Smart Simulation for Decision Support at Headquarters

Open access

Abstract

While serious games are being widely adopted by NATO and partner nations, their use is currently limited to training and operations planning. In this paper, we explore new methods that use simulations for decision support during the execution of military operations. During this phase, the commander makes decisions based on knowledge of the situation and the primary objectives. We propose here to take a simulation containing smart and autonomous units, and use it to create new kinds of decision support tools capable of improving situation awareness, and consequently the quality of decisions. The breakthrough behind this initiative is the realization that we can provide HQ decision makers with access to a version of the information that smart simulated units use to make decisions. To ensure the approach was sound we first studied decision-making processes, and analyzed how situation awareness improves decision-making. After analysis of the decision-making processes at various headquarters, and the types of decision criteria employed, we are able to produce innovative information, computed by the simulation, and fed by the command and control system. We then propose a prerequisite architecture and describe the first results of our proof of concept work based on the SWORD (Simulation War gaming for Operational Research and Doctrine) simulation.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • [1] Simon H. A Administrative behavior Cambridge UnivPress 1965.

  • [2] Mora M. Forgionne G. Gupta J. Cervantes F. & Gelman O. A framework to assess intelligent decision-making support systems. In: Knowledge-Based Intelligent Information and Engineering Systems p. 63 2003.

  • [3] Mora M. Forgionne G. Gupta J. Cervantes F. & Gelman O. A framework to assess intelligent decision-making support systems. In: Knowledge-Based Intelligent Information and Engineering Systems pp. 59-60 2003.

  • [4] Endsley M. R. “Toward a Theory of Situation Awareness in Dynamic Systems” In: Human Factors 37.1 32–64 1995.

  • [5] Auger Gouin Roy & DRDC Valcartier Decision Support and knowledge exploitation technologies for C4ISR 2006.

  • [6] Maess P. Artificial life meets entertainment: Life like autonomous agents Communications of the ACM Vol. 38 No. 11 pp. 108-114 1995.

  • [7] Boyd John R. The Essence of Winning and Losing 28 June 1995 available at http://www.danford.net/boyd/essence.htm.

  • [8] Chen Miao Zhu Qiuming and Chen Zhengxin An Integrated Interactive Environment for Knowledge Discovery from Heterogeneous Data Resources Journal of Information & Software Technology 43 1 July 2001.

  • [9] Davis K. Paul Kulick Jonathan and Egner Michael Implications of Modern Decision Science for Military Decision-Support Systems Santa Monica: RAND Corporation 2005.

  • [10] Général Loup Francart La maîtrise de l’information Doctrines 2000.

  • [11] Grund C.G. Meier M.C. Towards Game-based Management Decision Support: Using Serious Games to Improve the Decision Process 2016.

  • [12] Leifler Ola Affordances and Constraints of Intelligent Decision Support for Military Command and Control - Three Case Studies of Support Systems Linköping University 2011.

  • [13] Petrov V. Plamen Zhu Qiuming Hicks D. Jeffrey and Stoyen D. Alexander A Hierarchical Collective Agents Network for Real-time Sensor Fusion and Decision Support” in AAAI Workshop Technical Report WS-02-15 Menlo Park: AAAI Press 2002.

  • [14] Russel Norvig Artificial intelligence – A modern approach Prentice Hall 1995.

  • [15] Tolk Andreas Decision Support Systems – Technical Prerequisites and Military Requirements in Command and Control Research and Technology Symposium Proceeding June 2000 available at http://arxiv.org.

Search
Journal information
Target audience: researchers in the fields of political and financial law
Metrics
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 24 24 12
PDF Downloads 20 20 6