CGCI-SIFT: A More Efficient and Compact Representation of Local Descriptor

Open access

This paper proposes a novel invariant local descriptor, a combination of gradient histograms with contrast intensity (CGCI), for image matching and object recognition. Considering the different contributions of sub-regions inside a local interest region to an interest point, we divide the local interest region around the interest point into two main sub-regions: an inner region and a peripheral region. Then we describe the divided regions with gradient histogram information for the inner region and contrast intensity information for the peripheral region respectively. The contrast intensity information is defined as intensity difference between an interest point and other pixels in the local region. Our experimental results demonstrate that the proposed descriptor performs better than SIFT and its variants PCA-SIFT and SURF with various optical and geometric transformations. It also has better matching efficiency than SIFT and its variants PCA-SIFT and SURF, and has the potential to be used in a variety of realtime applications.

[1] Lowe, D.G. (2004). Distinctive image features from scale-invariant keypoints. International Journal ofComputer Vision, 60 (2), 91-110.

[2] Strecha, Ch., Bronstein, A.M. (2012). LDAHash: Improved matching with smaller descriptors. IEEETransactions on Pattern Analysis and MachineIntelligence, 34 (1), 66-78.

[3] Senchenko, E.S., Chugui, Yu.V. (2011). Shadow inspection of 3D objects in partially coherent light. Measurement Science Review, 11 (4), 104-107.

[4] Jin Guofeng, Zhang Wei, Yang Zhengwei et al. (2012). Image segmentation of thermal waving inspection based on particle swarm optimization fuzzy clustering algorithm. Measurement Science Review, 12 (6), 296-301.

[5] Harris, Ch., Stephens, M. (1988). A combined corner and edge detector. In Proceedings of the 4th AlveyVision Conference, 147-151.

[6] Mikolajczyk, K., Schmid, C. (2005). A performance evaluation of local descriptors. IEEE Transactions onPattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 27 (10), 1615-1630.

[7] Bay, H., Ess, A., Tuytelaars, T., Gool, L.V. (2008). SURF: Speeded up robust features. Computer Visionand Image Understanding, 10 (3), 346-359.

[8] Yan Ke, Sukthankar, R. (2004). PCA-SIFT: A more distinctive representation for local image descriptors. In Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR2004), 27 June- 2 July 2004. IEEE, Vol. 2, 506-513.

[9] Mortensen, E.N., Deng Hongli, Shapiro, L. (2005). A SIFT descriptor with global context. In ComputerVision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR 2005), 20-25 June 2005. IEEE, Vol. 1, 184-190.

[10] Tola, E., Lepetit, V., Fua, P. (2010). Daisy: An efficient dense descriptor applied to wide baseline stereo. IEEETransactions on Pattern Analysis and MachineIntelligence, 32 (5), 815-830.

[11] Yang Duanduan, Sluzek, A. (2010). A lowdimensional local descriptor incorporating TPS warping for image matching. Image & VisionComputing, 28 (8), 1184-1195.

[12] Tuytelaars, T., Mikolajczyk, K. (2008). Local invariant feature detectors: A survey. Computer Graphics andVision, 3 (3), 177-280.

[13] Rabbani, H. (2011). Statistical modeling of low SNR magnetic resonance images in wavelet domain using laplacian prior and two-sided rayleigh noise for visual quality improvement. Measurement Science Review, 11 (4), 125-130.

[14] Xianqing Lei, Chunyang Zhang, Yujun Xue, Jishun Li. (2011). Roundness error evaluation algorithm based on polar coordinate transform. Measurement, 44 (2), 345-350.

[15] Bai Cong, Kpalma Kidiyo, Ronsin Joseph. (2011). Analysis of histogram descriptor for image retrieval in DCT domain. In Intelligent Interactive MultimediaSystems and Services. Springer, Vol. 11, 227-235.

[16] Huang, C.R., Chen, C.R., Chung, P.C. (2008). Contrast context histogram an efcient discriminating local descriptor for object recognition and image matching. Pattern Recognition, 41 (10), 3071-3077.

[17] Mikolajczyk, K., Tuytelaars, T., Schmid, C., Zisserman, A. (2005). A comparison of affine region detectors. International Journal of Computer Vision, 65 (1/2), 43-72.

Measurement Science Review

The Journal of Institute of Measurement Science of Slovak Academy of Sciences

Journal Information

IMPACT FACTOR 2017: 1.345
5-year IMPACT FACTOR: 1.253

CiteScore 2017: 1.61

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2017: 0.441
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2017: 0.936


All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 124 123 4
PDF Downloads 34 34 1