Mapping the interactions between the stakeholders of the circular economy ecosystem applied to the textile and apparel sector in Romania

Open access


The goal of this research is to acknowledge the elements which hinder or facilitate the transition from linear to the circular economy in the textile and apparel sector in Romania by identifying current and desired interactions among the ecosystem’s stakeholders. Two strands of literature, one on circular economy and one on the textile and apparel sector, provide the theoretical background for this research. Currently, the way we design, produce, and use clothing has drawbacks that are becoming increasingly clear. The circular economy principles have the potential to transform the way textiles are produced, consumed and disposed of. More and more social entrepreneurs are pioneering the future of the apparel industry by offering sustainable solutions to tackling systemic problems. However, their efforts have to be elevated and amplified, as such to pave the way for creating business models that allow for both economic performance and social impact. A comprehensive mapping of ongoing activities and stakeholders in the textile and apparel sector in Romania is required to understand the roadblocks to industry transformation in the context of moving toward circular economy and to implement envisioned sustainable solutions. In the paper we used a database of 27 stakeholders, developed by applying the snowball method, to investigate current and future interactions between the main actors who operate in the textile and apparel sector. To meet its research objectives, the paper employed a phenomenological research design and built upon a workshop activity. First, we designed an online survey to understand the profile and knowledge of the circular economy of the stakeholders included in our database. Second, we employed the world café method to understand in depth the level of knowledge of the actors who attended the workshop on the circular economy in the textile and apparel sector. Third, we used the structural systemic constellations method in assessing the stakeholders’ current and future desired interactions. Last, we formulated conclusions and recommendations about future research needed to deepen the understanding of the circular economy in the textile and apparel sector. Findings showed that there is a vicious circle of different actions feeding isolation and preventing collaboration among stakeholders. Also, we found that there is a lack of collaborative spaces where stakeholders can meet, connect and explore the various opportunities to collaborate, and a lack of general awareness on “circular economy and textile and apparel” and its mechanisms. The intended audiences of the research are decision-makers and practitioners in the textile and apparel sector, as well as researchers focused on the circular economy.

Askoka and C.A. Foundation (2016), “Fabric of change. Social entrepreneurs’ transforming the apparel industry”, available at: (accessed on November 17, 2018).

Baltar, F. and Brunet, I. (2012), “Social research 2.0: virtual snowball sampling method using Facebook”, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, 1066-2243, Vol. 22, No. 1, pp. 57-74, DOI:10.1108/10662241211199960.

Breniuc, I. (2017), “Romanian Upcyclers Map”, available at: (accessed March 5, 2018).

Brouwer, J.H., Woodhill, A.J., Hemmati, M., Verhoosel, K.S., Vugt, S.M. (2015), “The MSP guide - how to design and facilitate multi-stakeholder partnerships”, Practical Action Publishing, Warwickshire.

Checkland P., Scholes J. (1999), “Soft systems methodology in action”, Chichester: John Wiley and Sons Ltd.

Churchman, C. W. (1967), “Wicked Problems”, Management Science, Vol. 14, No. 4, pp. 141-142.

CSR Europe and Universita Malta. (2018), “Enablers and Barriers to a Circular Economy”, available at: (accessed October 23, 2018).

Ellen MacArthur Foundation. (2017), “A new textiles economy: Redesigning fashion’s future”, available at: (accessed on October 1st, 2018).

European Commission. (2008), “Directive 2008/98/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 19 November 2008 on waste and repealing certain Directives”, available at: (accessed on November 20, 2018).

European Commission. (2015), “Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, The Council, The European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions on Closing the loop”, available at: (accessed November 1st, 2018).

European Commission. (2017a), “Report from the Commission to the European Parliament, The Council, The European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions on the implementation of the Circular Economy Action Plan”, available at: (accessed October 15, 2018).

European Commission. (2017b), “European Circular Economy Stakeholder Platform”, available at: (accessed November 15, 2018).

European Commission. (2018), “Circular Economy: New rules will make EU the global front-runner in waste management and recycling”, available at: (accessed November 2, 2018).

European Environment Agency. (2018), “Waste prevention in Europe - policies, status and trends in reuse in 2017”, available at: (accessed November 5, 2018).

European Union. (2016), “Social enterprises and the social economy going forward”, available at: (accessed November 15, 2018).

Fischer, A. and Pascucci, S. (2017), “Institutional incentives in circular economy transition: The case of material use in the Dutch textile industry”, Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 155, pp. 17-32.

Fontell, P. and Heikkilä P. (2017), “Model of circular business ecosystem for textiles”, available at: (accessed November 1, 2018).

Forbes. (2018), “Social Entrepreneurs Are Opening New Pathways To Transform The Apparel Industry”, available at: (accessed November 29, 2018)

Gardetti, M.A. and Muthu, S.S. (2015), “Sustainable apparel? Is the innovation in the business model? - The case of the IOU Project”, Textile and clothing sustainability Journal, Vol. 1, DOI: 10.1186/s40689-015-0003-0.

Gharajedaghi J. (2011), “Systems Thinking: Managing Chaos and Complexity”, Third Edition, Burlington: Elsevier.

Ghisellini, P., Cialani, C., Ulgiati, S. (2016), “A review on circular economy: the expected transition to a balanced interplay of environmental and economic systems”, Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 114, pp.11-32.

Green Strategy. (2017), “Circular frameworks for sustainable business”, available at: (accesssed on October 3rd, 2018).

Livotova, O. and Livotov, P. (2015), “The Principle of Feeling - the method of structural systemic constellations for technical problem solving and decision making”, Procedia Engineering, Vol. 131, pp. 204-213.

Martin, M. (2013), “Making Impact Investible”, Impact Economy Working Papers, Vol. 4, SSRN: or

Ministerul Mediului. (2018), “Hotărâre privind aprobarea planului național de gestionare a deșeurilor”, Monitorul Oficial al României, part 1, Vol. 186, No. 11bis, pp. 1-410, available at: (accessed on December 2, 2018).

Pacheco, D.F., York, J.G., Dean, T.J., Sarasvathy, S.D. (2010), “The coevolution of institutional entrepreneurship: a tale of two theories”, J. Manag., Vol. 36, No. 4, pp. 974-1010.

Păunescu, C., Găucă, O., Drăgan, D. (2017), “Examining obligations to society for QS Stars best ranked universities in social responsibility”, Management & Marketing. Challenges for the Knowledge Society, Vol. 12, No. 4, pp. 551-570,

Păunescu, C., Pascu, A.I., Pop, O. (2016), “Social Enterprise: How does this Way of doing Business differ from other Forms of Enterprise”, Quality. Access to Success Scientific Journal of Management Systems, Vol. 17, No. 153, pp. 108-110, ISSN 1582-2559.

Păunescu C., Popescu, M.C., Blid, L. (2018), “Business impact analysis for business continuity: Evidence from Romanian enterprises on critical functions”, Management & Marketing. Challenges for the Knowledge Society, Vol. 13, No. 3, pp. 1035-1050,

Rahman, M. and Amin T. (2017), “Holistic approach towards sustainable fashion industry”, available at: (accessed November 15, 2018).

Rahman, S.-u. (2002), “The theory of constraints’ thinking process approach to developing strategies in supply chains”, International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, Vol. 32, No. 10, pp. 809-828.

Scharmer, C. O. (2016), “Theory U (second edition)”, Oakland: Berrett-Koehler Publishers Inc..

Scharmer, O. (2018), “The Presencing Institute”, available at:, (accessed 9th September 2018).

Senge, P. M. (2006), “The fifth discipline - the art & practice of the learning organization”, United States of America: Doubleday.

Smith, P., Baille, J., McHattie, L. (2017), “Sustainable Design Futures: An open design vision the circular economy in fashion and textiles”, in: The Design Journal, 20:sup1, S1938-S1947, doi: 10.1080/14606925.2017.1352712.

Staicu, D. (2018), “Financial sustainability of social enterprise in Central and Eastern Europe”, Proceedings of the International Conference on Business Excellence, Vol. 12, No. 1, pp. 907-917,

Stratan, D. (2017), “Success factors of sustainable social enterprises through circular economy perspective”, Visegrad Journal on Bioeconomy and Sustainable Development, Vol. 1, pp. 17-23, DOI: 10.1515/vjbsd-2017-0003.

The European Apparel and Textile Confederation. (2017), “Policy brief. Prospering in the circular economy”, available at: (accessed November 10, 2018).

Whicher A., Harris C., Beverley K., Swiatek P. (2017), “Design for circular economy: Developing an action plan for Scotland”, Journal of Cleaner Production, pp. 1-12.

Whittington, J. (2016), “Systemic Coaching & Constellations”, London: Kogan Page Limited.

World Economic Forum. (2010), “Redesigning business value. A roadmap to sustainable consumption”, available at: (accessed on October 15th, 2018).

World Economic Forum, Ellen MacArthur Foundation, McKinsey & Company. (2014), “Towards the Circular Economy: Accelerating the scale-up across global supply chains”, available at: (accessed September 4, 2018).

World Economic Forum’s Global Agenda Council on Complex Systems. (2013), “Perspectives on a Hyperconnected World - Insights from the Science of Complexity”, available at: (accessed October 20, 2018).

Journal Information

CiteScore 2017: 0.45

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2017: 0.169
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2017: 0.436


All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 91 91 24
PDF Downloads 107 107 28