Interdisciplinary definitions of corruption perceive corrupt actions as contrary to legal and ethical standards affecting the public interest, perpetrated by a person in public office. The main goal of the study is to identify the factors of corrupt acts in the public sector stemming from the economic, political, cultural and social environments in the Slovak Republic. Through the Delphi method we verify the relevance of economic, political and cultural-social factors of corrupt acts in the public sector defined in the theoretical framework of this issue. The Delphi method was used under the following conditions: the anonymity of experts, feedback control and statistical determination of a consensus of experts. Expert evaluation of the factors underlying corrupt behaviour in the public sector enabled us not only to detect the overall relevance of the factors, but also to identify areas where corruption in the public sector is most widespread, according to experts. We can state that the most problematic areas include the judiciary and the police.
Buchanan, J. M. 1996. Hranice slobody: Medzi anarchiou a Leviatanom. Bratislava: Archa.
Cartier-Bresson, J. 1997. “Corruption Network, Transaction Security and Illegal Social Exchange.” Political Studies Review 45(3), 463–476.
Cause, W. 2002. Politics in Southeast Asia: Democracy or Less. New York: Routledge.
Chaufen, A. 2012. “Economic Freedom and Corruption.” Conservative Letters, M. R. Stefanik Conservative Institute. Available at http://www.institute.sk/article.php?4490 (last accessed 14 November 2014).
Klitgaard, R. E. 1998. Controling Corruption. California: University of California Press.
Klučka, J. 2009. Plánovanie a prognostika v aplikáciách. Žilina: Žilinská univerzita v Žiline.
Lambsdorff, J., G. and P. Cornelius. 2000. “Corruption, Foreign Investment and Growth.” In K. Schwab et al. (eds). The Africa Competitiveness Report 2000/2001. World Economic Forum and the Institute for International Development. Available at http://www.weforum.org/reports (last accessed 1 January 2013).
Prud’homme, R. 1995. “The Dangers of Decentralization.” In World Bank Research Observer 10(2), 201–220.
Reichel, J. 2009. Kapitoly metodologie sociálních výzkumů. Praha: Grada Publishing.
Rijckeghem, C. and B. Weder. 1997. “Corruption and the Rate of Temptation: Do Low Wages in the Civil Service Cause Corruption?” International Monetary Fund Working Paper. Available at http://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/wp/wp9773.pdf (last accessed 5 January 2013).
Rimarčík, M. 2007. Štatistika pre prax. Košice: Marián Rimarčík.
Ríos-Figueroa, J. 2012. “Justice System Institutions and Corruption Control: Evidence from Latin America.” Justice System Journal 33(2), 195–214.
Robinson, R. and V. Hadiz. 2004. Reorganising Power in Indonesia. New York: Routledge Curzon.
Tanzi, V. 1996. “Fiscal Federalism and Decentralization: A Review of Some Efficiency and Macroeconomic Aspects.” In M. Bruno and B. Pleskovic (eds). Annual World Bank Conference on Development Economics 1996. Washington D.C.: World Bank, 295–315.