Speech Act of Threat in Everyday Conflict Discourse: Production and Perception

Open access

Abstract

The article explores pragmasemantic aspects of the speech act of threat (SAT) in everyday conflict discourse, using examples from Russian colloquial speech. The authors analyze the impact of direct and indirect threats on the addressee from the point of view of the theory of speech acts, biopsychology, and physiology, which makes it possible to understand the nature of SATs and identify the key communicative and semantic factors of this type of speech acts.

Antsupov, A.J. &Shipilov, A.I. (2000). Conflictology. Moscow: Yuniti. / Antsupov A.J., Shipilov A.I. Konfliktologia. Moskva: Yuniti. / Анцупов А.Я., Шипилов А.И. Конфликтология. Москва: Юнити.

Apresyan, V.Yu. (2003). Implicit aggression in language. In Computer linguistics and IT: Proceedings of international scientific conference “Dialogue-2003” (June, 11-16, 2003, Protvino, Russia), p. 32-35. / Apresyan V.Yu. Implitsitnaya agressiya v yazyke. In Komp’yuternaya lingvistika i intellektual’nye tekhnologii: Trudy mezhdunarodnoj konferentsii “Dialog-2003” (Iyun’, 11-16, 2003, Protvino, Rossiya), s. 32-35. / Апресян В.Ю. Имплицитная агрессия в языке. In Компьютерная лингвистика и интеллектуальные технологии: Труды международной конференции “Диалог-2003” (Июнь, 11-16, 2003, Протвино, Россия), c. 32-35.

Austin, J.L. (1962). How to do things with words. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Belous, N.A. (2008). Conflict discourse in the communicative space: Semantic and pragmatic aspects. Synopsis for thesis for the doctor degree in philology. Speciality 10.02.19 – theory of language. Krasnodar: Kuban state university. / Belous N.A. Konfkliktnyj diskurs v kommunikativnom prostranstve: Semanticheskiye i pragmaticheskiye aspekty. Avtoreferat dissertatsii na soiskaniye uchyonoj stepeni kandidata filologicheskikh nauk. Spetsial’nost’ 10.02.19 – teoriya yazyka. Krasnodar: Kubanskij gosudarstvennyj universitet. / Белоус Н.А. Конфликтный дискурс в коммуникативном пространстве: Cемантические и прагматические аспекты. Автореферат диссертации на соискание ученой степени доктора филологических наук. Специальность 10.02.19 – теория языка. Краснодар: Кубанский государственный университет. Available at: http://tverlingua.ru/archive/013/10_belous.pdf

Brown, P. &Levinson, S. (2009). Politeness: Some universals in language usage. In Sociolinguistics: Critical concepts [volume III: Interactional sociolinguistics]. Jaworski, A. &Coupland, N. (eds.). London: Routledge, p. 311-324.

Caradeux, D.A. &Salom, L.G. (2013). Social representation of gender in award-winner short films in Spain. In Procedia – social and behavioral sciences, 95, p. 126-135.

Carver, C.S. &White, T.L. (1994). Behavioural inhibition, behavioural activation and affective responses to impending reward and punishment: The BIS/BAS scales. In Journal of personality and social psychology, 67, p. 319-333.

Cartwright, J.P.W. (1984). An evidentiary theory of promises. In Mind, 93 (370), p. 230-248.

Chen, I.-S. &Tseng F.-T. (2016).The relevance of communication media in conflict contexts and their effectiveness: A negotiation experiment. In Computers in human behavior, 59, p.134-141.

Chesnokov, I.I. (2015). The discoursive tactic of threat: Indirect forms of presentation: Warnings. In News of Volgograd state pedagogical university, 2 (97), p. 132-138. / Chesnokov I.I. Diskursivnaya taktika ugrozy: Kosvennye formy objektivatsii (preduprezhdeniya). In Izvestiya Volgogradskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta, 2 (97), s. 132-138. / Чесноков И.И. Дискурсивная тактика угрозы: Косвенные формы объективации (предупреждения). In Известия Волгоградского государственного педагогического университета, 2 (97), Волгоград, c. 132-138. Available at: https://elibrary.ru/download/elibrary_23409431_98142983.pdf

Curseu, P.L., Boros, S. &Oerlemans, L.A. (2012). Task and relationship conflict in short-term and long-term groups: The critical role of emotion regulation. In International journal of conflict management, 23 (1), p. 97-107.

Dymond, S., Dunsmoor J., Vervliet, B. et al. (2015). Fear generalization in humans: Systematic review and implications for anxiety disorder research. In Behavior therapy, 46, p. 561-582.

Epshtein, O.V. (2008). Communicative and speech strategies and methods of threat realization in political discourse. In Newsletter of Orenburg state pedagogical university, 1, p. 27-33. / Epshtein O.V. Kommunikativno-rechevyye strategii i priyomy realizatsii ugrozy v politicheskom diskurse. In Vestnik Orenburgskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta, 1, s. 27-33. / Эпштейн О.В. Коммуникативно-речевые стратегии и приемы реализации угрозы в политическом дискурсе. In Вестник Оренбургского государственного педагогического университета, 1, c. 27-33.

Fedoriv, Ya. (2016). Speaking to the global audience: A case study into the message transformation. In Lege artis. Language yesterday, today, tomorrow. The journal of University of SS Cyril and Methodius in Trnava, Warsaw: De Gruyter Open, 1 (2), p. 1-36. Available at: https://www.degruyter.com/downloadpdf/j/lart.2016.1.issue-2/lart-2016-0009/lart-2016-0009.pdf

Fiorelli, L. (2016). What movies show: Realism, perception and truth in film. PhD dissertation thesis. Available at: https://repository.upenn.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?referer=https://www.google.ru/&httpsredir=1&article=3501&context=edissertations

Fomicheva, E.V. (2010). Sentences with a verb in the future tense as a means of expressing motivation in the English language: A complex approach. In The almanac of modern science and education, 3 (2), p. 168-170. / Fomicheva E.V. Predlozheniya s glagolom v buduschem vremeni kak sredstva vyrazheniya pobuditel’nosti v anglijskom yazyke: Kompleksnyj podhod. In Al’manakh sovremennoj nauki i obrazovaniya, 3 (2), s. 168-170. / Фомичева Е.В. Предложения с глаголом в будущем времени как средства выражения побудительности в английском языке: Комплексный подход. In Альманах современной науки и образования, 3 (2), с. 168-170.

Fritsche, I., Jonas, E. &Kessler, T. (2011). Collective reactions to threat: Implications for intergroup conflict and for solving societal crises. In Social issues and policy review, 5 (1), p. 101-136. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-2409.2011.01027.x

Gray, J. (1987). Neuropsychology of emotions and structure of personality. In Journal of highest nervous activity, 37 (6), p. 1011-1024. / Grej Dzh. Nejropsikhologiya i struktura lichnosti. In Zhurnal vysshej nervnoj deyatel’nosti, 37 (6), s. 1011-1024. / Грей Дж. Нейропсихология эмоций и структура личности. In Журнал высшей нервной деятельности, 37 (6), c. 1011-1024.

Greenberg, J., Martens, A., Jonas, E. et al. (2003). Psychological defense in anticipation of anxiety: Eliminating the potential for anxiety eliminates the effect of mortality salience on worldview defense. In Psychological science, 14 (5), p. 516-519. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280.03454.

Jing-Schmidt, Z. &Kapatsinski, V. (2012). The apprehensive: Fear as endophoric evidence and its pragmatics in English, Mandarin, and Russian. In Journal of pragmatics, 44 (4), p. 346-373.

Jonas, E., McGregor, I., Klackl, J. et al. (2014). Threat and defense: From anxiety to approach advances. In Experimental social psychology, 49, p. 219-286.

Karasik, V.I. (2000). On the types of discourse. In Linguistic personality: Institutional and personal discourse. Karasik V.I. &Slyshkin G.G. (eds.). Volgograd: Volgograd state pedagogical university press, p. 5-20. / Karasik V.I. O tipakh diskursa. In Yazykovaya lichnost’: Institutsional’nyj i personal’nyj diskurs. Karasik V.I. &Slyshkin G.G. (red.). Volgograd: Izdatel’stvo Volgogradskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta, s. 5-20. / Карасик В.И. О типах дискурса. In Языковая личность: Институциональный и персональный дискурс. Карасик В.И. &Слышкин Г.Г. (ред.). Волгоград: Издательство Волгоградского государственного педагогического университета, c. 5-20.

Karaziya, N.A. (2006). Pragmatic research of conflict discourse. In Newsletter of Kamchatka regional association “Scientific-educational centre”. Humanitarian sciences, 2, p. 72-88. / Karaziya N.A. Lingvopragmaticheskoye issledovaniye konfliktnogo diskursa. In Vestnik Kamchatskoj regional’noj assotsiatsii “Uchebnonauchnyj tsentr”. Gumanitarnyye nauki, 2, s. 72-88. / Каразия Н.А. Лингвопрагматическое исследование конфликтного дискурса. In Вестник Камчатской региональной ассоциации “Учебно-научный центр”. Гуманитарные науки, 2, c. 72-88.

Kaushal, R. &Kwantes, C.T. (2006). The role of culture and personality in choice of conflict management strategy. In International journal of intercultural relations, 30, p. 579-603.

Kissine, M. (2013). From utterances to speech acts. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Kozloff, S. (2000). Overhearing film dialogue. Oakland: University of California Press, Berkeley.

Kubareva, E.E. (1977). Explicit and implicit performative constructions in English (in comparison with Russian). In Comparative linguistic analysis, 202, p. 3-80. / Kubareva E.E. Eksplitsitnyye i implitsitnyye pobuditel’nyye konstruktsii v anglijskom yazyke (v sopostavlenii s russkim). In Sopostavitel’nyj lingvisticheskij analiz, 202, s. 3-80. / Кубарева Е.Е. Эксплицитные и имплицитные побудительные конструкции в английском языке (в сопоставлении с русским). In Сопоставительный лингвистический анализ, 202, c. 3-80.

Leech, G.N. (1983). Principles of pragmatics. London: Longman.

Limberg, H. (2009). Impoliteness and threat responses. In Journal of pragmatics, 41, p. 1376-1394.

McGregor, I., Nash, K., Mann, N. et al. (2010). Anxious uncertainty and reactive approach-motivation (RAM). In Journal of personality and social psychology, 99 (1), p. 133-147.

Martynova, I.A. (2006). Functional and pragmatic field of menacive speech acts. Synopsis for thesis for the candidate degree in philology. Speciality 10.02.04 – Germanic languages. Samara: Samara state pedagogical university. / Martynova I.A. Funktsional’no-pragmaticheskoye pole menasivnykh rechevykh aktov. Avtoreferat dissertatsii na soiskaniye uchyonoj stepeni kandidata filologicheskikh nauk. Spetsial’nost’ 10.02.04 – germanskiye yazyki. Samara: Samarskij gosudarstvennyj pedagogicheskij universitet. / Мартынова И.А. Функционально-прагматическое поле менасивных речевых актов. Автореферат диссертации на соискание ученой степени кандидата филологических наук. Специальность 10.02.04 – германские языки. Самара: Самарский государственный педагогический университет.

Maslova, A.Yu. (2007). Introduction to pragmalinguistics. Moscow: Flinta: Nauka. / Maslova A.Yu. Vvedeniye v pragmalingvistiku. Moskva: Flinta: Nauka. / Маслова А.Ю. Введение в прагмалингвистику. Москва: Флинта: Наука.

Mehrabian, A. (1968). Communication without words. In Psychology today, 2 (4), p. 53-56.

Mehrabian, A. &Wiener, M. (1967). Decoding of inconsistent communications. In Journal of personality and social psychology, 6, p. 108-114.

Nicoloff, F. (1989). Threats and illocutions. In Journal of pragmatics, 113, p. 501-522.

Novoselova, O.V. (2013). Functional and semantic characteristics of discursive practices with the meaning of threat in the English language. Synopsis for thesis for the candidate degree in philology. Speciality 10.02.04 – Germanic languages. Tver’: Tver’ state university. / Novosyolova O.V. Funktsional’no-semanticheskaya kharakteristika diskursivnykh praktik so znacheniyem ugrozy v anglijskom yazyke. Avtoreferat dissertatsii na soiskaniye uchyonoj stepeni kandidata filologicheskikh nauk. Spetsial’nost’ 10.02.04 – germanskiye yazyki. Tver’: Tverskoj gosudarstvennyj universitet. / Новоселова О.В. Функционально-семантическая характеристика дискурсивных практик со значением угрозы в английском языке. Автореферат диссертации на соискание ученой степени кандидата филологических наук. Специальность 10.02.04 – германские языки. Тверь: Тверской государственный университет.

Novoselova, O., Romanov, A. &Romanova, L. (2015). Communicative construct of the composite threat-performatives. In Procedia – social and behavioral sciences, 206, p. 71-75.

Ohm, E. &Thompson, V. (2004). Everyday reasoning with inducements and advice. In Thinking &reasoning, 10 (3), p. 241-272.

Perelmutter, R. (2018). Globalization, conflict discourse, and Jewish identity in an Israeli Russian-speaking online community. In Journal of pragmatics (article in press). Piazza, R. (2006). The representation of conflict in the discourse of Italian melodrama. In Journal of pragmatics, 38 (12), p. 2087-2104.

Pocheptsov, G.G. (2001). Theory of communication. Moscow: Refl-buk. / Pocheptsov G.G. Teoriya kommunikatsii. Moskva: Refl-buk. / Почепцов Г.Г. Теория коммуникации. Москва: Рефл-бук.

Probst, N.A. &Vasilyev, S.L. (2016). Functional and semantic aspects of threat in requestive speech acts (based on the Soviet and Russian feature films). In Newsletter of Immanuel Kant Baltic federal university. Philology, pedagogy, psychology, 4, p. 28-34. / Probst N.A., Vasil’yev S.L. Funktsional’no-semanticheskiye osobennosti ugrozy rekvestivnogo tipa (na materiale sovetskikh i rossijskikh khudozhestvennykh fil’mov). In Vestnik Baltijskogo federal’nogo universiteta imeni Immanuila Kanta. Filologiya, pedagogika, psikhologiya, 4, s. 28-34. / Пробст Н.А., Васильев С.Л. Функционально-семантические особенности угрозы реквестивного типа (на материале советских и российских художественных фильмов). In Вестник Балтийского федерального университета имени Иммануила Канта. Филология, педагогика, психология, 4, с. 28-34.

Rahim, M.A. (2015). Managing conflict in organizations. New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers.

Romanov, A.A. (1988). System analysis of regulative means of dialogue interaction. Moscow: The Institute of linguistics of the Academy of Sciences of USSR. / Romanov A.A. Sistemnyj analiz regulyativnykh sredstv dialogicheskogo obshcheniya. Moskva: Institut yazykoznaniya Akademii nauk SSSR. / Романов А.А. Системный анализ регулятивных средств диалогического общения. Москва: Институт языкознания АН СССР.

Romanova, L.A. (2009). Structural and semantic aspects of the performatives in the functional paradigm of the language. Moscow-Tver’: The Institute of linguistics of the Russian Academy of Sciences. / Romanova L.A. Strukturno-semanticheskiye aspekty performativov v funktsional’noj paradigme jazyka. Moskva-Tver’: Institut lingvistiki Rossijskoj akademii nauk. / Романова Л.А. Структурно-семантические аспекты композитных перформативов в функциональной парадигме языка. Москва-Тверь: Институт лингвистики Российской академии наук.

Rubin, J., Pruitt, D. &Kim, S.H. (2001). Social conflict: Escalation, impasse, resolution. St. Petersburg: Prajm-Evroznak. / Rubin Dzh., Prujtt D. &Kim S.Kh. Sotsial’nyj konflikt: Eskalatsiya, tupik, razresheniye. Sankt-Peterburg: Prajm-Evroznak. / Рубин Дж., Пруйт Д. &Ким С.Х. Социальный конфликт: Эскалация, тупик, разрешение. Санкт-Петербург: Прайм-Еврознак.

Sadykova, I.A. (2016). Ethno-speech taboos in conflict discourse. In Philology &culture, 2 (44), p. 122-125. / Sadykova I.A. Etnorechevyye zaprety v structure konfliktnogo diskursa. In Filologiya i kultura, 2 (44), s. 122-125. / Садыкова И.А. Этноречевые запреты в структуре конфликтного дискурса. In Филология и культура, 2 (44), c. 122-125.

Salgueiro, A.B. (2010). Promises, threats, and the foundations of speech act theory. In Pragmatics, 20 (2), p. 213-228. Available at: https://journals.linguisticsociety.org/elanguage/pragmatics/article/download/2569/2569-5290-1-PB.pdf

Sami, S. (2015). The differences between threat and promise acts. In International research journal of humanities &social science, 1 (3), p. 46-53.

Searle, J.R. (1969). Speech acts: An essay in the philosophy of language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Searle, J.R. (1975). A taxonomy of illocutionary acts. In Language, mind and knowledge, 7, p. 344-369. Available at: https://conservancy.umn.edu/handle/11299/185220

Searle, J.R. (1979). Expression and meaning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Seyranyan, M.Yu. (2016). Conflict discourse and its prosodic structure. Moscow: Moscow city pedagogical university press. / Seyranyan M.Yu. Konfliktnyj diskurs i yego prosodicheskij stroj. Moskva: Izdatel’stvo Moskovskogo gorodskogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta. / Сейранян М.Ю. Конфликтный дискурс и его просодический строй. Москва: Издательство Московского городского педагогического университета.

Scherbatykh, Yu.V. &Nozdrachev, A.D. (2000). Physiology and psychology of fear. In Nature, 5, p. 61-67. / Scherbatykh Yu.V., Nozdrachev A.D. Fiziologiya i psikhologiya strakha. In Priroda, 5, s. 61-67. / Щербатых Ю.В., Ноздрачев А.Д. Физиология и психология страха. In Природа, 5, c. 61-67. Available at: http://in.1543.ru/VIVOVOCO/VV/JOURNAL/NATURE/05_00/05_61-67.HTM

Shkapenko, T.M. &Vertelova, I.Yu. (2018). Markers of hostility speech in Internet comments to the translated articles in the Polish media. In Political linguistics, 40 (70), p. 104-111. / Shkapenko, T.M., Vertelova, I.Yu. Markery yazyka vrazhdy v internetkommentariyah k perevodnym stat’yam pol’skikh SMI. In Politicheskaya lingvistika, 40 (70), s. 104-111. / Шкапенко Т.М., Вертелова И.Ю. Маркеры языка вражды в интернет-комментариях к переводным статьям польских СМИ. In Политическая лингвистика, 40 (70), c. 104-111.

Smith, D. (1997). Language and discourse in conflict and conflict resolution. In Current issues in language and society, 4 (3), p. 190-214.

Tsohatzidis, S.L. (1994). Foundation of speech act theory: Philosophical and linguistic perspectives. London: Taylor and Francis.

Van den Bos, K. &Miedema, J. (2000). Toward understanding why fairness matters: The influence of mortality salience on reactions to procedural fairness. In Journal of personality and social psychology, 79 (3), p. 355-366.

Vendler, Z. (1985). Illocutionary suicide. In New in foreign linguistics, 16, p. 238-251. / Vendler Z. Illokutivnoye samoubijstvo. In Novoye v zarubezhnoj lingvistike, 16, s. 238-251. / Вендлер 3. Иллокутивное самоубийство. In Новое в зарубежной лингвистике, 16, c. 238-251.

Wierzbicka, A. (1985). The speech acts. In New in foreign linguistics, 16, p. 43-65. / Werzbitska A. Rechevyye akty. In Novoye v zarubezhnoj lingvistike, 16, s. 43-65. / Вежбицка А. Речевые акты. In Новое в зарубежной лингвистике, 16, c. 43-65.

Wunderlich, D. (1976). Studien zur Sprechakttheorie. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.

Zamfir, M.V. (2017). Verbal and non-verbal communication in sport environment. In Marathon, 9 (1), p. 99-106.

Zhuchkov, D.O. (2009). On defining and classifying the speech act of threat. In Newsletter of Voronezh state university. Linguistics and intercultural communication, 2, p. 69-71. / Zhuchkov D.O. K voprosu ob opredelenii i klassifikatsionnoj prinadlezhnosti rechevogo akta ugrozy. In Vestnik Voronezhskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Lingvistika i mezhkul’turnaya kommunikatsiya, 2, s. 69-71. / Жучков Д.О. К вопросу об определении и классификационной принадлежности речевого акта угрозы. In Вестник Воронежского государственного университета. Лингвистика и межкультурная коммуникация, 2, с. 69-71.

Zhuchkov, D.O. (2010). Speech act of threat as an object of pragmalinguistic analysis (on the material of the English language). Synopsis for thesis for the candidate degree in philology. Speciality 10.02.04 – Germanic languages. Voronezh: Voronezh state university. / Zhuchkov D.O. Rechevoj akt ugrozy kak obyekt pragmalingvisticheskogo analiza (na materiale anglijskogo yazyka). Avtoreferat dissertatsii na soiskaniye uchyonoj stepeni kandidata filologicheskikh nauk. Spetsial’nost’ 10.02.04 – germanskiye yazyki. Voronezh: Voronezhskij gosudarstvennyj universitet. / Жучков Д.О. Речевой акт угрозы как объект прагмалингвистического анализа (на материале английского языка). Автореферат диссертации на соискание ученой степени кандидата филологических наук. Специальность 10.02.04 – германские языки. Воронеж: Воронежский государственный университет.

The brother. (1997) [a segment of the film]. Director: Balabanov, A. Starring: Bodrovjr., S. Russia: STV. Available at: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aDaaCGZz-Ok&feature=youtu.be&t=30856&end=3112

The collector. (2017). [a segment of the film]. Director: Krasovskiy, A. Starring: Khabenskiy, K. Russia: All Media. Available at: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9c0F9E-xYd4

The man at the window. (2009). [a segment of the film]. Director: Meskhiev, D. Starring: Stoyanov, Yu. Russia: Flagman-Trade. Available at: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4buY-HMYhS4

The thief. (1997). [a segment of the film]. Director: Chukhray, P. Starring: Mashkov, V. Russia-France: NTV-Profit. Available at: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1MGvFJkME7c

Lege Artis

Language yesterday, today, tomorrow

Journal Information

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 292 292 17
PDF Downloads 238 238 20