Assessing a Moderating Effect and the Global Fit of a PLS Model on Online Trading

Open access


This paper proposes a PLS Model for the study of Online Trading. Traditional investing has experienced a revolution due to the rise of e-trading services that enable investors to use Internet conduct secure trading. On the hand, model results show that there is a positive, direct and statistically significant relationship between personal outcome expectations, perceived relative advantage, shared vision and economy-based trust with the quality of knowledge. On the other hand, trading frequency and portfolio performance has also this relationship. After including the investor’s income and financial wealth (IFW) as moderating effect, the PLS model was enhanced, and we found that the interaction term is negative and statistically significant, so, higher IFW levels entail a weaker relationship between trading frequency and portfolio performance and vice-versa. Finally, with regard to the goodness of overall model fit measures, they showed that the model is fit for SRMR and dG measures, so it is likely that the model is true.

1. Alemanni, B. & Franzosi, A. (2006). Portfolio and psychology of high frequency online traders. Borsa Italiana BItNotes, 16, 12–31.

2. Andrews, D. (2002). Audience-specific online community design. Communications of the ACM, 45 (4), 64–68.

3. Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: Freeman.

4. Bock, G.W. & Kim, Y.G. (2002). Breaking the myths of rewards: an exploratory study of attitudes about knowledge sharing. Information Resources Management Journal, 15 (2), 14–21.

5. Butler, B., Sproull, L., Kiesler, S., & Kraut, R. (2002). Community effort in online groups: who does the work and why. In: Weisband, S. & Atwater, L. (Eds.), Leadership at a Distance. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Publishers.

6. Chen, C.J. & Hung., S.W. (2010). To give or to receive? Factors influencing members’ knowledge sharing and community promotion in professional virtual communities. Information & Management, 47 (4), 226–236.

7. Chin, W.W. (1998). The Partial Least Approach to Structural Equation Modelling. In Marcoulides, A. (Ed.). Modern Methods for Business Research. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum.

8. Chiu, C.M.; Hsu, M.H. y Wang, E.T.G. (2006). Understanding knowledge sharing in virtual communities: an integration of social capital and social cognitive theories. Decision Support Systems, 42 (3), 1872–1888.

9. Cohen, J.A. (1992). A Power Primer. Pychological Bulletin, 112 (1), 155–519.

10. Coleman, J.S. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology, 94, 95–120.

11. Compeau, D.R. & Higgins, C.A. (1995). Computer self-efficacy: development of a measure and initial test. MIS Quarterly, 19 (2), 189–211.

12. Davis, F.D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13 (3), 319–340.

13. Davis, F.D., Bagozzi, R.P., & Warshaw, P.R., (1989). User acceptance of computer technology: a comparison of two theoretical models. Management Science, 35 (8), 982–1002.

14. DeLone, W.H. y McLean, E.R. (2003). The Delone and Mclean model of information systems success: a ten-year update. Journal of Management Information Systems, 19 (4), 9–30.

15. Dijkstra, T.K. & Henseler, J. (2015). Consistent and Asymptotically normal PLS estimators for Linear Structural Equations. Computational Statistics and Data Analysis, 81, 10–23.

16. Dorn, D. & Huberman, G. (2005). Talk and actions: what individual investors say and what they do’. Mimeo.

17. Duarte, P.A.O. & Raposo, M.L.B. (2010). A PLS Model to Study Brand Preference: An Application to the Mobile Phone Market. In Esposito Vinzi, V., Chin, W.W., Henseler, J., & Wang, H. (Eds.). Handbook of Partial Least Squares. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.

18. Falk, R.F. & Miller, N.B. (1992). A Primer for Soft Modelling. Akron (OH): The University of Akron Press.

19. Franzosi, A. & Pellizzoni, E. (2004). Profili e comportamenti dei traders online. Primo rapporto sul mercato italiano. Borsa Italiana BItNotes 11, 10–30.

20. García-Machado, J.J., Roca Pulido, J.C., & de la Vega Jiménez, J.J. (2009). The Role of Trust and Risk in E-Trading. In Celant, A. & Iturralde Jainaga, T. (Eds.), Creativity and Survival of the Firm under Uncertainty. Rome: European Academic Publishers.

21. García-Machado, J.J., Roca Pulido, J.C. & de la Vega Jiménez, J.J. (2013). Characteristics of High Frequency Online Investors in Spain. In García-Machado, J.J. (Coord.), Discovering New Horizons in Management. Madrid: ESIC Editorial.

22. Gefen, D., Karahanna, E., and Straub, D.W. (2003). Trust and TAM in online shopping: an integrated model. MIS Quarterly, 27 (1), 51–90.

23. Geisser, S. (1975). The Predictive Sample Reuse Method with Applications. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 70 (350), 320–328.

24. Glaser, M. (2003). Online broker investors: demographic information, investment strategy, portfolio positions and trading activity. SFB 504 discussion paper 03–18, University of Mennheim, October.

25. Glaser, M. & Weber, M. (2005). Overconfidence and trading volume. Mimeo.

26. Hair, J.F., Hult, G.T., Ringle, C.M. and Sarstedt, M. (2017). A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM). 2nd Edition. Los Angeles: Sage Publications, Inc.

27. Hair, J.F., Sarstedt, M., Hopkins, L. & Kuppelwieser, V.G. (2014). Partial Least Square Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM), An emerging tool in business research. European Business Review, 26 (2), 106–121.

28. Hendriks, P. (1999). Why share knowledge? The influence of ICT on the motivation for knowledge sharing. Knowledge and Process Management, 6 (2), 91–100.

29. Henseler, J. (2017). Adanco 2.0.1. User Manual. Kleve: KG, Composite Modeling GmbH & Co.

30. Hsu, M.H, Ju T.L., Yen, C.H., & Chang, C.M. (2007). Knowledge sharing behaviour in virtual communities: The relationship between trust, self-efficacy, and outcome expectations. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 65 (2), 153–169.

31. Hu, L.T. & Bentler, P.M. (1999). Cut-off criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, (1), 1–55.

32. Kenny, D.A. (2016). Moderation. Retrieved from

33. Li, Li. (2005). The effects of trust and shared vision on inward knowledge transfer in subsidiaries’ intra- and inter-organizational relationships. International Business Review, 14 (1), 77–95.

34. Morgan, R.M., & Hunt, S.D. (1994). The commitment-trust theory of relationship marketing. Journal of Marketing, 58, 20–38.

35. Nahapiet, J. and Ghoshal, S. (1998). Social Capital, Intellectual Capital, and the Organization Advantage. Academy of Management Review, 23 (2), 242–266.

36. Nitzl, C. (2016). The use of partial least squares structural equation modelling (PLS-SEM) in management accounting research: Directions for future theory development. Journal of Accounting Literature, 37, 19–35.

37. Panteli, N. & Sockalingam, S. (2005). Trust and con? ict within virtual interorganizational alliances: a framework for facilitating knowledge sharing. Decision Support Systems, 39 (4), 599–617.

38. Parsons, A.L. (2002). What determines buyer-seller relationship quality? An investigation from the buyer’s perspective. The Journal of Supply Chain Management, 38 (2), 4–12.

39. Ratnasingam, P. (2005). Trust in inter-organizational exchanges: a case study in business to business electronic commerce. Decision Support Systems, 39 (3), 525–544.

40. Ringle, C.M. (2016). Advanced PLS-SEM Topics: PLS Multigroup Analysis. Working paper, University of Seville, November.

41. Ringle, C.M., Wende, S., & Becker, J.M. (2015). SmartPLS 3. Boenningstedt: SmartPLS GmbH:,

42. Roldán, J.L. & Sánchez-Franco, M.J. (2012). Variance-based Structural Equation Modeling: Guidelines for using Partial Least Square. In: Mora M., Gelman, O., Steenkamp, A., & Raisinghani, M.S. (2012). Research Methodologies, Innovations and Philosophies in Software System Engineering and Information Systems. USA: IGI Global.

43. Roca Pulido, J.C., García Machado, J.J., & de la Vega Jiménez, J.J. (2009). The importance of Perceived Trust, Security and Privacy in Online Trading Systems. Information Management & Computer Security, 17 (2), 96–113.

44. Roca Pulido, J.C., García Machado, J.J., & de la Vega Jiménez, J.J. (2010). Personal Innovativeness, Security, and Privacy as Determinants of E-Trading Adoption. International Journal of Electronic Finance, 4 (3), 269–286.

45. Roca Pulido, J.C., García Machado, J.J., & de la Vega Jiménez, J.J. (2013). Virtual Communities as support in financial investment decisions. In: García-Machado, J.J. (Coord.), Discovering New Horizons in Management. Madrid: ESIC Editorial.

46. Stone, M. (1974). Cross-validatory Choice and Assessment of Statistical Predictions. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B (Methodological), 36 (2), 111–147.

47. Stone, R.W. & Henry, J.W. (2003). The roles of computer self-efficacy and outcome expectancy in influencing the computer end-user’s organizational commitment. Journal of End User Computing, 15 (1), 38–53.

48. Tsai, W. & Ghoshal, S. (1998). Social capital and value creation: an empirical study of intrafirm networks. Academy of Management Journal, 41 (4), 464–476.

49. Zhang, Y. & Hiltz, S.R. (2003). Factors that influence online relationship development in a knowledge sharing community, Proceedings of the Ninth American Conference on Information Systems, 410–417.

Journal Information


All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 268 259 24
PDF Downloads 129 128 13