The attention still enjoyed today by Aeneas’ treatise on how to withstand a siege is not merely due to its antiquity. Many of the military principles and practical instructions it conveys are still valid. In addition to these, a closer examination opens a broader insight into the Greek city of the fourth century BC than that for which the manual was originally designed, for scholars found many interesting historical, political, social, ethnographic, and linguistic aspects scattered throughout the text. The aim of this paper is firstly, to emphasize the way in which the ideas and instructions of Aeneas Tacticus are articulated in a rigorous and clear plan and, secondly, to draw attention to some of the issues which are not specific to the military, but began to be considered relevant to the overall picture of the treatise.
 Aeneas Tacticus, Asclepiodotus, Onasander, Translated by Illinois Greek Club, Loeb Classical Library, Cambridge MA, Harvard University Press, 1986, p. 5, note 4.
 Fischer, Herbert, Quaestiones Aeneanae. Pars I, Dresdae, ex officina Teubneriana, MCMXI, Appendix, p. 66.
 Méridier, Louis, Herbert Fischer. Quaestiones Aeneanae, pars I, Revue des Études Grecques, tome 28, fascicule 126, 1915, pp. 66-67 http://www.persee.fr/doc/reg_0035-039_1915_num_28_126_6830_t1_0066_0000_4
 Hudson Williams, T., The Authorship of the Greek Military Manual Attributed to 'Aeneas Tacticus', The American Journal of Philology, Vol. 25, No. 4 (1904), pp. 390-405.
 Hunter, L. W., Fischer’s Quaestiones Aeneanae, The Classical Review, Vol. XXVIII, No. 5, 1914, pp. 169-170.
 Aeneae Tactici Commentarius de toleranda obsidione, Graece ad codices Mss. Parisienses et Mediceum recensuit, versionem Latinam et commentarium integrum Is. Casauboni, Notas Iac. Gronovii, G. H. Koesii Caspari Orellii aliorumque et suas adiecit Io. Conradus Orellius, Lipsiae, in Libraria Weidmannia, MDCCCXVIII, Praefatio, p. 8.