Reactive Stroma in Prostatic Carcinoma and Correlation with Tumor Grade and Tumor Stage

Open access

Abstract

Introduction. Reactive stroma co-evolves with prostatic carcinoma. The aim of this study is to establish stromal changes in the prostatic cancer tissue and to quantify those changes.

Methods. Samples from 70 patients treated with radical prostatectomy due to prostatic cancer were used for this analysis. Stromal changes in prostatic cancer tissue were analyzed using histochemical stain Trichrome Masson and immunohistochemical stains Vimentin and Desmin and those changes were compared to the stromal composition in the surrounding benign prostatic hyperplasia. These changes were quantified as following: for the histochemical stain Trichrome Masson we measured the intensity of the stain and for the immunohistochemical stains Vimentin and Desmin we used the “stromal index” that combines the frequency and intensity of the signal. We correlated the received data between each parameters and with tumor grade and tumor stage using the Spearman rank correlation test.

Results. There was significant correlation between Trichrome Masson staining intensity and tumor grade (R=0,27 p=0,023) and tumor stage (R=0,24 p=0,049), between Vimentin expression and tumor grade (R=0,35 p=0,003) and tumor stage (R=0,28 p=0,019) and between Desmin expression and tumor grade (R=−0,25 p=0,035).

Conclusion. Analyses of the stromal composition and the expression of stromal markers in prostatic carcinoma and their quantification could serve as an additional tool in evaluation of tumor aggressiveness and tumor extension.

1. Grossfeld GD, Hayward SW, Tisty TD, Cunha GR. The role of stroma in prostatic carcinogenesis. Endocr Relat Cancer 1988; 5: 253-270.

2. Ronnov-Jessen L, Petersen OW, Bissell MJ. Cellular changes involved in conversion of normal to malignant breast: importance of the stromal reaction. Physiol Rev 1996; 76: 69-125.

3. Cunha GR, Hayward SW, Dahiya R, Foster BA. Smooth muscle-epithelial interactions in normal and neoplastic prostatic development. Acta Anat (Basel) 1996; 155: 63-72.

4. Hayward SW, Rosen MA, Cunha GR. Stromal-epithelial interactions in the normal and neoplastic prostate. Br J Urol 1997; 79(Suppl 2): 18-26.

5. Tuxhorn JA, Ayala GE, Smith MJ, et al. Reactive stroma in human prostate cancer: induction of myofibroblast phenotype and extracellular matrix remodeling. Clin Cancer Res 2002; 8(9): 2912-223.

6. Sappino AP, Schurch W, Gabbiani G. Differentiation repertoire of fibroblastic cells: expression of cytoskeletal proteins as marker of phenotypic modulatons. Lab Investig 1990; 63: 144-161.

7. Tomas D, Spajic B, Milosevic M, et al. Intensity of stromal changes predicts biochemical recurrence-free survival in prostatic carcinoma. Scand J Urol Nephrol 2010; 44(5): 284-290.

8. Tomas D, Kruslin B. The potential value of (Myo)fibroblastic stromal reaction in the diagnosis of prostatic adenocarcinoma. Prostate 2004; 61(4): 324-331.

9. Hahn WC, Weinberg RA. Rules for making human tumor cells. N Engl J Med 2002; 347: 1593-604.

10. Soto AM, Sonnenschein C. The somatic mutation theory of cancer: Growing problems with the paradigm? Bioessays 2004; 26: 1097-1107.

11. Van Regenmortel MH. Biological complexity emerges from the ashes of genetic reductionism. J Mol Recognit 2004; 17: 145-148.

12. Fukino K, Shen L, Matsumoto S, et al. Combined total genome loss of heterozygosity scan of breast cancer stroma and epithelium reveals multiplicity of stromal targets. Cancer Res 2004; 64: 7231-7236.

13. Olumi AF, Grossfeld GD, Hayward SW, et al. Carcinoma-associated fibroblasts direct tumor progression of initiated human prostatic epithelium. Cancer Res 1999; 59: 5002-5011.

14. Barcellos-Hoff MH, Ravani SA. Irradiated mammary gland stroma promotes the expression of tumorigenic potential by unirradiated epithelial cells. Cancer Res 2000; 60: 1254-1260.

15. Maffini MV, Soto AM, Calabro JM, et al. The stroma as a crucial target in rat mammary gland carcinogenesis. J Cell Sci 2004; 117: 1495-1502.

16. Weinstein IB. Cancer. Addiction to oncogenes-the Achilles heal of cancer. Science 2002; 297: 63-64.

17. Sonnenschein C, Soto AM. Somatic mutation theory of carcinogenesis: why it should be dropped and replaced. Mol Carcinog 2000; 29: 205-211.

18. Bissell MJ, Radisky D. Putting tumours in context. Nat Rev Cancer 2001; 1: 46-54.

19. Maffini MV, Geck P, Powell CE, et al. Mechanism of androgen action on cell proliferation: AS3 protein as a mediator of proliferative arrest in the rat prostate. Endocrinology 2002; 143: 2708-2714.

20. Sonnenschein C, Soto AM. Are times a’ changin’ in carcinogenesis? Endocrinology 2005; 146(1): 11-12.

21. Ayala G, Tuxhorn JA, Wheeler TM, et al. Reactive stroma as a predictor of biochemical-free recurrence in prostate cancer. Clin Cancer Res 2003; 9: 4792-4801.

22. Yanagisawa N, Li R, Rowley D, et al. Stromogenic prostatic carcinoma pattern (carcinomas with reactive stromal grade 3) in needle biopsies predicts biochemical recurrence-free survival in patients after radical prostatectomy. Hum Pathol 2007; 38: 1611-1620.

Journal Information

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 171 97 10
PDF Downloads 71 52 6