Determinants of Default in Lithuanian Peer-To-Peer Platforms

Open access


The article analyses the factors that determine the probability of debtors’ default in the Lithuanian peer-to-peer market. The results of this study are compared with previous research.

1. Barasinska, N., Schäfer, D. (2014). Is Crowdfunding Different? Evidence on the Relation Between Gender and Funding Success from a German Peer-To-Peer Lending Platform // German Economic Review. Vol. 15, No. 4, pp. 436–452.

2. Cai, S., Lin, X., Xu, D., Fu, X. (2016). Judging Online Peer-to-Peer Lending Behavior: A Comparison of First-Time and Repeated Borrowing Requests // Information & Management. Vol. 53, No. 7, pp. 857–867.

3. Davis, K., Murphy, J. (2016). Peer to Peer Lending: Structures, Risks and Regulation. Internet access:

4. Ding, J., Huang, J., Li, Y., Meng, M. (2018). Is There an Effective Reputation Mechanism in Peer-to-Peer Lending? Evidence from China // Finance Research Letters.

5. Emekter, R., Tu, Y., Jirasakuldech, B., Lu, M. (2015). Evaluating Credit Risk and Loan Performance in Online Peer-to-Peer (P2P) Lending // Applied Economics. Vol. 47, No. 1, pp. 54–70.

6. Fong, A. (2015). Regulation of Peer-to-Peer Lending in Hong Kong: State of Play // Law and Financial Markets Review. Vol. 9, No. 4, pp. 251–259.

7. Freedman, S., Jin, G. Z. (2017). The Information Value of Online Social Networks: Lessons from Peer-to-Peer Lending // International Journal of Industrial Organization. Vol. 51, pp. 185–222.

8. Funding Circle Statistics. Internet access:

9. Ge, R., Feng, J., Gu, B., Zhang, P. (2017). Predicting and deterring default with social media information in peer-to-peer lending // Journal of Management Information Systems. Vol. 34, No. 2, pp. 401–424.

10. Guo, Y., Zhou, W., Luo, C., Liu, C., Xiong, H. (2016). Instance-Based Credit Risk Assessment for Investment Decisions in P2P Lending // European Journal of Operational Research. Vol. 249, No. 2, pp. 417–426.

11. Lei, X. (2016). Discussion of the Risks and Risk Control of P2P in China // Modern Economy. Vol. 7, No. 04, pp. 399. doi: 10.4236/me.2016.74043

12. Lichtenwald, R. (2014). The History of Peer to Peer Lending. Peer and Social Lending. Internet access:

13. Lin, M., Prabhala, N. R., Viswanathan, S. (2013). Judging Borrowers by the Company they Keep: Friendship Networks and Information Asymmetry in Online Peer-to-Peer Lending // Management Science. Vol. 59, No. 1, pp. 17–35.

14. Lin, X., Li, X., Zheng, Z. (2017). Evaluating Borrower’s Default Risk in Peer-to-Peer Lending: Evidence from a Lending Platform in China // Applied Economics. Vol. 49, No. 35, pp. 3538–3545.

15. Liu, Y., Zhou, Q., Zhao, X., Wang, Y. (2018). Can Listing Information Indicate Borrower Credit Risk in Online Peer-to-Peer Lending? // Emerging Markets Finance and Trade. Vol. 54, No. 13, pp. 2982–2994.

16. Ma, H. Z., Wang, X. R. (2016). Influencing Factor Analysis of Credit Risk in P2P Lending Based on Interpretative Structural Modeling // Journal of Discrete Mathematical Sciences and Cryptography. Vol. 19, No. 3, pp. 777–786.

17. Malekipirbazari, M., Aksakalli, V. (2015). Risk Assessment in Social Lending Via Random Forests // Expert Systems with Applications. Vol. 42, No. 10, pp. 4621–4631.

18. Mateescu, A. (2015). Peer-to-Peer Lending. Data & Society Research Institute, pp. 19–25. Internet access:

19. Milne, A., Parboteeah, P. (2016). The Business Models and Economics of Peer-to-Peer Lending. Internet access:

20. Pokorna, M., Sponer, M. (2016). Social Lending and its Risks // Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences. Vol. 220, pp. 330–337.

21. Republic of Lithuania Law on Consumer Credit. No. XII-1989. Internet access:

22. Riggins, F. J., Weber, D. M. (2017). Information Asymmetries and Identification Bias in P2P Social Microlending // Information Technology for Development. Vol. 23, No. 1, pp. 107–126.

23. Serrano-Cinca, C., Gutierrez-Nieto, B., López-Palacios, L. (2015). Determinants of Default in P2P Lending // PloS One. Vol. 10, No. 10, pp. e0139427.

24. Wei, S. (2015). Internet Lending in China: Status Quo, Potential Risks and Regulatory Options // Computer Law & Security Review. Vol. 31, No. 6, pp. 793–809.

25. Wooldridge, J. M. (2003). Introductory Econometrics: A Modern Approach. – Australia; Cincinnati, Ohio: South-Western College Pub., c2003.

26. Zhang, Y., Li, H., Hai, M., Li, J., Li, A. (2017). Determinants of Loan Funded Successful in Online P2P Lending // Procedia Computer Science. Vol. 122, pp. 896–901.

Management of Organizations: Systematic Research

Organizacijų vadyba: sisteminiai tyrimai

Journal Information


All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 65 65 21
PDF Downloads 50 50 16