Introduction: Pacemaker implantation is the only effective symptomatic treatment for life-threatening bradyarrhythmias. Major complications observed after implantation of cardiac pacemakers include lead dislocation, loss of pulse generator function, and inadequate stimulation. The aim of this retrospective single-centre study was to analyse the indications for pacemaker implantation and the incidence and types of complications associated with this procedure in dogs treated for symptomatic bradyarrhythmia.
Material and Methods: The retrospective analysis included 31 dogs with symptomatic bradyarrhythmia, implanted with permanent cardiac pacemakers in 1992–2017. The list of analysed variables included patient age, breed, sex, indication for pacemaker implantation, comorbidities, and the incidence of procedure-related complications along with the type thereof.
Results: The most common indication for pacemaker implantation was 3rd degree AVB, followed by SSS, advanced 2nd degree AVB, and PAS. Pacemaker implantation was associated with a 35% overall complication rate and 6.45% periprocedural mortality. There were no significant differences in terms of procedure-related complications with regard to age, sex, breed, indications for pacemaker implantation, or comorbidities.
Conclusions: Cardiac pacing is the only effective treatment of symptomatic bradycardia, but as an invasive procedure, may pose a risk of various complications, including death.
1. Achen S.E., Miller M.W., Nelson D.A., Gordon S.G., Drourr L.T.: Late cardiac perforation by a passive-fixation permanent pacemaker lead in a dog. J Am Vet Med Assoc 2008, 233, 1291–1296.
2. Bedoya Nader G., Kellihan H.B., Bjorling D.E., McAnulty J.: Pyloric obstruction secondary to epicardial pacemaker implantation: a case report. J Vet Cardiol 2017, 19, 95–98.
3. Bonagura J.D., Helphrey M.L., Muir W.W.: Complications associated with permanent pacemaker implantation in the dog. J Am Vet Med Assoc 1983, 182, 149–155.
4. Bright J.M., Cali J.V.: Clinical usefulness of cardiac event recording in dogs and cats examined because of syncope, episodic collapse, or intermittent weakness: 60 cases (1997–1999;). J Am Vet Med Assoc 2000, 216, 1110–1114.
5. Calkins H., Shyr Y., Frumin H., Schork A., Morady F.: The value of the clinical history in the differentiation of syncope due to ventricular tachycardia, atrioventricular block, and neurocardiogenic syncope. Am J Med 1995, 98, 365–373.
6. Ciavarella A., Nimmo J., Hambrook L.: Pacemaker lead perforation of the right ventricle associated with Moraxella phenylpyruvica infection in a dog. Aust Vet J 2016, 94, 101–106.
7. Cunningham S.M., Ames M.K., Rush J.E., Rozanski E.A.: Successful treatment of pacemaker-induced stricture and thrombosis of the cranial vena cava in two dogs by use of anticoagulants and balloon venoplasty. J Am Vet Med Assoc 2009, 15, 235, 1467–1473.
8. Domenech O., Santilli R., Pradelli D., Bussadori C.: The implantation of a permanent transvenous endocardial pacemaker in 42 dogs: a retrospective study. Med Sci Monit 2005, 11, 168–175.
9. Genovese D.W., Estrada A.H., Maisenbacher H.W., Heatwole B.A., Powell M.A.: Procedure times, complication rates, and survival times associated with single-chamber versus dual-chamber pacemaker implantation in dogs with clinical signs of bradyarrhythmia: 54 cases (2004–2009). J Am Vet Med Assoc 2013, 15, 242, 230–236.
10. Hildebrandt N., Stertmann W.A., Wehner M., Schneider I., Neu H., Schneider M.: Dual chamber pacemaker implantation in dogs with atrioventricular block. J Vet Intern Med 2009, 23, 31–38.
11. Johnson M.S., Martin M.W., Henley W.: Results of pacemaker implantation in 104 dogs. J Small Anim Pract 2007, 48, 4–11.
12. Kaneshige T., Machida N., Yamamoto S., Nakao S., Yamane Y.: A histological study of the cardiac conduction system in canine cases of mitral valve endocardiosis with complete atrioventricular block. J Comp Pathol 2007, 136, 120–126.
14. Lichtenberger J., Scollan K.F., Bulmer B.J., Sisson D.D.: Long-term outcome of physiologic VDD pacing versus non-physiologic VVI pacing in dogs with high-grade atrioventricular block. J Vet Cardiol 2015, 17, 42–53.
15. MacKie B.A., Stepien R.L., Kellihan H.B.: Retrospective analysis of an implantable loop recorder for evaluation of syncope, collapse, or intermittent weakness in 23 dogs (2004–2008). J Vet Cardiol 2010, 12, 25–33.
16. Moneva-Jordan A., Corcoran B.M., French A., Dukes-McEwan J., Martin M.W., Luis Fuentes V., Hitchcock L.S., Bonagura J.D.: Sick sinus syndrome in nine West Highland white terriers. Vet Rec 2001, 148, 142–147.
17. Mulz J.M., Kraus M.S., Thompson M., Flanders J.A.: Cranial vena caval syndrome secondary to central venous obstruction associated with a pacemaker lead in a dog. J Vet Cardiol 2010, 12, 217–223.
18. Noszczyk-Nowak A., Michałek M., Kałuża E., Cepiel A., Pasławska U.: Prevalence of arrhythmias in dogs examined between 2008 and 2014. J Vet Res 2017, 61, 103–110.
19. Oyama M.A., Sisson D.D., Lehmkuhl L.B.: Practices and outcome of artificial cardiac pacing in 154 dogs. J Vet Intern Med 2001, 15, 229–239.
20. Palmer K.G., King L.G., Van Winkle T.J.: Clinical manifestations and associated disease syndromes in dogs with cranial vena cava thrombosis: 17 cases (1989–1996). J Am Vet Med Assoc 1998, 213, 220–224.
21. Pasławska U., Noszczyk-Nowak A., Okręglicka E., Nicpoń J.: Analysis of arrhythmia of the heart in dogs examined between 1996–2001 in the Clinic of Horse, Dog, and Cat Diseases at the Faculty of Veterinary Medicine of Wrocław Agricultural University. Med Weter 2004, 11, 1191–1195.
22. Pasławska U., Zyśko D., Gajek J., Noszczyk-Nowak A., Nicpoń J.: Causes and diagnostics of fainting. Med Wet 2005, 61, 253–256.
23. Sanchis-Mora S., Viscasillas J., Mathis A., Palacios C., Brodbelt D.C., Alibhai H.I.: Anaesthetic management and complications of pacemaker implantation in dogs. Vet Rec 2014, 175, 303.
24. Santilli R.A., Porteiro Vázquez D.M., Vezzosi T., Perego M.: Long-term intrinsic rhythm evaluation in dogs with atrioventricular block. J Vet Intern Med 2016, 30, 58–62.
25. Sisson D., Thomas W.P., Woodfield J., Pion P.D., Luethy M., DeLellis L.A.: Permanent transvenous pacemaker implantation in forty dogs. J Vet Intern Med 1991, 5, 322–331.
26. Van De Wiele C.M., Hogan D.F., Green H.W. III, Parnell N.K.: Cranial vena caval syndrome secondary to transvenous pacemaker implantation in two dogs. J Vet Cardiol 2008, 10, 155–161.
27. Visser L.C., Keene B.W., Mathews K.G., Browne W.J., Chanoit G.: Outcomes and complications associated with epicardial pacemakers in 28 dogs and 5 cats. Vet Surg 2013, 42, 544–550.
28. Ward J.L., De Francesco T.C., Tou S.P., Atkins C.E., Griffith E.H., Keene B.W.: Complication rates associated with transvenous pacemaker implantation in dogs with high-grade atrioventricular block performed during versus after normal business hours. J Vet Intern Med 2015, 29, 157–163.
29. Weder C., Monnet E., Ames M., Bright J.: Permanent dual chamber epicardial pacemaker implantation in two dogs with complete atrioventricular block. J Vet Cardiol 2015, 17, 154–160.
30. Wess G., Thomas W.P., Berger D.M., Kittleson M.D.: Applications, complications, and outcomes of transvenous pacemaker implantation in 105 Dogs (1997–2002). J Vet Intern Med 2006, 20, 877–884.