Local Tax Competition in Poland?

Open access


The concept of tax competition has been successfully applied in an analysis conducted in several European countries, but so far it has not been systematically tested either in Poland or in other countries of Central and Eastern Europe. There are two types of competition discussed in the article: classic competition for mobile tax base and ‘yardstick competition’, in which local politicians compete for political capital being related to the comparison of tax rates with neighbouring municipalities. It is expected that in Poland the ‘yardstick competition’ is more important from the classic competition for the mobile tax base.

Aalers, M & Elhorst, JP 2005, ‘Tax mimicking and yardstick competition among local governments in Netherlands’, International Tax and Public Finance, vol. 12(4), pp. 495–513.

Baur, M 2010, ‘Harmonising Tax Base: Pros and Cons’. Paper presented at the OECD Conference on Tax Competition Between Sub-Central Governments, Bern 31.05-01.06.2010.

Blöchliger, H 2013, Fiscal federalism 2014: making decentralization work, Paris: OECD.

Blöchliger, H & Pinero-Campos, J 2011, ‘Tax Competition Between Sub-Central Governments’, OECD Working Papers on Fiscal Federalism, no. 13, OECD Publishing.

Bodenstein, M & Ursprung, H 2005, ‘Political yardstick competition, economic integration, and constitutional choice in a federation: A numerical analysis of a contest success function model’, Public Choice, vol. 124(3/4), pp. 329–352.

Brülhart, M & Pratchet, R 2014, ‘Alleged tax competition: the mysterious death of bequest taxes in Switzerland’, Journal of Public Economics, vol. 111, pp. 63–78.

Buchanan, J & Musgrave RA 1999, Public finance and public choice: two contrasting visions of the state, The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA – London.

Buglione, E & Mare, M 2010, ‘Tax Competition and Fiscal Federalism in Italy’. Paper presented at the OECD Conference on Tax Competition Between Sub-Central Governments, Bern, 31.05-01.06.2010.

Dafflon, B & Rossi, S 2004, ‘Tax competition between subnational governments: theoretical and regional policy issues with reference to Switzerland’, in Finanzpolitik in der Kontroverse, eds E Hein, A Heise & A Truger, Verlag, Marburg: Metropolis, pp. 227–250.

Dowding, K & Feiock, R 2012, ‘Intralocal competition and cooperation’, in The Oxford Handbook of Urban Politics, eds K Mossberger, S Clarke & P John, Oxford University Press, pp. 29–50.

Elschner, C & Vanborren, V 2009, ‘Corporate effective tax rates in an enlarged European Union’, Taxation Papers, Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.

François, I 2010, ‘Sub-central tax competition: The French case’. Paper presented at the OECD Conference on Tax Competition Between Sub-Central Governments, Bern 31.05-01.06.2010.

Gérard, M, Jayet, H & Paty, S 2009, ‘Tax interactions among Belgian municipalities: Does language matter?, CESIFO Working Paper, no. 2558, February 2009.

Janeba, E & Osterloch, S 2012, ‘Tax and the city: a theory of local tax competition and evidence for Germany’, ZEW Discussion Paper, no. 12–005, Manheim.

Kalb, A, Geys, B & Heinemann, F 2012, ‘Value for money? German local government efficiency in a comparative perspective’, Applied Economics, vol. 44(2), pp. 201–218.

Kleven, H, Landais, C, Saez, E & Schultz, E 2013, ‘Migration and wage effects of taxing top earners: Evidence from the foreigners. Tax scheme in Denmark’, NBER Working Paper, no. 18885, March 2013.

Lyytikäinen, T 2012, ‘Tax competition among local governments: evidence from a property tax reform in Finland’, Journal of Public Economics, vol. 96, pp. 584–595.

Miszczuk, A & Miszczuk, M 1995, ‘Próba typologii podatkowej gmin (na przykładzie województwa lubelskiego)’, Wiadomości Statystyczne, vol. 5.

Moisio, A 2010, ‘Tax competition among municipalities: The case of Finland’. Paper presented at the OECD conference on Tax Competition Between Sub-Central Governments, Bern 31.05-01.06.2010.

Mouritzen, PE 1992, ‘What is a fiscal crisis?’ in Managing cities in austerity: urban fiscal stress in ten western countries, ed PE Mouritzen, Sage, London-Newbury Park-New Delhi.

Oates, W 1972, Fiscal Federalism, Harcourt, Brace and Jovanovic, New York.

Podstawka, M & Rudowicz, E 2010, ‘Wykorzystanie wybranych podatków lokalnych w kreowaniu polityki fiskalnej gmin’, Zeszyty Naukowe SGGW: Polityki Europejskie, Finanse i Marketing, vol. 4 (53), pp. 79–87.

Rattsø, J 2005, ‘Local tax Financing in the Nordic Countries’, Yearbook of Nordic Tax Research, pp. 33–50.

Reulier, E & Rocaboy, Y 2009, ‘Regional tax competition: evidence from French regions’, Regional Studies, vol. 43(7), pp. 915–922.

Sedmihradská, L & Bakoš, E 2016, ‘Municipal tax autonomy and tax mimicking in Czech municipalities’, Lex localis-Journal of Local Self-Government, vol. 14(1), pp. 75–92.

Šević, Ž 2008, Local public finance in Central and Eastern Europe, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham.

Skica T, Kiebała, A & Wołowiec, T 2011, ‘Stymulowanie lokalnej konkurencyjności gmin na przykładzie podatków od środków transportowych’, Studia Regionalne i Lokalne, vol. 2(44), pp. 118–139.

Swianiewicz, P 2014, ‘An empirical typology of local government systems in Eastern Europe’, Local Government Studies, vol. 40(2), pp. 292–311.

Swianiewicz, P 2015, ‘The politics of local tax policy making in Poland’. Paper presented at the NISPAcee Annual Conference, Tbilisi, May 21–24, 2015.

Swianiewicz, P & Łukomska, J 2015, ‘Local tax policies in the limited autonomy of the revenue collection system in Poland’, in Interaction between local expenditure responsibilities and local tax policy, eds K Junghun, J Lotz & NJ Mau, Danish Ministry for Economic Affairs and the Interior and The Korea Institute of Public Finance, Rosendahls, .

Tiebout, C 1956, ‘A pure theory of local expenditures’, Journal of Political Economy, vol. 64(5), pp. 416–424.

Miscellanea Geographica

Regional Studies on Development

Journal Information

CiteScore 2017: 0.73

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2017: 0.404
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2017: 0.759

Covered by e.g. Web of Science Core Collection by Clarivate Analytics, and SCOPUS by Elsevier
14 points in the Ministerial journal value rating scale


All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 120 120 17
PDF Downloads 60 60 10