Presumptions of Decentralisation in the Context of Institutional and Political Economy

Open access


The aim of the article is to discuss and distinguish the notion of decentralisation within time, institutional economics and political organisation of States, as well as the role of decentralisation in the context of those political organisations. The differences between the notions of decentralisation and federalism are differentiated in order to avoid misinterpretations of the notions.

1. ADDCN. (2007). State Restructuring and Issues of Local Self Governance in Nepal. Internet access:

2. Bardhan, P. (2002). Decentralization of Governance and Development // Journal of Economic Perspectives. Vol. 16, No. 4, pp. 185–205. doi: 10.1257/089533002320951037.

3. Bird, R., Ebel R. (2007). Fiscal Fragmentation in Decentralized Countries. – Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

4. Bosch, N., Duran, J. (2008). Fiscal Federalism and Political Decentralisation. – Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

5. Brette, O. (2003). Thorstein Veblen’s Theory of Institutional Change: Beyond Technological Determinism // European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, Vol. 10, No. 3, pp. 455–477. doi: 10.1080/0967256032000106698.

6. Cheema, G. S., Rondinelli, D. (2007). From Government Decentralisation to Decentralised Governance / In Decentralising Governance: Emerging Concept and Practices ed. G. S. Cheema and D. Rondinelli. – Washington: Brookings Institution, pp. 1–20.

7. Dafflon, B., Madies, T. (2009). Décentralisation: quelques principes issus de la théorie du fédéralisme financier. [Decentralization: A Few Principles from the Theory of Fiscal Federalism.] Notes and documents 42. – Paris: Agence Française de Développement.

8. Devas, N. (2008). Decentralisation and the Implications for Local Government Finance / In Devas, N., Alam, M., Delay, S., Koranteng, RO and Venkatachalam, P., Financing Local Government, Commonwealth Secretariat. – London, pp. 11–23.

9. Dorfman, J. (1934). Thorstein Veblen and His America. – Cambridge: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.

10. Ebel R. D., Yilmaz, S. (2002). On the measurement and impact of fiscal decentralization // Policy Research Working Paper Series. No. 2809. Washington D.C.: World Bank.

11. European Charter of Self-Government (1985). Strasbourg: Council of Europe. Internet access:

12. Fleiner, T. (2000). Federalism: Basic Structure and Value of Switzerland Recent Developments In Swiss Federalism. Internet access:

13. Frank, J. (1986). The New Keynesian Economics: Unemployment, Search, and Contracting. – Bringhton: Wheatsheaf.

14. Hamilton, W. H. (1919). The Institutional Approach to Economic Theory // The American Economic Review. Vol. 9, No. 1, pp. 309–318.

15. Israel, A. (1992). Issues for Infrastructure Management in 1990s. Wold Bank Discussion Paper 171. Washington, D. C.

16. Martinez-Vazques, J. (2008). Revenue Assignments in the Practice of Fiscal Decentralisation / In Fiscal Federalism and Political Decentralisation, ed. N. Bosch and J. Duran. – Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

17. Martišius, S. (2005). Ekonominių teorijų raida 1870–1970 metais // Pinigų studijos. Ekonomikos teorija ir praktika. Nr. 2, pp. 47–57.

18. Maskin, E., Qian, Y., Xu, C. (2000). Incentives, Information, and Organizational Form // Review of Economic Studies. Vol. 67, No. 2, pp. 359–378. doi: 10.1111/1467-937X.00135

19. Oates, W.E. (1972) Fiscal Federalism. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.

20. Osei-Kufuor, P., Bakare I., A., O. (2013). Conceptualizing Institutionalised Decentralisation: Implications for Competing Theories in Development. International // Journal of Humanities and Social Science Invention. Vol. 2, No. 9, pp. 32–45.

21. Qian, Y., Roland, G. (1998). Federalism and the Soft Budget Constraint // American Economic Review. Vol. 88, No. 5, pp. 1143–1162. doi: 10.2139/ssrn.149988

22. Ribot, J. C. (2004). Waiting for Democracy: The Politics of Choice in Natural Resource Decentralisation. – Washington D.C.: World Resources Institute.

23. Seabright, P. (1996). Accountability and Decentralization in Government: An Incomplete Contract Model // European Economic Review. Vol. 40, No. 1, pp. 61–89. doi: 10.1016/0014-2921(95)00055-0.

24. Smoke, P. (2003). Decentralisation in Africa: Goals, Dimensions, Myths and Challenges // Public Administration and Development. Vol. 23, No. 1, pp. 7–16. doi: 10.1002/pad.255.

25. Sonin, K. (2003). Provincial Protectionism, CEFIR Mimeo. doi: 10.2139/ssrn.403960

26. Tanzi, V. (1996). Fiscal Federalism and Decentralization: A Review of some Efficiency and Macroeconomic Aspects. – Annual World Bank Conference on Development Economics, 1995. Washington, DC: World Bank, pp. 295–316.

27. Tanzi, V. (2000a). Fiscal Federalism and Decentralisation: A Review of Some Efficiency and Macroeconomic Aspects / In Policies, Institutions and the Dark Side of Economics, ed. V. Tanzi. – Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

28. Tanzi, V. (2000b). On Fiscal Federalism: Issues to Worry About. Internet access:

29. Tiebout, C. (1956). A Pure Theory of Local Expenditures // Journal of Political Economy. Vol. 64, No. 5, pp. 416–424. doi: 10.1086/257839.

30. Persson, T., Tabellini, G. (2000). Political Economics: Explaining Economic Policy. – Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

31. World Bank. (1990). Strengthening Local governments in Sub-Sacharan frica. E.D.I. Policy Seminar report. 21. – Washington D.C.: World Bank.

Management of Organizations: Systematic Research

Organizacijų vadyba: sisteminiai tyrimai

Journal Information


All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 27 27 18
PDF Downloads 20 20 14