Development of a Method for Tool Wear Analysis Using 3D Scanning

Open access

Abstract

The paper deals with evaluation of a 3D scanning method elaborated by the authors, by applying it to the analysis of the wear of forging tools. The 3D scanning method in the first place consists in the application of scanning to the analysis of changes in geometry of a forging tool by way of comparing the images of a worn tool with a CAD model or an image of a new tool. The method was evaluated in the context of the important measurement problems resulting from the extreme conditions present during the industrial hot forging processes. The method was used to evaluate wear of tools with an increasing wear degree, which made it possible to determine the wear characteristics in a function of the number of produced forgings. The following stage was the use it for a direct control of the quality and geometry changes of forging tools (without their disassembly) by way of a direct measurement of the geometry of periodically collected forgings (indirect method based on forgings). The final part of the study points to the advantages and disadvantages of the elaborated method as well as the potential directions of its further development.

[1] Bewoor, N.A., Kulkarni, V. (2009). Metrology & Measurement Paperback. New Dehli: Tata McGraw-Hill Education Private Limited.

[2] Bills, P.J., Racasan, R., et al. (2012). Volumetric wear assessment of retrieved metal-on-metal hip prostheses and the impact of measurement uncertainty. Wear, 274-275, 212−219.

[3] Carmignato, S., Spinelli, M., Affatato, S., Savio, E. (2011). Uncertainty evaluation of volumetric wear assessment from coordinate measurements of ceramic hip joint prostheses. Wear, 270 (9−10), 584−590.

[4] Cuesta, E., et al. (2015). A statistical approach to prediction of the cmm drift behaviour using a calibrated mechanical artefact. Metrol. Meas. Syst., 12(3), 417-428.

[5] Dworzak, Ł., Hawryluk, M., Kaszuba, M., Ziemba J. (2016). Analysis of the approximation of data obtained from scanning of a forging instrument measuring arm under production conditions. IV International Scientific Technical Conference MANUFACTURING 2014 8−10 Dec. 2014 selected conference proc./Poznan University of Technology, Poznań, Poland, 23−34.

[6] Gronostajski, Z. et al. (2011). Application of the scanning laser system for the wear estimation of forging tools. Computer Methods in Materials Science, 11(2), 425−431.

[7] Gronostajski, Z., et al. (2015). Improving durability of hot forging tools by applying hybrid layers. Metallurgy, 54(4), 687−690.

[8] Gronostajski, Z., Kaszuba, M., Hawryluk, M., Zwierzchowski, M. (2014). A review of the degradation mechanisms of the hot forging tools. Archives of Civil and Mechanical Engineering, 14(4), 528−539.

[9] Gronostajski, Z., Hawryluk, M., Jakubik, J., Kaszuba, M., Misun, G., Sadowski, P. (2015). Solution examples of selected issues related to die forging. Archives of Metallurgy and Materials, 60(4), 2767−2775.

[10] Gronostajski, Z., Hawryluk, M., et al. (2016). The expert system supporting the assessment of the durability of forging tools. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 82, 1973-1991.

[11] Gronostajski, Z., Hawryluk, M., Kaszuba, M., Ziemba, J. (2016). Application of a measuring arm with an integrated laser scanner in the analysis of the shape changes of forging instrumentation during production. Eksploatacja i Niezawodnosc - Maintenance and Reliability, 18(2), 194-200.

[12] Gutierrez, R., Ramirez, M., Olmeda, E., Diaz, V. (2015). An uncertainty model of approximating the analytical solution to the real case in the field of stress prediction. Metrol. Meas. Syst., 22(3), 429−442.

[13] Hawryluk, M., Zwierzchowski, M., Marciniak, M., Sadowski, P. (2017). Phenomena and degradation mechanisms in the surface layer of die inserts used in the hot forging processes. Engineering Failure Analysis, 79, 313-329.

[14] Hawryluk, M., Jakubik, J. (2016). Analysis of forging defects for selected industrial die forging processes. Engineering Failure Analysis, 59, 396-409.

[15] ISO GPS 10360-4:2000 Geometrical Product Specifications (GPS) - Acceptance and Reverification Tests for Coordinate Measuring Machines (CMM) - Part 4: CMMs used in Scanning Measuring Mode. Norm.

[16] Kuş, A. (2009). Implementation of 3d optical scanning technology for automotive applications. Sensors, 9, 1967−1979.

[17] Langton, D.J., et al. (2014). Practical considerations for volumetric wear analysis of explanted hip arthroplasties. Bone & Joint Research, 3, 60-68.

[18] Li, F.X., Longstaff, A., Fletcher, S., Myers, S. (Mar 2012). Integrated tactile and optical measuring systems in three dimensional metrology. Computing and Engineering Researchers’ Conference, University of Huddersfield, 1−6.

[19] Lord, J.K., Langton, D.J., Nargol, A.V.F., Joyce, T.J. (2011). Volumetric wear assessment of failed metal-on-metal hip resurfacing prostheses. Wear, 272(1), 79−87.

[20] Lu, Z., McKellop, H.A. (2014). Accuracy of methods for calculating volumetric wear from coordinate measuring machine data of retrieved metal-on-metal hip joint implants. Proc. of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, part H, 228(3), 237−49.

[21] Machacek, P., Tomicek, J. (2010). Application of laser scanning in reverse engineering and prototype manufacturing. WTP, 1(21), 35−44.

[22] Majchrowski, R., Grzelka, M., Wieczorowski, M., Sadowski, Ł., Gapiński, B. (2015). Large area concrete surface topography measurements using optical 3d scanner. Metrol. Meas. Syst., 22(5), 565-576.

[23] Mathia, T., Pawlus, P., Wieczorowski, M. (2011). Recent trends in surface metrology. Wear, 271(3-4), 494-508.

[24] Measurement of a forging die for tooling corrections. APPLICATION REPORT: AICON_3D_SYSTEM. http://www.aicon3d.com/fileadmin/user_upload/produkte/en/breuckmann_Scanner/01_PDF_IuT/Forging_die_measurement_Web.pdf. (June 2017).

[25] Peng, X., Wang, L., et al. (2014). Optimized adaptive control for evaluation of artificial hip joint volumetric wear by coordinate measuring. Hsi-An Chiao Tung Ta Hsueh/Journal of Xi'an Jiaotong University, 48(8), 128−135.

[26] Raghavendra, N.V., Krishnamurthy, L. (2013). Engineering Metrology and Measurements Paperback. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

[27] Ratajczyk, E., Woźniak, A. (2016). Coordinate measuring systems. Warszaw: Oficyna Wydawnicza Politechniki Warszawskiej.

[28] Salah Hame, R.A. (2008). Influence of fitting algorithm and scanning speed on roundness error for 50 mm standard ring measurement using CMM. Metrol. Meas. Syst., 15(1), 33−53.

[29] Sładek, J., Sokal, G., Kmita, A., Ostrowska, K. (2007). Calibration of coordinate measuring arms. Acta Mechanica et Automatica, 1(2), 53−58.

[30] Weckenmann, A., Weickmann, J. (2006). Optical inspection of formed sheet metal parts applying fringe projection systems and virtual fixation. Metrol. Meas. Syst., 13(4), 321−334.

[31] Wieczorowski, M., Ruciński, M., Koteras, R. (2010). Application of optical scanning for measurements of castings and cores. Archives of Foundry Engineering, 10, 265−268.

[32] Yu-cun, Z.G., Jun-xia, H., Xian-bin, F., Fu-li, Z. (2014). Measurement and control technology of the size for large hot forgings. Measurement, 49, 52−59.

[33] Yu-cun, Z., Bin, W., Xian-bin, F. (2014). An unsteady temperature field measurement method for large hot cylindrical shell forging based on infrared spectrum. Measurement, 58, 12−20.

[34] Zhengchun, D., Zhaoyong, W., Jianguo, Y. (2016). 3D measuring and segmentation method for hot heavy forging. Measurement, 85, 43−53.

[35] Zhenyuan, J., Bangguo, W., Wei, L., Yuwen, S. (2010). An improved image acquiring method for machine vision measurement of hot formed parts. Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 210, 267-271.

Metrology and Measurement Systems

The Journal of Committee on Metrology and Scientific Instrumentation of Polish Academy of Sciences

Journal Information


IMPACT FACTOR 2016: 1.598

CiteScore 2016: 1.58

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2016: 0.460
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2016: 1.228

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 69 69 21
PDF Downloads 26 26 11