Open access


The effect of coke and bituminous coal on the reduction of medium-grade manganese ore in ferromanganese production was investigated. Charges of 30 kg medium grade manganese ore, 12 kg limestone and varied amounts of coke and coal were smelted in a Submerged Electric Arc Furnace (SAF) at temperatures of 1300°C to 1500°C. The composition of the ferromanganese and the slag were determined by X-Ray Fluorescence. It was found that using coke as a single reductant resulted in a 96% yield of ferromanganese which was higher than by using coal either as a single reductant or in a mixture of coal and coke. It was also found that using coke as a single reductant resulted in the lowest specific energy consumption. Using coal as reductant produced ferromanganese containing high sulfur and phosphorus.

5. References

  • Ahmed, A., Haifa, H., El-Fawakhry, M. K., El-Faramawy, H & Eissa M. (2014). Parameters affecting energy consumption for producing high carbon ferromanganese in a closed submerged arc furnace. Journal of Iron and Steel Research, International, 21(7), 1-20. DOI:10.1016/S1006-706X(14)60103-5

  • Çardakli, I. S., SevInç, N., & Öztürk, T. (2011). Production of high carbon ferromanganese from a manganese ore located in Erzincan. Turkish Journal of Engineering and Environmental Sciences, 35(1), 31-38. DOI:10.3906/muh-1009-6.

  • Chaudhary, P. N., Minj, R. K., & Goel, R. P. (2007). Development of a process for dephosphorisation of high carbon ferromanganese. Proceedings-International Ferro-Alloys Congress (INFACON) XI, 18-21 February 2007 (pp. 288-296). New Delhi - India. The Indian Ferro Alloy Producers’ Association (IFAPA).

  • Chukwuleke, O. P., Cai, J., Chukwujekwu, S., & Xiao, S. (2009). Shift from coke to coal using direct reduction method and challenges. Journal of Iron and Steel Research, International, 16(2), 1-5. DOI: 10.1016/S1006-706X(09)60018-2.

  • Eissa, M., El-faramawy, H., Ahmed, A., & Nabil, S. (2012). Parameters affecting the production of high carbon ferromanganese in closed submerged arc furnace. Journal of Minerals & Materials Characterization & Engineering, 11(1), 1-20. DOI:10.4236/jmmce.2012.111001.

  • Hurd, D., & Kollar, J. (1991). Direct current electric arc furnaces. Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania: The EPRI Center for Materials Production (CMP-063).

  • Hwang, S. H. (2011). Phosphorus Removal From Manganese Ore by Plasma Treatment. Thesis, 2011, The University of Utah, United State of America.

  • Kunze, J., & Degel, R. (2004). New trends in submerged arc furnace technology. Proceedings - International Ferro-Alloys Congress (INFACON) X. 1–4 February 2004 (pp. 444-454). Capetown-South Africa. Document Transformation Technologies (Doctech).

  • Lagendijk, H., Xakalashe, B., Ligege, T., Ntikang, P., & Bisaka, K. (2010). Comparing manganese ferroalloy smelting in pilot-scale AC and DC submerged-arc furnaces. Proceedings - International Ferro-Alloys Congress (INFACON) XII, 6–9 June 2010 (pp. 498-508). Helshinki - Finland. Outotec Oyj.

  • Shim, S. C., & Sano, N. (1995). Thermodynamics of phosphorus in carbon-saturated manganese-based alloys. Proceedings - International Ferro-Alloys Congress (INFACON) VII, 11–14 June 1995 (611–620). Trondheim- Norway. The Norwegian Ferroalloy Research Organization (FFF).

  • Steenkamp, J. D., & Basson, J. (2013). The manganese ferroalloys industry in southern Africa. The Journal of The Southern Africa Institute of Mining and Metallurgy, 113(8), 667-676. Available from:>. ISSN 2411-9717.

  • Tangstad, M., & Olsen, S. E. (1995). The ferromanganese process-material and energy balance. Proceedings - International Ferro-Alloys Congress (INFACON) VII, 1–14 June 1995 (pp. 621-630). Trondheim-Norway. The Norwegian Ferroalloy Research Organization (FFF).

  • Vorob’ev, V. P., Godunov, A. D., & Ignat’ev, A. V. (2009). Production of manganese alloys from rich highbasicity ore. Steel in Translation, 39(3), 243-247. DOI: 10.3103/S0967091209030152.


The Journal of Mineralogical Society of Poland

Journal Information

CiteScore 2016: 0.36

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2016: 0.127
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2016: 0.197


All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 18 18 18
PDF Downloads 3 3 3