Shakespeare’s Weird Sisters – In Between Outlandish Womanhood and Prophesing Moirae

Open access


This study intends to map the meandering expression of otherness when womanhood constructs an epiphanic encounter with time and fortune. Hereinafter, hegemonic, oppressive masculinity meets peripheral, prophesying femininity in an intricate exercise of doing and becoming Shakespeare‘s Weird Sisters, forming a complex mythological construction, whose uniqueness arises from the duality of their personae, reflection of displaced femininity, somewhat grotesque, peripheral within the realm of marginality itself. They are not only weird expressions of the Other, they are the other self of themselves, as alter ego expressions. There is a constant, minutely woven border crossing that does not only (re)define the geometry of becoming, but it also permeates gender constructions, making femaleness look androgynous and ruthless. Foretelling dreams of glory, mightiness or summoning lost humanity, these three Parcae rewrite the myth of the androgynous and its story about the quest of the Other. It is this Other that will be explored from a variety of angles that speak of masculinity, femininity, sanity, irrationality, consciousness, unconsciousness, freewill and fate.

Barney, Rachel. Names and Nature in Plato‟s Cratylus. New York: Taylor & Francis, 2001. Print.

Coşeriu, Eugeniu. Istoria filozofiei limbajului. De la începuturi până la Rousseau. Bucureşti: Humanitas Press, 2011. Print.

Dent, Edward J. Opera. Middlesex: Penguin Books, 1965. Print.

Geldard, Richard G. Remembering Heraclitus. Lindisfarne Books, 2000. Print.

Harris, Anthony. Night‟s Black Agents: Witchcraft and Magic in Seventeenth-Century English Drama. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1980. Print.

Jay, Nancy. ―Gender and dichotomy‖. Feminist Studies 7: (1981). Print.

Jorgenson, Paul A. Our Naked Frailties: Sensational Art and Meaning in Macbeth. Los Angeles: University of California Press, 1971. Print.

Keynes, Geoffrey. Drawings of William Blake: 92 pencil studies. Courier Dover Publications, 1970. Print.

Klein, Ernest. A Comprehensive Etymological Dictionary of the English Language. Volume II. Elsevier Publishing Company, 1966. Print.

Knight, Wilson G. The Wheel of Fire (1930), 2nd Routledge edition, 2001. Print.

Hartnoll, Phyllis. Shakespeare in Music. London: Macmillan, 1966. Print.

Lorber, Judith. ―Night to His Day: The Social Construction of Gender‖. Paradoxes of Gender, Yale: Yale University Press, 1994. 32-36. Print.

Middleton, Thomas. The Witch. London: A&C Black, 1994. Print.

Purkiss, Diane. The Witch in History: early modern and twentieth-century representations. London: Routledge, 1996. Print.

Sedley, David. ―Plato‘s Cratylus‖. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Fall 2013. Ed. N. Zalta. n. d. Web. 20 July 2016.

Shamas, Laura. We Three: The Mythology of Shakespeare‟s Weird Sisters. New York: Lang, 2007. Print.

Stallybrass, Peter. ―Macbeth and witchcraft‖ in Focus on Macbeth. Ed. John Russel Brown. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1982. 189-209. Print.

Whalen, Richard F. ―The Scottish/Classical Hybrid Witches in Macbeth‖, Brief Chronicles IV, 59-72. 2012-13. Print.

Willis, Deborah. Malevolent Nurture: Witch-Hunting and Maternal Power in Early Modern England. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1995. Print.

Wills, Garry. Witches and Jesuits: Shakespeare‟s Macbeth. New York: Oxford University Press, 1995. Print.


The Journal of Linguaculture Centre for (Inter)cultural and (Inter)lingual Research, Alexandru Ioan Cuza University of Iasi

Journal Information


All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 187 187 43
PDF Downloads 90 90 23