The Marriage Route to Migration: of border artistes, transnational matchmaking and imported spouses
In preindustrial society, marriage was part of the family economy and as such a major instrument for building alliances to stabilise or improve status and wealth. It was only in the 18th and 19th centuries, and in Western societies, that romantic love became the normative foundation of marriage. Yet in other parts of the world marriage patterns continue to follow a different script. Moreover, as a result of present-day globalisation and migration, the instrumental value of marriage is spreading again and gaining new importance. Two trends are playing a major role here. On the one hand, as economic and political conditions in many regions of the world deteriorate, many people build their hopes on migration. On the other hand, Western countries try to limit migration by setting up very restrictive rules, with family unification becoming the last chance for entry. In response, young men and women in many parts of the world are redirecting their wishes and ambitions by placing their hopes in marriage, or more specifically, on marriage in accordance with migration rules. Here the first imperative is that the candidate must be a native of the West or a legal resident there.
Appadurai, A 1991, ‘Global Ethnoscapes: Notes and Queries for a Transnational Anthropology’, in Recapturing anthropology: working in the present, ed. RG Fox, School of American Research Press, Santa Fe, pp. 191-210.
Ballard, R 1990, ‘Migration and kinship: the differential effect of marriage rules on the processes of Punjabi migration to Britain’, in South Asians overseas: migration and ethnicity, eds C Clarke, C Peach & St. Vertovec, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 219-249.
Ballard, R 2008, ‘Inside and outside: contrasting perspectives on the dynamics of kinship and marriage in contemporary South Asian transnational networks’, in The family in question: immigrant and ethnic minorities in multicultural Europe, ed. G Ralph, Amsterdam University Press, Amsterdam, pp. 37-70.
Beck, U 2006, The cosmopolitan vision, Polity Press, Cambridge. Original German edition 2004, Der kosmopolitische Blick, Suhrkamp, Frankfurt.
Beck-Gernsheim, E 2006, ‘Turkish brides: a look at the immigration debate in Germany’, in Migration, Citizenship, Ethnos, eds YM Bodemann & G. Yurdakul, Palgrave Macmillan, New York, pp. 185-194.
Beck-Gernsheim, E 2007, Türkische Bräute und andere Opfergeschichten, in Wir und die Anderen: Über Kopftuch, Zwangsheirat und andere Mißverständnisse, Elisabeth Beck-Gernsheim, Suhrkamp, Frankfurt, pp. 74-83.
Bledsoe, CH 2004, ‘Reproduction at the margins: migration and legitimacy in the New Europe’, Demographic Research, Special Collection vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 87-116.
Böcker, A 1994, ‘Chain migration over legally closed borders: settled migrants as bridgeheads and gatekeepers’, The Netherlands' Journal of Social Sciences, vol. 30, pp. 87-106.
Fleischer, A 2007, ‘Family, obligations, and migration: the role of kinship in Cameroon’, Demographic Research, vol. 16, article 13, pp. 413-440.
Jensen, A-M 2008, ‘Thai women in the Arctic North’. Paper presented at the conference ‘Gender at the interface of the Global and the Local’, November 4-7, Kunming, China.
Kalpagam, U 2008, ‘America Varan marriages among Tamil brahmins: preferences, strategies and outcomes’, in Marriage, migration and gender, eds R Palwirala & P Uberoi, Sage, London, pp. 98-124.
Kelek, N 2005, Die fremde Braut: Ein Bericht aus dem Inneren des türkischen Lebens in Deutschland. Kiepenheur & Witsch, Köln.
Kofman, E 2004, ‘Family-related migration: a critical review of European studies’, Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, vol. 30, no. 2, 243-262.
Lash, S & Urry, J 2007, Globale Kulturindustrie, Suhrkamp, Frankfurt.
Lauser, A 2004, ‘Ein guter Mann ist harte Arbeit’: Eine ethnographische Studie zu philippinischen Heiratsmigrantinnen, Transcript, Bielefeld.
Lu, MC-w 2008, ‘Commercially arranged marriage migration: case studies of cross-border marriages in Taiwan’, in Marriage, migration and gender eds R Palwirala & P Uberoi, Sage, London, pp. 125-151.
Nazario, S 2004, Enrique's journey: the story of a boy's dangerous odyssey to reunite with his mother, Random House, New York.
Newsletter Migration und Bevölkerung 2008, ‘Familiennachzug: Ehepartner scheitern am Sprachtest’, no. 10, December.
Onishi, N 2007, ‘Also globalized: Asia's marriage market’, International Herald Tribune, February 2.
Palriwala, R & Uberoi, P 2008, ‘Exploring the links: gender issues in marriage and migration’, in Marriage, migration and gender, eds R Palwirala & P Uberoi, Sage, London, pp. 23-62.
Schiller, NG, Basch, L & Blanc-Szanton, C 1999, ‘Transnationalism: a new analytic framework for understanding migration’, in Migration, Diasporas and Transnationalism, eds S Vertovec & R Cohen, Elgar Reference Collection, Cheltenham/Northampton, pp. 1-49.
Scott, JC 1990, Domination and the arts of resistance, Yale University Press, Yale, CT.
Shaw, A 2001, ‘Kinship, cultural preference and immigration: consanguineous marriage among British Pakistanis’, Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, vol. 7, pp. 315-334.
Shaw, A 2004, ‘Immigrant families in the UK’, in The Blackwell Companion to the Sociology of Families, eds J Scott, J Treas & M Richards, Blackwell, Malden, MA, pp. 270-285.
Shim, Y-H 2008, ‘Transnational marriages in Korea: trends, issues, and adaption process’, Gender and Society, vol. 65, no. 7, pp. 45-90.
Terkessidis, M & Karakasoglu, Y 2006, Gerechtigkeit für die Muslime! Die Zeit, no. 6, February 1.
UNFPA 2006, Passage to hope: women and international migration. State of World Population.
Walt, V 2008, ‘Field of dreams’, Time, June 30, pp. 42-49.
Yurdakul, G 2009, From guest workers into Muslims: the transformation of Turkish immigrant associations in Germany, Cambridge Scholars Publishing, Newcastle.