We examine the purchasing power parity (PPP) hypothesis of 10 members of ASEAN. A battery of panel unit root tests is employed on data series from January 1995 to January 2018 in order to search for validity of PPP in the period before the Great Recession and in the post-crisis period. All the calculations are based on four numeraire currencies: Chinese yuan (CNY), Japanese yen (JPY), US dollar (USD), and the euro (EUR). First, following the outcome of the present study for ASEAN countries, the PPP holds mostly with respect to CNY rates. Second, for the post-financial crisis period, our research proves conclusively that the PPP supposition is predominantly valid between the currencies of ASEAN countries and EUR rates. The sample of countries in the study is limited to the ASEAN group of economies. Based on the evaluated parity conditions, the emergence of global economic crisis brought about significant currency shifts in the ASEAN. The selection and testing of a broader range of numeraire currencies is vital to provide empirical underpinning for PPP notion.
Arize, A. C., Malindretos, J., & Ghosh, D. (2015). Purchasing Power Parity-Symmetry and Proportionality: Evidence from 116 Countries. International Review of Economics and Finance, 37(C), 69–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2014.11.014
Boršič, D., & Bekő, J. (2018). Purchasing power parity in ASEAN+3: an application of panel unit root tests. Croatian review of economic, business and social statistics, 4(1), 42-52.
Breitung, J. (2000). The Local Power of Some Unit Root Tests for Panel Data, in Advances in Econometrics, Vol. 15: Nonstationary Panels, Panel Cointegration, and Dynamic Panels, Baltagi B.(Ed.), JAI Press, Amsterdam, 161–178.
Choji, N. M., & Sek, S. K. (2017). Testing for Purchasing Power Parity for ASEAN-5 Using Asymmetric Cointegration Tests. International Journal of Advanced and Applied Sciences, 11(4), 155–159. https://doi.org/10.21833/ijaas.2017.011.025
Feng, J. (2018). On the Cusp. Finance & Development, 55(3), 34–35.
Fisher, R. A. (1932). Statistical Methods for Research Workers, Oliver&Boyd, Edinburgh.
Froot, K. A., & Rogoff, K. (1995). Perspectives on PPP and Long-Run Real Exchange Rates, In Handbook of International Economics Vol. III, Grossman, G., Rogoff, K. (Ed), Elsevier Science, pp. 1647–1688.
Lau, C. K. M., Suvankulov, F., Su, Y., & Chau, F. (2012). Some Cautions on the Use of Nonlinear Panel Unit Root Tests: Evidence from a Modified Series-Specific Non-Linear Panel Unit-Root Test. Economic Modelling, 29(3), 810–816. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2011.08.006
Maddala, G. S., & Wu, S. (1999). A Comparative Study of Unit Root Tests with Panel and a New Simple Test. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 61(0), 631–653.
Munir, Q., & Kok, S. C. (2015). Purchasing Power Parity of ASEAN-5 Countries Revisited: Heterogeneity, Structural Breaks and Cross-sectional Dependence. Global Economic Review, 44(1), 116–149. https://doi.org/10.1080/1226508X.2015.1012091
Zhou, S., & Kutan, A. M. (2011). Is the Evidence for PPP Reliable? A Sustainability Examination of the Stationarity of Real Exchange Rates. Journal of Banking & Finance, 35(9), 2479–2490. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2011.02.006