The conceptual and semantic shift of “noble” and its synonyms as a case of semiosis

Open access


The paper explores the interrelation between the socially biased phenomena, affecting the conceptual domain of “knighthood” in the XIII-XV centuries. Nobility and knighthood as interrelated conceptual entities became increasingly complicated, due to cultural semiosis, which brought about drastic conceptual and semantic changes in the adjectives under scrutiny: worthy, noble, gentle. The analysis of corpus and lexicographic material as well as romances of the period demonstrated that conceptual changes became the major triggers for the large-scale semantic changes within the category.

List of abbreviationsB&T –

Bosworth-Toller Anglo-Saxon Dictionary


Middle English dictionary


Oxford English Dictionary


  • Akhmanova, O.S. & Idzelis, R. (1979). Linguistics and semiotics. Moscow. Moscow University Press.

  • Arakin, V.D. (2007). Essays on the history of the English language. Moscow: FISMALIT. / Arakin V.D. Ocherki po istorii anglijskogo jazyka. Moskva: FIZMALIT. / Аракин В.Д. Очерки по истории английского язика. Москва: ФИЗМАТЛИТ.

  • Ardila, A. (2016). L.S. Vygotsky in the 21st century. In Psychology in Russia: State of the art, 9 (4), p. 4-15.

  • Baum, R. (1977). Emile Benvenistes Auseinandersetzung mit dem sprachtheoretischen Ansatz Ferdinand de Saussures. In Systemlinguistik und Sprechakt, IF, 82, p. 1-38.

  • Beckner, C., Blythe, R., Bybee, J., et al. (2009). Language is a complex adaptive system: Position paper. In Language learning, 59, p. 1-26.

  • Benveniste, E. (1979). Problemes de linguistique generale, Paris: Collection Tel.

  • Berdnikova, D. (2011). Nobility as a marker of mentality in Medieval England (based on Anglo-Scottish ballads). In Language and linguistic activity in the interdisciplinary space: a collection of articles of the international conference. Saint Petersburg: Saint Petersburg University of economics and finance, p. 111-114. / Berdnikova D. Znatnost’ kak pokazatel’ mentaliteta v srednevekovoj Anglii (na primere anglo-shotlandskikh skazok. In Jazyk i rechevaja dejatel’nost’ v mezhdistsiplinarnom prostranstve: Sbornik statej po materialam mezhdunarodnoj konferencii: Sankt-Petersburg: Sankt-Petersburgskij Universitet ekonomiki i finansov, s. 111-114. / Бердникова Д. Знатность как показатель менталитета в средневековой Англии (на примере англо-шотландских сказок). In Язык и речевая деятельность в междисциплинарном пространстве: Сборник статей по материалам международной конференции. Санкт-Петербург: Санкт-Петербургcкий Государственный университет экономики и финансов, c. 111-114.

  • Baudouin de Courtenay, I.A. (1963). Selected papers in linguistics in two volumes. Moscow: The publishing house of USSR Academy of sciences. Vol. 2. / Boduen de Kurtene I.A. Izbrannye raboty po jazykoznaniju: v 2 tomakh. Tom 2. Moskva: Izdatel’stvo Akademii nauk SSSR. / Бодуэн де Куртенэ И.А. Избранные работы по языкознанию: в 2 томах. Том 2. Москва: Издательство Академии наук СССР.

  • Biber, D., Conrad, S. & Reppen, R. (1998). Corpus linguistics: Investigating language structure and use. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Binder, J.R., Desai, R.H., Graves, W.W. & Conant, L.L. (2009). Where is the semantic system? A critical review and meta-analysis of 120 functional neuroimaging studies. In Cerebral cortex, 19 (12), p. 2767-2796.

  • Blank, A. (1999). Why do new meanings occur? A cognitive typology of the motivations for lexical semantic change. In Historical semantics and cognition, Blank, A. & Koch, P. (eds.). Berlin-New York: Mouton de Gruyter, p. 61-89.

  • Blank, A. (2003). Words and concepts in time: Towards diachronic cognitive onomasiology. In Words in time. Diachronic semantics from different points of view, 143. Eckardt, R., von Heusinger, K. & Schwarze, C. (eds.). Berlin-New York: Walter de Gruyter, p. 37-65.

  • Bosworth & Toller Anglo-Saxon Dictionary. Available at:

  • Brandt, L. (2008). Literary studies in the age of cognitive science. In Cognitive semiotics, 2 (Supplement), p. 6-4.

  • Brandt, P.A. (2004). Spaces, domains, and meaning. Essays in cognitive semiotics. European semiotics series, 4. Bern: Peter Lang.

  • Cobley, P. & Randviir, A. (2009). Sociosemiotics. In The Routledge companion to semiotics. London: Routledge, p. 118-135.

  • Collazos, M. (2016). Design semiotics with an agentive approach: An alternative to current semiotic analysis of artifacts. In Meaning, mind and communication. Explorations in cognitive semiotics, Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang, p. 83-99.

  • CONLEE, J. W. (1998). Prose Merlin. Kalamazoo, Mich, Published for TEAMS in association with the University of Rochester by Medieval Institute Publications, Western Michigan University.

  • Corpus methods for semantics: Quantitative studies in polysemy and synonymy, 43. (2014). Glynn, D. & Robinson, J.A. (eds.). Amsterdam-Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.

  • Clausner, T.C. & Croft, W. (1999). Domains and image schemas. In Cognitive linguistics, 10, p. 1-32.

  • Duggan, A.J. (2000) Introduction. In Nobles and nobility in medieval Europe: Concepts, origins, transformations. Woodbridge: Boydell & Brewer Ltd.

  • Dummet, M. (1993). What is a theory of meaning? In The seas of language. Oxford: Oxford University Press, p. 34-93.

  • Eco, U. (1986). Semiotics and the philosophy of language. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

  • Evans, V. (2009). How words mean: Lexical concepts, cognitive models, and meaning-construction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Field, P. (1971). Romance and chronicle: a study of Malory’s prose style. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

  • Field, P. (1982) [2008]. Introduction. Le Morte Darthur the seventh and eighth tales. The London Medieval and Renaissance series. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Company.

  • Ford, B. (1992). Cambridge cultural history of Britain: Modern Britain. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Frank, R.M. & Gontier, N. (2010). On constructing a research model for historical cognitive linguistics (HCL): Some theoretical considerations. In Historical cognitive linguistics, 47, Cognitive linguistics series. Berlin-New York: Mouton De Gruyter, p. 31-69.

  • Frege, G. (1948). Sense and reference. In The philosophical review, 57 (3), p. 209-230.

  • Geeraerts, D. (2010). Salience phenomena in the lexicon. A typology. In Words and other wonders. Papers on lexical and semantic topics. Cognitive linguistics series, Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, p. 74-96.

  • Geeraerts, D. (2016). The sociosemiotic commitment. In Cognitive linguistics, 27 (4), p. 527-542.

  • Geeraerts, D., Grondelaers, S. et al. (1999). What’s in a word: Lexicology. In Cognitive exploration of language and linguistics. Amsterdam-Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing, p. 25-50.

  • Goodwin, Ch. (2000). Action and embodiment within human situated interaction. In Journal of Pragmatics, 32, p. 1489-1522.

  • Gravett, Ch. (2008). Knight noble warrior of England 1200-1600. Oxford: Osprey Publishing.

  • Halliday, M. (1978). Language as a social semiotic. London: Edward Arnold.

  • Harder, P. (2010). Meaning in mind and society: A functional contribution to the social turn in cognitive linguistics. Cognitive linguistics research [CLR]. Berlin-New York: Mouton de Gruyter.

  • Heine, B. (1997). Cognitive foundations of grammar. New York: Oxford University Press.

  • Hjelmslev, L. (1969) Prolegomena to a theory of language. Madison, Milwaukee, and London: The University of Wisconsin Press.

  • Jackendoff, R. (1983). Semantics and cognition. Cambridge: MIT Press.

  • Jackendoff, R. (2002). Foundations of language: brain, meaning, grammar, evolution. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Kennedy, B. (1992). Knighthood in the Morte Darthur, 2nd ed. Cambridge: D.S. Brewer.

  • Kennedy, E.D. (1994). The stanzaic Morte Arthur: The adaptation of a French romance for an English audience. In Culture and the king: The social implications of the Arthurian legend: essays in honor of Valerie M. Lagorio. Shichtman, M.B. & Carley, J.P. (eds.). Albany: State University of New York Press, p. 91-112.

  • Komova, T.A. (1990). Modal verb in language and discourse. Moscow: Moscow University Press. / Komova T.A. Modal’nyj glagol v yazyke i rechi. Moskva: Izdatel’stvo MGU. / Комова Т.А. Модальный глагол в языке и речи. Москва: Издательство МГУ.

  • Komova, T.A. & Sharapkova, A.A. (2017). Worthiness or nobility? Semantic changes of the category of “NOBILITY” (based on “Canterbury tales” by G. Chaucer). In Akhmanov’s readings, conference proceedings (December 23, 2016) Moscow State University, Moskva: Universitetskaja kniga, p. 44-59. / Komova T.A., Sharapkova A.A. Doblest’ ili znatnost’? Izmenenija v semantike kategorii “blagorodstvo” (na materiale “Kenterberijskikh rasskazov” Dzh. Chosera). In Akhmanovskie chtenija, materialy konferentsii (Dekabr’ 23, 2016). Moskovskij Gosudarstvennyj Universitet, Moskva: Universitetskaja kniga MAKS-press, s. 44-59. / Комова Т.А., Шарапкова А.А. Доблесть или знатность? Изменения в семантике категории “благородство” (на материале “Кентерберийских рассказов” Дж. Чосера). In Ахмановские чтения, материалы конференции (Декабрь 23, 2016) Московский Государственный Университет. Москва: Университeтcкая книга, c. 44-59.

  • Koubriakova, E.S. (1996). Concept. In A concise dictionary of cognitive terms. Koubriakova, E.S. (ed.) Moscow: Moscow University Press, p. 90-93. / Koubryakova E.S. Kontsept. In Kratkij slovar’ kognitivnykh terminov. Koubryakova E.S. (red.) Moskva: Izdatel’stvo Moskovskogo Universiteta, s. 90-93. / Кубрякова Е.С. Концепт. In Краткий словарь когнитивных терминов. Кубрякова Е.С. (ред.) Москва: Издательство МГУ, с. 90-93.

  • Koubriakova, E.S. (1978). Parts of speech in the onomasiological framework. Moscow: Nauka. / Koubryakova E.S. Chasti rechi v onomasiologicheskom osveshenii. Moscow: Nauka. / Кубрякова Е.С. Части речи в ономасиологическом освещении. Москва: Наука.

  • Lakoff, G. (1997). Women, fire, and dangerous things. What categories reveal about the mind. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

  • Levinson, S.C. (1997). From outer to inner space: Linguistic categories and non-linguistic thinking. In Language and conceptualization. Nuyts, J. & Pederson, E. (eds.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, p. 13-45.

  • Lewis, C. (1960). Studies in words. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Malory, Syr T. (1997). Le Morte Darthur. Ann Arbor, Mich.: University of Michigan Humanities. Print source: Le Morte dArthur Syr Thomas Malory, Caxton, William, ca. 1422-1491, Sommer, H.O. (ed.), b. 1861. London: David Nutt, 1889. Available at:;idno=MaloryWks2

  • Manerko, L. (2016). Towards understanding of conceptualisation in cognitive terminology. In Lege artis. Language yesterday, today, tomorrow. The journal of University of SS Cyril and Methodius in Trnava. Warsaw: De Gruyter Open, 2016, vol. I (2), December 2016, p. 129-170. DOI: 10.1515/lart-2016-0012

  • Methods of cognitive analysis of word’s semantics: Computer and corpus approaches. (2015). Zabotkina, V. (ed.). Moscow: Jazyki slavjanskoj kul’tury – translation. / Metody kognitivnogo analiza semantiki slova: kompjuterno-korpusnyj podkhod. Zabotkina V. (ed.). Moscow: Jazyki slavjanskoj kul’tury. / Методы когнитивного анализа семантики cлова: компьютерно-корпусный подход. Заботкина B.И. (ред.). Москва: Языки славянской культуры.

  • Merlin: or the early history of King Arthur: a prose romance. (1997). Wheatley, H.B. (ed.). Ann Arbor, Mich.: University of Michigan Humanities Text Initiative. Available at:;view=toc

  • Middle English Dictionary. Available at:

  • Mills, Ch. (1825). The history of chivalry or knighthood and its times. London: Longman, Hurst, Rees, Orme, Brown & Green.

  • Nazarova, T.B. (1996). Linguistic and literary semiotics. In Applied semiotics / Sémiotique appliquée, 1 (1), University of Toronto, p. 19-28.

  • Nazarova, Т.B. (1994). Philology and semiotics. Contemporary English language: A monograph. Moscow: Vysšaya škola. / Nazarova T.B. Filologiya i semiotika. Sovremennyj anglijskij jazyk: Monografiya. Moskva: Vysshaya shkola. / Назарова Т.Б. Филология и семиотика. Современный английский язык: Монография. Москва: Высшая школа.

  • Nietzsche, F. (2006). On the genealogy of morality. Keith, A. (ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Nöth, W. (2014). The growth of signs. In Sign systems studies, 42 (2/3), p. 172-192.

  • Quirk, R. & Stein, G. (1993). English in use. United Kingdom: Longman Publishers. Oxford English Dictionary. Electronic edition. Ver:

  • Potebnya, A.A. (1999). Thought and language. Moscow: Labyrinth. / Potebnja A.A. Mysl’ i jazyk. Moskva: Labirint. / Потебня А.А. Мысль и язык. Москва: Лабиринт.

  • Rundblad, G. & Kronenfeld, D. (2003). The semantic structure of lexical fields: Variation and change. In Words in time. Diachronic semantics from different points of view. Eckardt, R., Heusinger, K. von & Schwarze C. (eds.). Trends in Linguistics. Studies and Monographs, (143). Berlin-New York: Mouton de Gruyter, p. 67-114.

  • Saussure, F. de. (1959). Course in general linguistics. New York: Columbia University Press.

  • Sandor, A. (2015). Siginification, meaning, and the text level of language review and modification of Benveniste’s theory of language and language use. In Indogermanische Forschungen, 94 (1), p. 45-66.

  • The concise Oxford dictionary of English language. (1993). Hoad, T.F. (ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • The handbook of language emergence. (2015). MacWhinney, B. & O’Grady, W. (eds.). Oxford: Wiley Blackwell.

  • Toporov, V. (1995). Myth. Ritual. Symbol. Image: studies in mythopoetics. Selected papers. Moscow: Progress. / Toporov V. Mif. Ritual. Simvol. Obraz: Issledovanija v oblasti mifopojeticheskogo: Izbrannoe. Moskva: Progress. / Топоров В. Миф. Ритуал. Символ. Образ: Исследования в области мифопоэтического. Избранные труды. Москва: Прогресс.

  • Tylén, K., Fusaroli, R., Bundgaard, P.F. & Østergaard, S. (2013). Making sense together: A dynamical account of linguistic meaning-making. In Semiotica, 194, p. 39-62.

  • Uspensky, B. (1996). Semiotics of history, semiotics of culture. Selected papers. Moscow: Yazyki russkoi kultury. / Uspensky B. Semiotika istorii. Semiotika kul’tury. Izbrannyje trudy. Moskva: Yazyki russkoj kultury. / Успенский Б. Семиотика истории, семиотика культуры. Избранные труды. Москва: Языки русской культуры.

  • Vennemann, Th. (2012). Athel and its relatives: Origin and decline of a noble family of words. In English Studies, 93 (8), p. 950-986.

  • Vygotsky, L.S. (2012). Thought and language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

  • Winters, M. (2010). Introduction: On the emergence of diachronic cognitive linguistics. In Historical cognitive linguistics. Winters, M. E., Tissari, H. & Allan, K. (eds.). Berlin-New York: Walter de Gruyter, p. 3-27.

  • Zalesova, N. (2009). Formation and perception of the image of a gentleman in language and culture of the USA. Thesis for the Candidate Degree in Philology, Speciality 10.02.04 – Germanic Languages. Moscow: Moscow Lomonosov State University. / Zalesova N. Formirovanie i vosprijatie obraza dzhentel’mena v jazyke i kul’ture SShA. Dissertatsiya na soiskaniye stepeni kandidata filologicheskikh nauk. Moskva: Moskovskij gosudarstvennyj universitet. / Залесова Н. Формирование и восприятие образа джентльмена в языке и культуре США. / Диссертация на соискание степени кандидата филологических наук. / Московский государственный университет. 10.02.04 – германские языки. Москва.

  • Zlatev J., Sonesson G. & Konderak P. (2016). Introduction: Cognitive semiotics comes of age. In Meaning, mind and communication. Explorations in cognitive semiotics. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang, p. 9-31.

Lege Artis

Language yesterday, today, tomorrow

Journal Information


All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 73 73 52
PDF Downloads 10 10 8