Managerial Solutions that Increase the Effect of Group Synergy and Reduce Social Loafing

Open access

Abstract

Reduction of social loafing in the organization and increase of group synergy are integral objectives of human resource management, setting high requirements to the quality of managerial solutions. The purpose of this research is to develop managerial solutions that increase the effect of group synergy and reduce the spread of social loafing. The article analyses the concept of the social loafing phenomenon distinguishing the essential demotivators in work groups of organizations. The reasons of occurrence and existence of social loafing are analysed as well, differentiating them into groups. The authors also discuss beliefs and behaviour of employees in organizations that lead to the emergence and (or) suppression of the social loafing phenomenon. Based on a comparative and systemic logical analysis of scientific literature, as well as the results of empirical research, there are developed managerial solutions using the modelling method.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • 1. Barnes C. M. Hollenbeck J. R. Jundt D. K. DeRue S. D. Harmon S. J. (2011). Mixing Individual Incentives and Group Incentives: Best of Both Worlds or Social Dilemma? // Journal of Management. Vol. 34 No. 6 pp. 1611–1635. doi: 10.1177/0149206309360845.

  • 2. Baruah J. Paulus P. B. (2009). Enhancing Group Creativity: The Search for Synergy. In Elizabeth A. Mannix Jack A. Goncalo Margaret A. Neale (ed.) Creativity in Groups (Research on Managing Groups and Teams Volume 12) Emerald Group Publishing Limited pp. 29–56.

  • 3. Bluhm D. J. (2009). Adaptive Consequences of Social Loafing // Academy of Management Journal. Vol. 1 pp. 1–6. doi: 10.5465/AMBPP.2009.44256422.

  • 4. Brickner M. A. Harkins S. G. Ostrom T. M. (1986). Effects of Personal Involvement: Thought-Provoking Implications for Social Loafing // Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. Vol. 51 No. 4 pp. 763–769. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.51.4.763.

  • 5. Chen F. Zhang L. Latimer J. (2014). How much has My Co-Worker Contributed? The Impact of Anonymity and Feedback on Social Loafing in Asynchronous Virtual Collaboration // International Journal of Information Management. Vol. 34 No. 5 pp. 652–659. doi: 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2014.05.001.

  • 6. Chen X. P. Bachrach D. G. (2003). Tolerance of Free-Riding: The Effects of Defection Size Defection Pattern and Social Orientation in A Repeated Public Goods Dilema // Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. Vol. 90 No. 1 pp. 139–147. doi: 10.1016/S0749-5978(02)00511-3.

  • 7. Comer D. R. (1995). A Model of Social Loafing in Real Work Groups // Human Relations. Vol. 48 No. 6 pp. 647–667. doi: 10.1177/001872679504800603.

  • 8. Czyz S. H. Szmajke A. Kruger A. Kübler M. (2016). Participation in Team Sports can Eliminate the Effect of Social Loafing // Perceptual and Motor Skills. Vol. 123 No. 3 pp. 754–768. doi: 10.1177/0031512516664938.

  • 9. Diamond. P. (1987). Synergy: Working Together to Make One Plus One Equal Four // Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources. Vol. 25 No. 1 pp. 73–79. doi: 10.1177/103841118702500109

  • 10. Ferrante C. J. Green S. G. Forster W. R. (2006). Getting More Out of Team Projects: Incentivizing Leadership to Enhance Performance // Journal of Management Education. Vol. 30 No. 6 pp. 788–797. doi: 10.1177/1052562906287968.

  • 11. Gabriel Y. Griffiths D. S. (2008). International Learning Groups: Synergies and Dysfunctions // Management Learning. Vol. 39 No. 5 pp. 503–518. doi: 10.1177/1350507608096038.

  • 12. George J. M. (1992). Extrinsic and Intrinsic Origins of Perceived Social Loafing in Organizations // Academy of Management Journal. Vol. 35 No. 1 pp. 191–202. doi: 10.2307/256478.

  • 13. Guerin B. (1999). Social Behaviors as Determined by Different Arrangements of Social Consequences: Social Loafing Social Facilitation Deindividuation and a Modified Social Loafing // The Psychological Record. Vol. 49 No. 4 pp. 565–577. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF033.

  • 14. Heuzé J. P. Brunel P. C. (2011). Social Loafing in a Competitive Context // International Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology. Vol. 1 No. 3 pp. 246–263. doi:10.1080/1612197X.2003.9671717.

  • 15. Høigaard R. Säfvenbom R. Tønnessen F. E. (2006a). The Relationship between Group Cohesion Group Norms and Perceived Social Loafing in Soccer Teams // Small Group Research. Vol. 37 No. 3 pp. 217–232. doi: 10.1177/1046496406287311.

  • 16. Høigaard R. Tofteland I. Ommundsen Y. (2006b). The Effect of Team Cohesion on Social Loafing in Relay Teams // International Journal of Applied Sports Sciences. Vol. 18 No. 1 pp. 59–73.

  • 17. Hung T. K. Chi N. W. Lu W. L. (2009). Exploring the Relationships between Perceived Coworker Loafing and Counterproductive Work Behaviors: The Mediating Role of a Revenge Motive // Journal of Business and Psychology. Vol. 24 No. 3 pp. 257–270. doi: 10.1007/s10869-009-9104-6.

  • 18. Yoshimura M. Yoshikawa K. (1998). Synergy Effects of Sharing Knowledge During Cooperative Product Design // Concurrent Engineering. Vol. 6 No. 1 pp. 7–14. doi: 10.1177/1063293X9800600102.

  • 19. Jezerskytė E. Žydžiūnaitė V. (2005). Comparing Teamwork Competencies of the School Administration and Educators: The Aspects of Groupthink (Avoidance) and Social Loafing // Social Sciences. Vol. 49 No. 3 pp. 87–95.

  • 20. Jones G. W. Høigaard R. Peters D. M. (2014). “Just Going Through the Motions..”: A Qualitative Exploration of Athlete Perceptions of Social Loafing in Training and Competition Contexts – Implications for Team Sport Coaches // International Journal of Sports Science & Coaching. Vol. 9 No. 5 pp. 1067–1082. doi: 10.1260/1747-9541.9.5.1067.

  • 21. Karau S. J. Williams K. D. (1993). Social Loafing: A Meta-Analytic Review and Theoretical Integration // Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. Vol. 65 No. 4 pp. 681–706. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.65.4.681.

  • 22. Karau S. J. Williams K. D. (1995). Social Loafing: Research Findings Implications and Future Directions // Current Directions in Psychological Science. Vol. 4 No. 5 pp. 134–140. doi: 10.1111/1467-8721.ep10772570.

  • 23. Kovach K. A. Cathcart C. E. (1999). Human Resource Information Systems (HRIS): Providing Business with Rapid Data Access Information Exchange and Strategic Advantage // Public Personnel Management. Vol. 28 No. 2 pp. 275–282. doi: 10.1177/009102609902800208.

  • 24. Lam Ch. (2015). The Role of Communication and Cohesion in Reducing Social Loafing in Group Projects // Business and Professional Communication Quarterly. Vol. 78 No. 4 pp. 454–475. doi: 10.1177/2329490615596417.

  • 25. Larson J. R. (2007). Deep Diversity and Strong Synergy: Modeling the Impact of Variability in Members’ Problem-Solving Strategies on Group Problem-Solving Performance // Small Group Research. Vol. 38 No. 3 pp. 413–436. doi: 10.1177/1046496407301972.

  • 26. Latane B. Williams K. Harkins S. (1979). Many Hands Make Light the Work: The Causes and Consequences of Social Loafing // Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. Vol. 37 No. 6 pp. 822–832. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.37.6.822.

  • 27. Lee P. Ch. Chen Ch. M. Liou K. T. (2015). Using Citizens’ Leadership Behaviors to Enhance Worker Motivation: Reducing Perceived Social Loafing in a Coproductive Tax Service Program // Public Performance & Management Review. Vol. 39 No. 1 pp. 172–197. doi: 10.1080/15309576.2016.1071172.

  • 28. Luo Z. Qu H. Marnburg E. (2013). Justice Perceptions and Drives of Hotel Employee Social Loafing Behavior // International Journal of Hospitality Management. Vol. 33 pp. 456–464. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhm.2012.11.005.

  • 29. Meyer B. Schermuly C. C. Kauffeld S. (2015). That’s Not My Place: The Interacting Effects of Faultlines Subgroup Size and Social Competence on Social Loafing Behaviour in Work Groups // European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology. Vol. 25 No. 1 pp. 31–49. doi:10.1080/1359432X.2014.996554.

  • 30. Merkevičius J. Uturytė-Vrubliauskienė L. (2008). Virtual and Traditional Organizations - Singularity of Personnel Motivation // Socialiniai tyrimai-Social Research. Vol. 3 No. 13 pp. 119–126.

  • 31. Meslec N. Curşeu P. L. (2013). Too Close or Too Far Hurts: Cognitive Distance and Group Cognitive Synergy // Small Group Research. Vol. 44 No. 5 pp. 471–497. doi: 10.1177/1046496413491988.

  • 32. Mikuličiūtė V. (2012). The Interaction Between Cohesion Team Trust Perceived Self and Collective Efficacy Stress and Performance Efficacy in Military Teams // Psichologija. Psychology. No. 46 pp. 105–122. [Komandos sutelktumo pasitikėjimo ja suvokto Aš ir kolektyvinio efektyvumo patiriamo streso ir veiklos efektyvumo sąveika karinėse komandose in Lithuanian].

  • 33. Miura A. Hida M. (2004). Synergy Between Diversity and Similarity in Group-Idea Generation // Small Group Research. Vol. 35 No. 5 pp. 540–564. doi: 10.1177/1046496404264942.

  • 34. Murphy S. M. Wayne S. J. Liden R. C. Erdogan B. (2003). Understanding Social Loafing: The Role of Justice Perceptions and Exchange Relationships // Human Relations Vol. 56 No. 1 pp. 61–84. doi: 10.1177/0018726703056001450.

  • 35. Omar A. A. Lionel P. R. Likoebe M. M. (2010). Team Size Dispersion and Social Loafing in Technology-Supported Teams: A Perspective on the Theory of Moral Disengagement // Journal of Management Information Systems. Vol. 27 No. 1 pp. 203–230. doi: 10.2753/MIS0742-1222270109.

  • 36. Perry S. J. Lorinkova N. M. Hunter E. M. Hubbard A. McMahon J. T. (2016). When does Virtuality Really “Work”? Examining the Role of Work–Family and Virtuality in Social Loafing // Journal of Management. Vol. 42 No. 2 pp. 449–479. doi: 10.1177/0149206313475814.

  • 37. Rubino Ch. Avery D. R. Volpone S. D. Ford L. (2014). Does Teaming Obscure Low Performance? Exploring the Temporal Effects of Team Performance Diversity // Human Performance. Vol. 27 No. 5 pp. 416–434. doi: 10.1080/08959285.2014.956175.

  • 38. Schnake M. E. (1991). Equity in Effort: The Sucker Effect in Co-Acting Groups // Journal of Management. Vol. 17 No. 1 pp. 41–55. doi: 10.1177/014920639101700104.

  • 39. Seitchik A. E. Markins S. G. (2014). The effects of nonconscious and conscious goals on performance // Basic and Applied Social Psychology. Vol. 36 No. 2 pp. 90–110. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01973533.2013.856785.

  • 40. Seltzer J. (2016). Teaching about social loafing: the accounting team exercise // Management Teaching Review. Vol. 1 No. 1 pp. 34–42. doi: 10.1177/2379298115621889.

  • 41. Shih C.-H. Shao C.-C. Wang Y.-H. (2017). Study of Social Loafing and Employee Creativity. In: Barolli L. Enokido T. (eds) Innovative Mobile and Internet Services in Ubiquitous Computing. IMIS 2017. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing Vol. 612. Springer Cham. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-61542-4_84.

  • 42. Stark E. M. Shaw J. D. Duffy M. K. (2007). Preference for Group Work Winning Orientation and Social Loafing Behavior in Groups // Group & Organization Management. Vol. 32 No. 6 pp. 699–723. doi: 10.1177/1059601106291130.

  • 43. Strohmeier S. (2012). Assembling a Big Mosaic – A Review of Recent Books on Electronic Human Resource Management (e-HRM) // German Journal of Human Resource Management. Vol. 26 No. 3 pp. 282–294. doi: 10.1177/239700221202600305.

  • 44. Suleiman J. Watson R. T. (2008). Social Loafing in Technology-Supported Teams // Computer Supported Cooperative Work. Vol. 17 No. 4 pp. 291–309. doi: 10.1007/s10606-008-9075-6.

  • 45. Szymanski K. Harkins S. G. (1987). Social Loafing and Self-Evaluation with a Social Standard // Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. Vol. 53 No. 5 pp. 891–897. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.53.5.891.

  • 46. Tata J. (2002). The Influence of Accounts on Perceived Social Loafing in Work Teams // International Journal of Conflict Management. Vol. 13 No. 3 pp. 292–308. doi: 10.1108/eb022878.

  • 47. Van Dick R. Tissington T. A. Hertel G. (2009). Do Many Hands Make Light Work? How to Overcome Social Loafing and Gain Motivation in Work Teams // European Business Review. Vol. 21 No. 3 pp. 233–245. doi 10.1108/09555340910956621.

  • 48. Vveinhardt J. Banikonytė J. (2017a). Development Perspectives of the Social Group Cohesion in Reducing Social Loafing // Organizacijų vadyba: sisteminiai tyrimai. Management of Organizations: Systematic Research. Vol. 77 No. 1 pp. 185–202. http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/mosr-2017-0011 [Socialinės grupės darnos vystymo perspektyvos mažinant socialinį dykinėjimą in Lithuanian].

  • 49. Vveinhardt J. Banikonytė J. (2017b). Managerial Solutions to Reduce Social Loafing in Group Activities of Companies // Professional Studies: Theory and Practice Vol. 3 No. 18 pp. 77–85.

  • 50. Vveinhardt J. Banikonytė J. Ahmed R. R. (2017). Social Loafing in Group Activities of Manufacturing Companies // 30th IBIMA Conference 8-9 November 2017 (Madrid Spain) (in Press).

  • 51. Woodman T. Roberts R. Hardy L. Callow N. Rogers C. H. (2011). There is an “I” in Team: Narcissism and Social Loafing // Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport. Vol. 82 No. 2 pp. 285–290. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02701367.2011.10599756.

  • 52. Zabielavičienė I. (2009). Komandinio darbo specifika inovacijų sferoje // Current Issues of Business & Law. Vol. 3 pp. 87–103 [Specific Features of Teamwork in an Innovation Field in Lithuanian].

  • 53. Zhang Y. Huai M.-Y. (2015). Diverse Work Groups and Employee Performance: The Role of Communication Ties // Small Group Research. Vol. 47 No. 1 pp. 28–57. doi: 10.1177/1046496415604742.

  • 54. Zoghbi-Manrique-de-Lara P. Olivares-Mesa A. (2010). Bringing Cyber Loafers Back on the Right Track // Industrial Management & Data Systems. Vol. 110 No. 7 pp. 1038–1053. doi: 10.1108/02635571011069095.

Search