Monomodal and multimodal instantiations of conceptual metaphors of Brexit

Open access


This article offers a linguistic analysis of the conceptual metaphors of Brexit, in which the source and the target belong to the same semiotic mode or to different ones. It is shown that the variation of high-level cognitive models underpinning metaphoric images of Brexit reflects the author’s stance towards the event. Phases of Brexit are associated with different image-schematic cognitive models, and this impinges on the range of those metaphors of Brexit that involve low-level concepts.

Adler-Nissen, R. (2016). The vocal euro-outsider: the UK in a two-speed Europe. In Political quarterly, 87 (2), p. 238-246.

Ahmed, K. (2016). What does ‘hard’ or ‘soft’ Brexit mean? Available at:

Boffey, D. (2017). Brexit divorce bill: what is it and how does it affect talks? Available at:

Brexit. (2017). Available at:

Brexit war of words heats up as ‘enemy’ EU tells Britain to pay up. (2017). Available at:

Brexit wins! Next stop: Frexit, Italexit and Swexit. (2016). Available at:

Brugman, B. (2017). Brexit: dirty, spicy or hairy? Why metaphor matter. Available at:

Carroll, N. (1994). Visual metaphor. In Aspects of metaphor. Hintikka, J. (ed.). Dordrecht: Kluwer, p. 189-218.

Castaño, C.M.D. (2013). Defining and characterizing the concept of Internet meme. In Revista CES psicología, 6 (2), p. 82-104.

Connolly, P. (2017). Bad Brexit metaphors. Available at:

Davydyuk, Yu. & Panasenko, N. (2016). Figuring the male and female: fire and water in Bradbury’s (science) fiction. In Lege artis. Language yesterday, today, tomorrow. The journal of University of SS Cyril and Methodius in Trnava. Warsaw: De Gruyter Open, I (1), June 2016, p. 4-74. Available at:

van Dijk, T.A. (2008b). Discourse and context: A sociocognitive approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

van Dijk, T.A. (2008a). Discourse and power. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

Durden, T. (2016). Why the Brits really voted “Leave” (In 3 simple cartoons). Available at:

EU divorce bill. (s.a.). Available at:

Fauconnier, G. & Turner, M. (2002). The way we think: Conceptual blending and the mind’s hidden complexities. New York: Basic Books.

Fillmore, Ch.J. (1982). Frame semantics. In Linguistics in the morning calm: (Selected papers from the SICOL 1981). The Linguistic society of Korea (ed.). Seoul: Hanshin, p. 111-138.

Forceville, C. (2009). Non-verbal and multimodal metaphor in a cognitive framework: agendas for research. In Multimodal metaphor. Forceville, Ch. & Urios-Aparisi, E. (eds.). Berlin-New York: Mouton de Gruyter, p. 19-42.

Forceville, C. (1994). Pictorial metaphor in advertisements. In Metaphor and symbolic activity, 9, p. 1-29.

Forceville, C. (1996). Pictorial metaphor in advertising. London: Routledge.

Gibbs R., Jr. (2011). Evaluating conceptual metaphor theory. In Discourse processes, 48, p. 529-562.

Grady, J. (1999). A typology of motivation for conceptual metaphor: correlation vs. resemblance. In Metaphor in cognitive linguistics. Gibbs, R., Jr. & Steen G. (eds.), Amsterdam. The Netherlands: John Benjamins, p. 79-100.

Hunt, A. & Wheeler, B. (2017). Brexit: All you need to know about Brexit. Available at:

Johnson, M. (1987). The body in the mind. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

Johnson-Laird, P.N. (1983). Mental models. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Kövecses, Z. (2017). Levels of metaphor. In Cognitive linguistics, 28 (2), p. 209-370.

Kövecses, Z. (2002). Metaphor: A practical introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Lakoff, G. (1987). Women, fire and dangerous things: What categories reveal about the mind. Chicago-London: The University of Chicago Press.

Lakoff, G. & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago-London: The University of Chicago Press.

Lakoff, G. & Johnson, M. (1999). Philosophy in the flesh: The embodied mind and its challenge to Eastern thought. New York: Basic Books.

Lakoff, G. & Turner, M. (1989). More than cool reason: A field guide to poetic metaphor. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

Landale, J. (2017). Brexit means what? Time for the metaphors to stop. Available at:

Langacker, R.W. (1987). Foundations of cognitive grammar. Vol. I: Theoretical Prerequisites. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

Lecheler, S. (2014). Book review: Memes in digital culture by Limor Shifman. Available at:

Lemke, J.L. (2002). Travels in hypermodality. In Visual communication, 1 (3), p. 299-325.

McLuhan, M. (1994). Understanding media: the extension of man. Cambridge: MIT Press.

McNeill, D. (2005). Gesture and thought. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Metaphor and gesture. (2008). Cienki, A. & Müller, C. (eds.). Amsterdam-Philadelphia: John Benjamins.

McNeill, D. (1992). Hand and mind: What gestures reveal about thought. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Mittelberg, I. & Waugh, L.R. (2009). Metonymy first, metaphor second: A cognitive-semiotic approach to multimodal figures of speech in co-speech gesture. In Multimodal metaphor. Forceville, C. & Urios-Aparisi, E. (eds.). Berlin-New York: Mouton de Gruyter, p. 329-356.

Morozova, O. (2017). Transparency across semiotic modes: An ecological stance. In Language – literature – the arts: A cognitive-semiotic interface. Chrzanowska-Kluczewska, E. & Vorobyova, O. (eds.). Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang, p.49-68.

Musolff, A. (2017). Truths, lies, and figurative scenarios: metaphors at the heart of Brexit. In Journal of language and politics. Available at:

Nye, J.S., Jr. (2005). Soft power: the means to success in world politics. New York: Public Affairs.

Oxford dictionaries word of the year 2016. Available at:

Oxford English dictionary. Available at:

Ruiz de Mendoza, F.J. & Galera Masegosa, A. (2014). Cognitive modeling. A linguistic perspective. Amsterdam-Philadelphia: John Benjamins.

Ruiz de Mendoza, F.J. & Galera Masegosa, A. (2011). The contemporary theory of metaphor: Myths, developments and challenges. In Metaphor and symbol, 26, p.1-25.

Sia partners (2016). BREXIT OR BREMAIN: A major difference for the powerhorse called European Union? Available at:

Shifman, L. (2013). Memes in digital culture. Harvard, Mass.: The MIT Press. Shutterstock. (2016). Available at: (2016). Available at:

Tempest, M. (2017). Oxford English dictionary: the man who coined ‘Brexit’ first appeared on EURACTIVE blog. Available at:

The Guardian. (2016-2017). Available at:

Thrower, M. (2017). Brexit is not a poker game: How political metaphors mislead us. Available at:

Uberman, A. (2016). Death in metaphorical language. In Lege artis: Language yesterday, today, tomorrow. The journal of University of SS Cyril and Methodius in Trnava. Warsaw: De Gruyter Open, I (2), December 2016, p. 171-211. Available at:

UK flag separating from European Union flag. (2017). Available at:

Usherwood, S. (2017). Three unhelpful metaphors for understanding Brexit. Available at:

United Kingdom withdrawal from the European Union / Brexit. Available at:

Whitman, R.G. (2016). Brexit or Bremain: what future for the UK’s European diplomatic strategy? In International affairs, 92 (3), p. 509-529.

Zbikowski, L. (2009). Music, language, and multimodal metaphor. In Multimodal metaphor. Forceville, C., Urio-Apparisi, E. (eds.). Berlin-New York: Mouton de Gruyter, p. 359-381.

Zhabotynska, S.A. (2010). Principles of building conceptual models for thesaurus dictionaries. In Когніція, комунікація, дискурс, 1, p. 75-92.

Zheltukhina, M.R., Krasavsky, N.A., Ponomarenko, E.B., Aleshchanova, I.V. & Pavlov, P.V. (2016). Political Facebook posts using ideological symbols for media image designing of Russia as enemy. In International journal of environmental and science education, 11 (18), p. 12005-12013.

Lege Artis

Language yesterday, today, tomorrow

Journal Information

Cited By


All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 416 416 34
PDF Downloads 161 161 27