Spatial patterns of the variability of native residentsin a transitional society: The case of the Czech Republic

Open access

Abstract

Currently, the native residents of a country are an important social phenomenon. Although extensive mobility challenges the bonds between places and their inhabitants, biographies of native residents are less often based in several spatial contexts because they are born and raised in a specific place and live there for their entire lives. This absence of residential mobility has important consequences for the ways native residents relate to their ‘home places’ and how they build local attachments. Using data from the Czech Republic, the main objective of this paper is to explore and analyse recent developments in the structure of native residents. The objects of analysis are the municipalities of the Czech Republic, and aggregate census data are used for the purpose of analysis. Spatial and non-spatial approaches to the analysis showed significant changes in the structure of native residents, revealing statistically significant spatial patterns. In general, the residents of Czech municipalities demonstrate levels of co-residence or ‘mixing’ in a significant way in recent years. Thus, further research into matters such as spatial belonging, attachment and identity should also take into account the influence of mobility.

ADEY, P. (2010): Mobility. London and New York, Routledge.

ANSELIN, L. (1995): Local Indicators of Spatial Association–LISA. Geographical Analysis, 27(2): 94–115.

ANTONSICH, M. (2010): Searching for Belonging – An Analytical Framework. Geography Compass, 4(6): 644–659.

BLAŽEK, J., CSANK, P. (2007): The West-East gradient and regional development: the case of the Czech Republic. Acta Universitatis Carolinae Geographica, 40(1–2): 89–108.

CASSIDY, A., MCGRATH, B. (2015): Farm, place and identity construction among Irish farm youth who migrate. Journal of Rural Studies, 37: 20–28.

CHROMÝ, P., JANŮ, H. (2003): Regional identity, activation of territorial communities and the potential of the development peripheral regions. Acta Universitatis Carolinae-Geographica, 38: 105–117.

CHROMÝ, P., KUČEROVÁ, S., KUČERA, Z. (2009): Regional identity, contemporary and historical regions and the issue of relict borders – the case of Czechia. Regions and Regionalism, 9(2): 9–19.

CRESSWELL, T. (2002): Introduction: theorizing place. In: Verstraet, G., Cresswell, T. [eds.]: Mobilizing Place, Placing Mobility (pp. 11–32). Amsterdam, Rodopi.

CRESSWELL, T. (2006): On the move: mobility in the modern Western world. London, New York, Routledge.

CZSO (2014): Obyvatelstvo České republiky podle místa narození. Prague, CZSO.

HAMPL, M., DOSTÁL, P., DRBOHLAV, D. (2007): Social and cultural geography in the Czech Republic: under pressures of globalization and post-totalitarian transformation. Social & Cultural Geography, 8(3): 475–493.

DOSTÁL, P., HAMPL, M. (2004): Geography of post-communist transformation and general cycle of regional development: experiences of the Czech Republic in a global context. European Spatial Research and Policy, 11(1): 7–29.

ELDEN, S. (2007): There is a politics of space because space is political. Radical Philosophy Review 10: 101–116.

FENG, D., BREITUNG, W. (2018): What makes you feel at home? Constructing senses of home in two border cities. Population, Space and Place, 24(3). DOI: 10.1002/psp.2116.

FENG, D., BREITUNG, W., ZHU, H. (2014): Creating and defending concepts of home in suburban Guangzhou. Eurasian Geography and Economics, 55(4): 381–403.

FRIED, M. (2000): Continuities and discontinuities of place. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 20: 193–205.

GERLACH, D. (2010): Beyond Expulsion. The Emergence of “Unwanted Elements” in the Postwar Czech Borderlands, 1945–1950. East European Politics and Societies, 24(2): 269–293.

GOLLEDGE, R. G., STIMSON, R. J. (1997): Spatial behavior: a geographic perspective. New York, The Guilford Press.

GUSTAFSON, P. (2001): Meanings of place: everyday experience and theoretical conceptualizations. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 21(1): 5–16.

GUSTAFSON, P. (2009): Mobility and territorial belonging. Environment and behavior, 41(4): 490–508.

GUSTAFSON, P. (2013): Place attachment in the age of mobility. In: Manzo, L. C., Devine-Wright, P. [eds.]: Place attachment: Advances in Theory, Methods and Applications. London, Routledge.

HAY, R. (1998a): A rooted sence of place in cross-cultural perspective. The Canadian Geographer, 42(3): 245–266.

HAY, R. (1998b). Sence of place in developmental context. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 18: 5–29.

KUČEROVÁ-KULDOVÁ, S. (2008). Contribution to the study of regional identity reproduction process – the case of the Czech resettled borderland. In: Szabó, P., Hédl, R. [eds.]: Human nature: studies in historical ecology and environmental history (pp. 86–97). Průhonice, Institute of Botany of the ASCR.

KUČEROVÁ, S. (2009): Rodáci a rodáctví. In: Heřmanová, E., Chromý, P. [eds.]: Kulturní regiony a geografie kultury (pp. 100–108). Prague, ASPI.

KULDOVÁ, S. (2005): Příspěvek ke kulturněgeografickému výzkumu: možnosti hodnocení kulturních aspektů pomocí statistických metod. Geografie – Sborník ČGS, 110(4): 44–58.

MCCOOL, S. F., Martin, S. R. (1994): Community Attachment and Attitudes Toward Tourism Development. Journal of Travel Research, 33: 29–34.

MORAN, P. A. P. (1950): Notes on continuous stochastic phenomena. Biometrika, 37: 17–23.

NETRDOVÁ, P., NOSEK, V. (2017): Exploring variability and geographical patterns of population characteristics: regional and spatial perspective. Moravian Geographical Reports, 25(2): 85–94.

PAASI, A. (1986): The institutionalization of regions: a theoretical framework for understanding the emergence of regions and the constitution of regional identity. Fennia, 164(1): 105–146.

PAASI, A. (2002): Bounded spaces in the mobile world: deconstructing “regional identity”. Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, 93(2): 137–148.

PAASI, A. (2003): Region and place: regional identity in question. Progress in Human Geography, 27(4): 475–485.

POLLINI, G. (2007): Elements of theory of place attachment and socio-territorial belonging. International Review of Sociology, 15(3): 497–515.

RILEY, R. B. (1992): Attachment to the ordinary landscape. In: Altman, I., Low, S. [eds.]: Place attachment (pp. 13–35). New York, Plenum Press.

RŮŽKOVÁ, J. et al. (1995): Sčítání lidu, domů a bytů 1991: pramenné dílo. Prague, CZSO.

ŠANDA, R. (2015): Obvyklý a trvalý pobyt ve sčítání lidu 2011. Demografie, 57(2): 113–126.

SEMIAN, M., CHROMÝ, P. (2014): Regional identity as driver or barrier in regional development. Norsk Geografisk Tidsskrift, 68(5): 263–270.

SHELLER, M., URRY, J. (2006): The new mobilities paradigm. Environment and Planning A, 38: 207–226.

ŠIFTA, M., CHROMÝ, P. (2017): The importance of symbols in the region formation proces. Norsk Geografisk Tidsskrift, 71(2): 98–113.

ŠKRABAL, J. et al. (2005): Sčítání lidu, domů a bytů 2001: pramenné dílo. Prague, CZSO.

ŠKRABAL, J. et al. (2013): Sčítání lidu, domů a bytů 2011: pramenné dílo. Prague, CZSO.

SLOVÁKOVÁ, P., ŠERÝ, M. (2016): Narrative interviews in research on post-war socio-historical processes as formative factors of the regional identity of the population. Case study of the Svitavy region (Czech Republic). Hungarian Geographical Bulletin, 65(1): 27–42.

THEODORY, G. L. (2004): Exploring the Association between Length of Residence and Community Attachment: A Research Note. Southern Rural Sociology, 20: 107–122.

TOMANEY, J. (2012): Parochialism – a defence. Progress in Human Geography, 37(5): 658–672.

TOMANEY, J. (2015): Region and place II: Belonging. Progress in Human Geography, 39(4): 507–516.

TUAN, Y. F. (1975): Place: an experiential perspective. The Geographical Review, 65(2): 151–165.

VAINIKKA, J. T. (2015): Reflexive identity narratives and regional legacies. Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, 106(5): 521–535.

WANG, F. (2014): Quantitative Methods and Socio-Economic Applications in GIS. Boca Raton, CRC Press.

Moravian Geographical Reports

The Journal of Institute of Geonics of the Czech Academy of Sciences (CAS)

Journal Information


IMPACT FACTOR 2017: 1.435
5-year IMPACT FACTOR: 1.500



CiteScore 2017: 1.83

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2017: 0.408
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2017: 1.090

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 72 72 19
PDF Downloads 23 23 1