Between Anthropocentrism and Anthropomorphism: A Corpus-Based Analysis of Animal Comparisons in Shakespeare’s Plays

Open access

Abstract

The assertion of the centrality and supremacy of man, or rather, of the idea(l) of humanity, during the Renaissance period, inevitably entailed the repudiation of the animal and the beginning of the great human-animal divide. What was seen, at the time, as the re-birth of man, was also the birth of a rampant anthropocentrism which, until the recent so-called “animal turn”“ in critical and literary studies went unquestioned. Taking this into account, one would expect to find an almost exclusive focus on the human or what is/was perceived as being human in most works from that period. Yet, surprisingly, throughout Shakespeare‘s plays, one encounters a plethora of figures of animality leaping, running, crawling, flying, swimming, or advancing, as Derrida would say, “à pas de loup”“. From dogs, bears, lions, apes and foxes to birds, fish, worms and reptiles, Shakespeare the humanist paradoxically unfolds a veritable bestiary of nonhuman presences. Using corpus-based analysis that focuses on animal similes built with the preposition “like”“ and a critical angle largely informed by posthumanist theory, we take a closer look at the forms, roles and functions of both nonhuman and human animality in Shakespeare, as well as the intricate relationship between anthropocentrism and anthropomorphism.

Anthony, Laurence. AntConc (Version 3.4.3) [Computer Software]. Tokyo: Waseda University, 2014. Available from http://www.laurenceanthony.net/. Web 3 March 2016.

Boehrer, Bruce. Shakespeare among the Animals: Nature and Society in the Drama of Early Modern England, New York: Palgrave, 2002. Print.

Fudge, Erica. ―Saying Nothing Concerning the Same: On Dominion, Purity, and Meat in Early Modern England‖ in Fudge, Erica (ed), Renaissance Beasts: of Animals, Humans, and other wonderful Creatures, Chicago: University of Illinois Press, 2004.70-87. Print.

McEnery, Tony and Andrew Hardie. Corpus Linguistics: Method, Theory and Practice, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012. Print.

Meyer, Charles F. English Corpus Linguistics. An Introduction, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004.

O‘Keeffe, Anne and Michael McCarthy, eds. The Routledge Handbook of Corpus Linguistics, London: Routledge, 2010. Print.

Schmidt, Alexander. Shakespeare Lexicon and Quotation Dictionary. Berlin: Georg Reimer, 1902. Available online at: http://www.perseus.tufts.edu. Web 3 March 2016.

Shannon, Laurie. The Accommodated Animal: Cosmopolity in Shakespearean Locales, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2013. Print. Web 14 September 2015.

Stubbs, Michael. Words and Phrases. Corpus Studies of Lexical Semantics, Oxford: Blackwell Publishing, 2002. Print.

Linguaculture

The Journal of Linguaculture Centre for (Inter)cultural and (Inter)lingual Research, Alexandru Ioan Cuza University of Iasi

Journal Information

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 71 71 23
PDF Downloads 18 18 8