Rural identity and landscape aesthetics in exurbia: Some issues to resolve from a Central European perspective

Open access

Abstract

Although perceptions of landscape aesthetics are currently attracting great research interest, some aspects of the topic have remained almost unexamined. This review highlights some less studied areas that are of particular importance for landscape management, with special focus on rapidly growing exurban areas. While the visual quality of the environment is undoubtedly one of the drivers that has been spurring the exurban development of rural settlements, much remains unknown about the perception of the visual quality of these settlements. Another pressing issue is the need to determine general principles of consensus formation concerning visual landscape preferences. This study concludes that in order to preserve the rural character of exurban landscapes, there is an urgent need to identify the aesthetic values that define the character of rural settlements and their importance to the stakeholder groups.

AN, L., BROWN, D. G., NASSAUER, J. I., LOW, B. (2011): Variations in development of exurban residential landscapes: Timing, location, and driving forces. Journal of Land Use Science, 6(1): 13-32.

ANGILERI, V., TOCCOLINI, A. (1993): The assessment of visual quality as a tool for the conservation of rural landscape diversity. Landscape and Urban Planning, 24: 105-112.

ARENDT, D., BRABEC, E., DODSON, H. L., REID, C., YARO, R. D. (1994): Rural by Design: Maintaining Small Town Character. Washington, D.C.: APA Planners Press.

ARRIAZA, M., CAÑAS-ORTEGA, J. F., CAÑAS-MADUEÑO, J. A., RUIZ-AVILES, P. (2004): Assessing the visual quality of rural landscapes. Landscape and Urban Planning, 69: 115-125.

BANSKI, J., WESOLOWSKA, M. (2010): Transformations in housing construction in rural areas of Poland’s Lublin region-influence on the spatial settlement structure and landscape aesthetics. Landscape and Urban Planning, 94: 116-126.

BERUBE, A., SINDER, A., WILSON, J. H. FREY, W. H. (2006): Finding exurbia: America’s fast-growing communities at the metropolitan fringe. Washington, D.C.: The Brookings Institution.

BOURASSA, S. C. (1988): Toward a Theory of Landscape Aesthetics. Landscape and Urban Planning, 15: 241-252.

BOURASSA, S. C. (1990): A Paradigm for Landscape Aesthetics. Environment and Behavior, 22: 787-812.

BRABEC, E. (2001): An evaluation of the effectiveness of cluster development in the town of Southampton, New York. Urban Ecosystems, 5(1): 27-47.

BRUSH, R., CHENOWETH, R. E., BARMAN, T. (2000): Group differences in the enjoyability of driving through rural landscapes. Landscape and Urban Planning, 47(1): 39-45.

BULUT, Z., YILMAZ, H. (2009): Determination of waterscape beauties through visual quality assessment method. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 154: 459-468.

CARRUTHERS, J. I., VIAS, A. C. (2005): Urban, Suburban, and Exurban Sprawl in the Rocky Mountain West: Evidence from Regional Adjustment Models. Journal of Regional Science, 45(1): 21-48.

CHAMPION, A. G. (1998): Studying counter-urbanization and the rural population turnaround. In: Boyle, P. and Halfacree, K. [eds.]: Migration into rural areas: Theories and issues (pp. 21-40). Sussex, John Wiley.

CLAY, G. R., DANIEL, T. C. (2000): Scenic landscape assessment: the effects of land management jurisdiction on public perception of scenic beauty. Landscape and Urban Planning, 49: 1-13.

CLAY, G. R., SMIDT, R. K. (2004): Assessing the validity and reliability of descriptor variables used in scenic highway analysis. Landscape and Urban Planning, 66: 239-255.

COETERIER, J. F. (1996): Dominant attributes in the perception and evaluation of the Dutch landscape. Landscape and Urban Planning, 34: 27-44.

COUNCIL OF EUROPE (2000): European Landscape Convention. Florence, Italy.

DANIEL, T. C. (2001): Whither scenic beauty? Visual landscape quality assessment in the 21st century. Landscape and Urban Planning, 54: 267-281.

DE VAL DE LA FUENTE, G., ATAURI, A., DE LUCIO, J. C. (2006): Relationship between landscape visual attributes and spatial pattern indices: a test study in Mediterranean-climate landscape. Landscape and Urban Planning, 77: 393-407.

DEARDEN, P. (1981): Consensus and the landscape quality continuum: a research note, Landscape Research, 6: 31.

DRAMSTAD, W. E., TVEIT, M. S., FJELLSTAD, W. J., FRY, G. L. A. (2006): Relationships between visual landscape preferences and map-based indicators of landscape structure. Landscape and Urban Planning, 78: 465-474.

EBEN SALEH, M. A. (2001): Environmental cognition in the vernacular landscape: assessing the aesthetic quality of Al-Alkhalaf village, Southwestern Saudi Arabia. Building and Environment, 36: 965-979.

EWALD, K. C. (2001): The neglect of aesthetics in landscape planning in Switzerland. Landscape and Urban Planning, 54: 255-266.

FJELLSTAD, W. J., DRAMSTAD, W. E. (1999): Patterns of change in two contrasting Norwegian agricultural landscapes. Landscape and Urban Planning 45: 177-191.

FLORIDA, R., MELLANDER, C., STOLARICK, K. (2011): Beautiful Places: The Role of Perceived Aesthetic Beauty in Community Satisfaction. Regional Studies, 45: 33-48.

FOLEY, K., SCOTT, M. (2014): Accommodating new housing development in rural areas? Representations of landscape, land and rurality in Ireland. Landscape Research, 39(4): 359-386.

FRANTÁL, B., MALÝ, J., OUŘEDNÍČEK, M., NEMEŠKAL, J. (2016): Distance matters. Assessing socioeconomic impacts of the Dukovany nuclear power plant in the Czech Republic: Local perceptions and statistical evidence. Moravian Geographical Records, 21: 2-13.

FREDERICK, W. C. (2007): Nature and Business Ethics. In: Frederick, R. E. [ed.]: A Companion to Business Ethics (pp. 100-111). Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh.

FYHRI, A., JACOBSEN, J. K. S., TØMMERVIK, H. (2009): Tourists’ landscape perceptions and preferences in a Scandinavian costal region. Landscape and Urban Planning, 91: 202-211.

GOSNELL, H., ABRAMS, J. (2011): Amenity migration: diverse conceptualization of drivers, socioeconomic dimensions, and emerging challenges. GeoJournal, 76: 303-322.

HÄGERHALL, C. M. (2001): Consensus in landscape preference judgements. Journal of Environmental Psychology: 21: 83-92.

HALLEUX, J. M., MARCINCZAK, S., VAN DER KRABBEN, E. (2012): The adaptive efficiency of land use planning measured by the control of urban sprawl. The cases of the Netherlands, Belgium and Poland. Land Use Policy, 29(4): 887-898.

HAMMITT, W. E., PATTERSON, M. E., NOE, F. P. (1994): Identifying and predicting visual preference of southern Appalachian forest recreation vistas. Landscape and Urban Planning, 29: 171-183.

HART, J. F. (1995): Rural and “farm” no longer mean the same. In: Castle, E. N. [ed.]: The changing American countryside (pp. 63-76). Lawrence, University of Kansas.

HART, J. F. (1998). The rural landscape. London: The John Hopkins University Press.

HOUFKOVÁ, P., BUMERL, J., POSPÍŠIL, L., KARLÍK, P., BENEŠ, J., BERNARDOVÁ, A., HRABALÍKOVÁ, M., JANEČKOVÁ MOLNÁROVÁ, K., HEJCMAN, M. (2015): Origin and development of long-strip field patterns: A case study of an abandoned medieval village in the Czech Republic. Catena, 135: 83-91.

HOWLEY, P., HYNES, S., DONOGHUE, C. O. (2012): Countryside preferences: Exploring individuals' willingness to pay for the conservation of the traditional farm landscape. Landscape Research, 37(6): 703-719.

HUNZIKER, M. (1995): The spontaneous reafforestation in abandoned agricultural lands: perception and aesthetic assessment by locals and tourists. Landscape and urban planning, 31(1): 399-410.

HURLEY, P. T., WALKER, P. A. (2004): Whose vision? Conspiracy theory and land-use planning in Nevada County, California. Environment and Planning A, 36(9): 1529-1547.

IHATSU, E. (2005): The attractive village - enhancing character and image as sources of local wealth (pp. 201-203). The second international scientific conference: Rural development 2005, Proceedings 2. Kaunas, Lithuania.

JESSEL, B. (2006): Elements, characteristics and character - Information functions of landscapes in terms of indicators. Ecological Indicators, 6: 153-167.

JORGENSEN, A. (2011): Beyond the view: Future directions in landscape aesthetics research. Landscape and Urban Planning, 100: 353-355.

KALIVODA, O., VOJAR, J., SKŘIVANOVÁ, Z., ZAHRADNÍK, D. (2014): Consensus in landscape preference judgments: The effect of landscape visual aesthetic quality and respondent characteristics. Journal of Environmental Management 137: 36-44.

KAPLAN, S., KAPLAN, R. (1982): Cognition and Environment, Functioning in an uncertain world. New York, Praeger.

KAPLAN, A., TAŞKIN, T., ÖNENÇ, A. (2006): Assessing the visual quality of rural and urban-fringed landscapes surrounding livestock farms. Biosystems Engineering, 95(3): 437-448.

KATES, R. W. (1967): The pursuit of beauty in the environment. Landscape, 16: 21-25.

KURDOGLU, O., KURDOGLU, B. C. (2010): Determining recreational, scenic, and historical-cultural potentials of landscape features along a segment of the ancient Silk Road using factor analyzing. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 170: 99-116.

KUREK, S., WÓJTOWICZ, M., GAŁKA, J. (2015): The changing role of migration and natural increase in suburban population growth: The case of a non-capital post-socialist city (The Krakow Metropolitan Area, Poland). Moravian Geographical Reports, 23(4): 59-70.

LAGRO, J. A. (1994): Population growth beyond the urban fringe: implications for rural land use policy. Landscape and Urban Planning, 28(2): 143-158.

LAGRO JR, J. A. (1998): Landscape context of rural residential development in Southeastern Wisconsin (USA). Landscape Ecology, 13(2): 65-77.

LAPPING, M., DANIELS, T., KELLER, J. (1989): Rural Planning and Development in the United States. New York, The Guilford Press.

LITWIN, U., PLUTA, M. (2015): Spatial planning in Poland in years 1928-2003. Review and research of Acts records. Geomatics, Land management and Landscape, 4: 61-67.

LOTHIAN, A. (1999): Landscape and the philosophy of aesthetics: is landscape quality inherent in the landscape or in the eye of beholder? Landscape and Urban Planning, 44: 177-198.

LÖW, J., MÍCHAL, I. (2003): Krajinný ráz. Kostelec nad Černými Lesy, Lesnická práce.

MAIER, K. (1998): Czech planning in transition: Assets and deficiencies. International Planning Studies, 3(3): 351-365.

MARCOUILLER, D. W., LAPPING, M. B., FURUSETH, O. J. [eds.] (2011): Rural Housing, Exurbanization, and Amenity-driven Development: Contrasting the “Haves” and the “Have Nots”. Farnham, Ashgate Publishing.

NASAR, J. L., KANG, J. (1999): House style preference and meanings across taste cultures. Landscape and Urban Planning, 44(1): 33-42.

NASSAUER, J. I. (1988): Landscape care: Perceptions of local people in landscape ecology and sustainable development. Landscape and Land Use Planning, 8: 27-41.

NASSAUER, J. I. (1989): Agricultural policy and aesthetic objectives. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 44(5): 384-387.

NASSAUER, J. I. (1995): Culture and changing landscape structure. Landscape Ecology, 10(4): 229-237.

NUGA, M., METSPALU, P., ORG, A., LEETMAA, K. (2015): Planning post-summurbia: From spontaneous pragmatism to collaborative planning? Moravian Geographical Reports, 23(4): 36-46.

NUSSL, H., RINK, D. (2005): The production of urban sprawl in Eastern Germany as a phenomenon of postsocialist transformation. Cities, 22: 123-134.

ODE, Å., FRY, G.,TVEIT, M. S., MESSAGER P., MILLER, D. (2009): Indicators of perceived naturalness as drivers of landscape preference. Journal of Environmental Management, 90: 375-383.

PALMER, J. F. (2004): Using spatial metrics to predict scenic perception in a changing landscape: Dennis, Massachusetts. Landscape and Urban Planning, 69: 201-218.

PALMER, J. F., HOFFMAN, R. E. (2001): Rating reliability and representation validity in scenic landscape assessments. Landscape and Urban Planning, 54: 149-161.

PÁNEK, J., TŮMA, O. (2009): A history of the Czech lands. Prague, Karolinum

PELTAN, T. (2012): Suburbanizace a energetická náročnost dojížďky. Urbanismus a územní rozvoj, 15: 21-26.

PURCELL, A. T., LAMB, R. J. (1984): Landscape perception: an examination and empirical investigation of two central issues in the area. Journal of Environmental Management, 19: 31-63.

PURCELL, A. T., NASAR, J. L. (1992): Experiencing other people’s houses: a model of similarities and differences in environmental experience, Journal of Environmental Psychology, 12: 199-211.

PYNNONEN, D., PROPST, D., VOGT, C., MCDONOUGH, M. (2005): Role of natural and cultural features in residents’ perceptions of rural character. In: Peden, J. G. and Schuster, R. M. [eds.]: Proceedings of the 2005 Northeastern Recreation Research Symposium. Newtown Square, Pennsylvania (pp. 32-38). USDA Forest Service, Northeastern Research Station.

RECHTMAN, O. (2013): Visual perception of agricultural cultivated landscapes: Key components as predictors for landscape preferences. Landscape Research, 38(3): 273-294.

ROGGE, E., NEVENS, F., GULNICK, H. (2007): Perception of rural landscapes in Flanders: Looking beyond aesthetics. Landscape and Urban Planning, 82: 159-174.

RYAN, R. L. (2002): Preserving rural character in New England: local residents’ perceptions of alternative residential development. Landscape and Urban Planning, 61: 19-35.

SKLENICKA, P., MOLNAROVA, K., BRABEC, E., KUMBLE, P., PITTNEROVA, B., PIXOVA, K., SALEK, M. (2009): Remnants of medieval field patterns in the Czech Republic: analysis of driving forces behind their disappearance with special attention to the role of hedgerows. Agriculture, ecosystems, environment, 129(4): 465-473.

SKLENICKA, P., JANOVSKA, V., SALEK, M., VLASAK, J., MOLNAROVA, K. (2014): The Farmland Rental Paradox: extreme land ownership fragmentation as a new form of land degradation. Land Use Policy, 38: 587-593.

SKLENICKA, P., MOLNAROVA, K. (2010): Visual perception of habitats adopted for post-mining landscape rehabilitation. Environmental management, 46(3): 424-435.

SKLENICKA, P., MOLNAROVA, K., PIXOVA, K. C., SALEK, M. E. (2013): Factors affecting farmland prices in the Czech Republic. Land Use Policy, 30(1): 130-136.

SKŘIVANOVÁ, Z., KALIVODA, O., SKLENIČKA, P. (2014): Driving factors for visual landscape preferences in protected landscape areas. Scientia Agriculturae Bohemica, 45: 36-43.

STAMPS, A. E. (1990): Use of photographs to stimulate environments. A meta-analysis. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 71(33): 907-913.

STAMPS, A. E. (1994): A study in scale and character: contextual effects on environmental preferences. Journal of Environmental Management, 42: 223-245.

STAMPS, A. E. (1997): Some streets of San Francisco: preference effects of trees, cars, wires, and buildings. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 24: 81-93.

STAMPS, A. E., NASAR, J. L. (1997): Design review and public preferences: effects of geographical location, public consensus, sensation seeking, and architectural styles. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 17: 11-32.

STEWART, T. R., MIDDLETON, P., DOWNTON, M., ELY, D. (1984): Judgments of photographs vs. field observations in studies of perception and judgment of visual environment. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 4: 283-302.

STRUMSE, E. (1994): Environmental attributes and the prediction of visual preferences for agrarian landscapes in Western Norway. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 14: 293-303.

SULLIVAN, W. C. (1994): Perceptions of the rural-urban fringe: citizen preferences for natural and developed settings. Landscape and Urban Planning, 29: 85-101.

SVOBODOVA, K., SKLENICKA, P., MOLNAROVA, K., VOJAR, J. (2014): Does the composition of landscape photographs affect visual preferences? The rule of the Golden Section and the position of the horizon. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 38: 143-152.

SVOBODOVA, K., SKLENICKA, P., MOLNAROVA, K., SALEK, M. (2012): Visual preferences for physical attributes of mining and post-mining landscapes with respect to the sociodemographic characteristics of respondents. Ecological Engineering, 43: 34-44.

SWANWICK, C., LAND USE CONSULTANTS (2002): Landscape Character Assessment: Guidance for England and Scotland. Cheltenham, The Countryside Agency and Edinburgh: Scottish Natural Heritage.

SWANWICK, C. (2009): Society's attitudes to and preferences for land and landscape. Land Use Policy, 26: 62-75.

ŠPULEROVÁ, J., DOBROVODSKÁ, M., IZAKOVIČOVÁ, Z., KENDERESSY, P., ŠTEFUNKOVÁ, D., PETROVIČ, F. (2013): Developing a strategy for the protection of traditional agricultural landscapes based on a complex landscape-ecological evaluation (the case of a mountain landscape in Slovakia). Moravian Geographical Reports, 21(4): 15-26.

TAYLOR, L. (2011): No boundaries: exurbia and the study of contemporary urban dispersion. GeoJournal, 76: 323-339.

TILT, J. H., KEARNEY, A. R., BRADLEY, G. (2007): Understanding rural character: cognitive and visual perceptions. Landscape and Urban Planning, 81: 14-26.

THORBECK, D. (2012): Rural Design. A New Design Discipline. New York, Routledge.

TVEIT, M. S., ODE, Å., FRY, G. (2006): Key concepts in a framework for analysing visual landscape character. Landscape Research 31(3): 229-255.

TVEIT, M. S. (2009): Indicators of visual scale as predictors of landscape preference; a comparison between groups. Journal of Environmental Management 90: 2882-2888.

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE (1995): Landscape Aesthetics, a Handbook for Scenery Management. U.S. Dept. of Agriculture, Forest Service, Washington D.C.

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE (2004): Measuring rurality: rural-urban continuum codes, Washington, D.C.: Economic research service, USDA.

VAN DEN BERG, A. E., KOOLE, S. L. (2006): New wilderness in the Netherlands: an investigation of visual preferences for nature development landscapes. Landscape and Urban Planning, 78: 362-372.

VOREL, I., BUKÁČEK, R., MATĚJKA, P., CULEK, M., SKLENIČKA, P. (2003): A method for assessing the visual impact on landscape character of proposed construction, activities or changes in land use. Prague, Nakladatelství Naděžda Skleničková.

WALKER, P., FORTMANN, L. (2003): Whose landscape? A political ecology of the ‘exurban’ Sierra. Cultural Geographies, 10(4): 469-491.

WALKER, A. J., RYAN, R. L. (2008): Place attachment and landscape preservation in rural New England: a Maine case study. Landscape and Urban Planning, 86: 141-152.

ZABIK, M. J., PRYTHERCH, D. L. (2013): Challenges to planning for rural character: A case study from exurban southern New England. Cities, 31: 186-196.

Moravian Geographical Reports

The Journal of Institute of Geonics of the Czech Academy of Sciences (CAS)

Journal Information


IMPACT FACTOR 2018: 1,870
5-year IMPACT FACTOR: 1,858



CiteScore 2018: 2.07

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2018: 0.445
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2018: 0.877

Cited By

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 313 226 12
PDF Downloads 164 144 7