Overcoming Dyadic Boundaries: Reading Poetic Experience after the Semiotics and Pragmatism of Charles S. Peirce

Open access


The aim of this article is to offer a reading of the poetic experience through the scope of the semiotics and pragmatism of Chares S. Peirce. Such a reading through semiotics and pragmatism unveils deeper levels of the process of interpretation involving abduction, an inference through which new meanings implied in the semantic tensions arise. Methodologically, the article begins with Roman Jakobson’s realisation that only a broader semiotical context, which breaches the boundaries of the dyadic components of significant and signified scope of structuralism, enables the access to deeper levels of poetic events. The article’s author then discusses the limitations of the dyadic relations of structuralism and, as a broader processual framework to assess poeticity, sets out to discuss the poetic experience from the perspective of pragmatism and its all-encompassing logic of abduction.

[1] Levin, R., 2010. Der Beitrag des Prager Strukturalismus zur Translationswissenschaft. Linguistik und Semiotik der literarischen Übersetzung. Berlin, Frank & Timme Verlag für wissenschaftliche Literatur.

[2] Saussure, F. de., 2013. Cours de linguistique générale. Zweisprachige Ausgabe französischdeutsch mit Einleitung, Anmerkung und Kommentar von Peter Wunderli (Ed.). Tübingen, Narr Francke Attempto Verlag GmbH.

[3] Da Costa e Silva, T., 2018. The logic of design process. Invention and discovery in light of the semiotics of Charles S. Peirce. Bielefeld: Transcript Verlag.

[4] Short, T. L., 2007. Peirce’s theory of signs. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.

[5] Nöth, W., 2000. Handbook der Semiotik. Stuttgart/Weimar: Metzler.

[6] Eco, U., 1987. The influence of Roman Jakobson on the development of semiotics. Classics of Semiotics. New York: Plenum Press, 109–128.

[7] Jakobson, R., 1960. Linguistics and poetics. In Sebeok, T. (Ed.), Style in language. Massachusetts/New York/London: Technology Press of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology/John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 350–377.

[8] Cassirer, E., 1962. An Essay on man. New Haven, CN: Yale University Press.

[9] Jakobson, R., Pomorska, K., 1988 Dialogues. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

[10] Waugh, Linda R., 1980. The poetic function in the theory of Roman Jakobson. Poetics Today, 2(1), 57-82.

[11] Da Costa e Silva, T., 2016. A Linguagem Poética do Cinema de Animação. Lisbon: Nova Edições Acadêmicas.

[12] Hausman, C., 1989. Metaphor and art. Interactionism and reference in the verbal and nonverbal arts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

[13] Eco, U., 1968. La Struttura Assente. Milano: Bompiani.

[14] Ehrat, J., 2005. Cinema & semiotic. Peirce and film aesthetics, narration, and representation. Toronto/Buffalo/London: University of Toronto Press.

[15] Lotman, Y., 1990. Universe of the mind. A semiotic theory of culture. Bloomington and Indianapolis, IN: Indiana University Press.

[16] Peirce, C S., 1897. The logic of relatives. The Monist, 7(2), 161–217.

[17] Robin, R., 1967. Annotated catalogue of the papers of Charles S. Peirce. Amherst, MA: University of Massachusetts Press.

[18] Robin, R., 1971. The Peirce papers: A supplementary catalogue. The Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society, 7(1), 37–57.

[19] Peirce, C S., 1905. Issues of pragmaticism. The Monist, 15(4), 481–499.

[20] Zalamea, F., 2010. A categorial-theoretic reading of Peirce’s system: Pragmaticism, continuity, and the existential graphs. In Moore, M. (Ed.), New essays on Peirce’s mathematical philosophy. Chicago/La Salle, IL: Open Court, pp. 203–234.

[21] Peirce, C S., 1998. The Essential Peirce: Selected Philosophical Writings, vol. 2. Houser, N., Kloesel, CJW. (Eds.) Bloomington: Indiana University Press, [References are abbreviated as “EP” followed by volume and page numbers].

Journal Information


All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 54 54 17
PDF Downloads 53 53 28