. Family and networks can influence both return and permanent settlement, depending on whether these are based in the home country or in Norway.

Apsīte-Beriņa, E 2013, ‘International migration in the European Union: emigration from Latvia to the United Kingdom’, PhD Thesis, University of Latvia, Riga.

Boyd, M 1989, ‘Family and personal networks in international migration: recent developments and new agendas, International Migration Review, vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 638-670.

Burrell, K 2010, ‘Staying, returning, working and living: key themes in current academic research undertaken in the UK on migration movements from Eastern Europe’, Social Identities, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 297-308, DOI: 10.1080/13504630.2010.482401.

Bygnes, S & Erdal, MB 2017, Liquid migration, grounded lives: considerations about future mobility and settlement among Polish and Spanish migrants in Norway, Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, vol. 43, no. 1, pp. 102-118.

Cairns, D 2014, Youth transitions, international student mobility and spatial reflexivity, Palgrave Macmillan, New York.

Ciupijus, Z 2011, ‘Mobile central eastern Europeans in Britain: successful European Union citizens and disadvantaged labour migrants?’ Work, Employment and Society, vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 540-550.

Constant, AF & Zimmermann, KF 2011, ‘Circular and repeat migration: counts of exits and years away from the host country’, Population Research and Policy Review, vol. 30, no. 4, pp. 495-515, DOI: 10.1007/s11113-010-9198-6.

Creighton, MJ 2013, ‘The role of aspirations in domestic and international migration’, The Social Science Journal, vol. 50, pp. 79-88.

Daukšas, D 2013, ‘Lithuanians in Norway: between “here’ and “there”’, Urbanities, vol. 3, no.2, pp. 51-68.

De Jong, GF 2000, ‘Expectations, gender, and norms in migration decision-making’, Population Studies, vol. 54, no.3, pp. 307-319, DOI: 10.1080/713779089.

De Jong GF & Fawcett, JT 1983, ‘Motivations for migration: an assessment and a value-expectancy research model’ in Migration Decision Making: Multidisciplinary Approaches to Micro-level Studies in Developed and Developing Countries, eds. GF De Jong & RW Gardner, Pergamon, New York.

Dølvik, JE & Eldring, L 2008, Mobility of labour from new EU states to the Nordic region: developments, trends and consequences, Nordic Council of Ministers, Copenhagen.

Engbersen, G, Leerkes A, Grabowska-Lusinska I, Snel E & Burgers J 2013, ‘On the differential attachments of migrants from Central and Eastern Europe: a typology of labour migration’, Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, vol. 39, no. 6, pp. 959-981, DOI: 10.1080/1369183X.2013.765663.

Engbersen, G, Snel, E & de Boom J 2010, ‘A van full of Poles: liquid migration from Eastern and Central European countries’ in A continent moving west? EU enlargement and labour migration from Central and Eastern Europe, eds. R Black, G Engbersen, M Okólski & C Panţîru, Amsterdam University Press, pp. 115-140.

Faist, T 2010, ‘The crucial meso-level’ in Selected Studies in International Migration and Immigrant Incorporation, eds. M Martiniello & J Rath, Amsterdam University Press, pp. 59-90.

Fangen, K & Mohn, F 2010, ‘Norway: the pitfalls of egalitarianism’, in Inclusion and exclusion of young adult immigrants: barriers and bridges, eds. K Fangen, K Fossan & F Mohn, Ashgate, London

Favell, A 2008, ‘The new face of East–West migration in Europe’, Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, vol. 34, no. 5, pp. 701-716, DOI: 10.1080/13691830802105947.

Fouarge, D & Ester P 2009, ‘Understanding migration decisions in Eastern and Western Europe: perceived costs and benefits of mobility’, in Migration and mobility in Europe. Trends, patterns and control, eds. H Fassmann, M Haller & D Lane. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, pp. 51-72.

Friberg, JH 2012a, ‘The stages of migration. From going abroad to settling down: post-accession Polish migrant workers in Norway’, Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, vol. 38, no.10, pp. 1589-1605, DOI: 10.1080/1369183X.2012.711055.

Friberg, JH 2012b, ‘The guest worker syndrome revisited: Migration and employment among Polish workers in Oslo’, Nordic Journal of Migration Research, vol. 2, no. 4, 316-324, DOI: 10.2478/v10202-012-0002-z.

Galgóczi, B, Leschke J & Watt A 2011, ‘Intra-EU labour migration: flows, effects and policy responses’. Working Paper 2009.03. 2011 spring update, European Trade Union Institute, Brussels.

Glick Schiller, N 2011, ‘A global perspective on migration and development’ in The Migration–Development Nexus: A Transnational Perspective, eds. T Faist, M Fauser & P Kivisto, Palgrave Macmillan, London, pp. 29-56.

Granovetter, MS 1973, ‘The strength of weak ties’, American Journal of Sociology, vol. 78 no. 6, pp. 1360-1380.

Halfacree, A 2004, ‘Utopian imagination in migration’s Terra Incognita? Acknowledging the non-economic worlds of migration decision-making’, Population, Space and Place, 10, pp. 239-253.

Haug, S 2008, ‘Migration networks and migration decision-making’, Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, vol. 34, no. 4, pp. 585-605, DOI: 10.1080/13691830801961605.

Hazans, M 2016, ‘Migration experience of the Baltic countries in the context of the economic crisis’ in Labour migration, EU enlargement and the great recession, ed. M Hazans, Springer, Berlin pp. 297-344.

Hazans, M & Philips K 2011, ‘The post-enlargement migration experience in the Baltic labor markets’. IZA Discussion Paper Series (No. 5878).

Kley, S 2011, ‘Explaining the stages of migration within a life-course framework’, European Sociological Review, vol. 27, no.4, pp. 469-486, DOI:10.1093/esr/jcq020.

Krisjane, Z, Apsite-Berina, E & Berzins M 2016, ‘Circularity within the EU: the return intentions of Latvian migrants’ in Return Migration and Regional Development in Europe: Mobility Against the Stream, eds. R Nader, Z Kovács, B Glorius & T Lang, Palgrave Macmillan, London, pp. 215-240.

Kumpikaitė-Valiūnienė, V 2018, ‘Four Lithuanian emigration waves: comparison analysis of the main host countries’, Diaspora Network in International Business, online first, pp. 159-181.

Lehmann, H, Razzolini, T & Zaikeva, A 2017, ‘Internal devaluation and labour market outcomes: the case of Latvia’, Quaderni Working Paper, University of Bologna.

Lundholm, E, Garvill, J, Malmberg, G & Westin, K 2004, ‘Forced or free movers? The motives, voluntariness and selectivity of interregional migration in the Nordic countries’, Population, Space and Place, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 59-72.

Lutz, H 2010, ‘Gender in the migratory process’, Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, vol. 36, no. 10, pp. 1647-1663.

Massey, DS, Arango, J, Hugo, G, Kouaouci, A, Pellegrino, A & Taylor, JE 1993, ‘Theories of international migration: a review and appraisal’, Population and Development Review, vol. 19, no. 3: 431-466.

McCollum, D, Shubin, S, Apsite, E & Krisjane, Z 2013, ‘Rethinking labour migration channels: the experience of Latvia from EU accession to economic regression’, Population, Space and Place, vol. 19, no. 6: 688-702.

Newland, K, Aguinas, D & Terrazas, A 2008, Learning by doing: experiences of circular migration, Washington DC: Migration Policy Institute.

OECD 2014, Recruiting Immigrant Workers: Norway 2014. OECD, Paris.

Pollard, N, Lattore, M & Sriskandarajah, D 2008, Floodgates or turnstiles? Post-EU enlargement migration flows to (and from) the UK, Institute for Public Policy Research, London.

Pries, L 2016, ‘Circular migration as (New) strategy in migration policy? Lessons from historical and sociological migration research’ in Return migration and regional development in Europe: mobility against the stream, eds. R Nader, Z Kovács, B Glorius & T Lang, Palgrave Macmillan, London, pp. 25–54.

Skeldon, R 2010, ‘Managing migration for development: is circular migration the answer?’ Whitehead Journal of Diplomacy and International Relations, vol. 11, pp. 21-33.

Statistics Norway 2018, Immigrants and Norwegian-born to immigrant parents. Available from: (Accessed on December 4th 2018).

van Der Velde, M & Naerssen, TV (eds.) 2015, Mobility and migration choices. Thresholds to crossing borders, Aldershot, Ashgate.

White, A & Ryan, I. 2008, ‘Polish “temporary” Z migration: the formation and significance of social networks’, Europe-Asia Studies, vol. 60, no. 9, pp. 1467-502.

Widding Isaksen, L 2012, ‘Transnational spaces of care: migrant nurses in Norway’, Social Politics, vol. 19, no. 1: 58-77.

Žabko, O, Aasland, A & Endresen, SB 2018, ‘Facilitating labour migration from Latvia: strategies of various categories of intermediaries’, Journal of Ethnic Migration Studies, vol. 44, no. 4, pp. 575-591.

Zimmerman, K 1996, ‘European migration: push and pull’, International Regional Science Review, vol. 19, nos. 1&2, pp. 95-128.

Journal Information


All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 461 461 91
PDF Downloads 95 95 29