Scholars, psychologists, and teachers from around the world have been dealing with the topic of giftedness for many years. Also in Slovakia, development of giftedness is a highly topical issue and gifted education has earned its place in the current curricular documents issued by the Ministry of Education. The national curriculum specifies education objectives, teaching plans, requirements for personnel, organizational and material-technological requirements for gifted education. However, the personnel requirements are problematic not only in Slovakia, but also in other countries. Most attention is paid to identification and development of gifted children, but very little consideration is given to the training of teachers for gifted children. The lack of justifying teacher training does not guarantee sustainability of gifted education. The aim of this paper is to map and describe gifted education, teacher training programs and qualifications for teachers of intellectually gifted pupils in Slovakia, Austria, Belgium and Finland. These countries were chosen because of very different perceptions of the gifted education and teacher training. These systems are compared and a proposal for sustainable teacher training is offered.
Dočkal, V. (2005). Zaměreěno na talenty, aneb, Nadání má každý. Praha: Nakladatelství Lidové noviny.
Duchovičová, J. & Babulicová, Z. (2010). Possibilities for education of gifted pupils in integrated conditions as a way towards educational inclusion. In: Teacher training and development – scientific approach to didactics and method of teaching. Užice: University of Kragujevac.
Flores, M.A., Santos, P., Fernandes, S., Pereira, D. (2014). Pre-service teachers’ views of their training: Key issues to sustain quality teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education for Sustainability, 16(2), 39–53.
Gadušová Z., Hašková A., Malá E., Munková D. (2013) Technology of education: Terminology in use. Praha: Verbum.
Gedzune, G. (2015). Awakening pre-service teachers to childrenis social exclusion in the classroom. Discourse and Communication for Sustainable Education, 6(1), 95–109.
Hanesová, D. (2015). Searching of ways of effective plurilingual teacher trainees preparation. Slavonic pedagogical studies journal: the scientific educational journal, 4(2), 220–240.
Iliško, D. (2007). Teachers as agents of societal change. Journal of Teacher Education for Sustainability, 7, 14–26.
Iliško, D., Skrinda, A., Mičule, I. (2014). Envisioning the future: Bachelor’s and master’s degree students’ perspectives. Journal of Teacher Education for Sustainability, 16(2), 88–102.
Kabadayi, A. (2016). A suggested in-service training model based on Turkish preschool teachers’ conceptions for sustainable development. Journal of Teacher Education for Sustainability, 18(1), 5–15.
Pipere, A., Veisson, M., Salite, I. (2015). Developing research in teacher education for sustainability: Un DESD via the journal of teacher education for sustainability. Journal of Teacher Education for Sustainability. 17 (2), 5–43.
Porubská, G. (1997). Príprava učitel’ov pre prácu s nadanými žiakmi. In: Premeny výchovy v škole a rodine. Nitra: UKF.
Reid, E. (2014). Challenges of teaching English to gifted children. Hradec Králové Journal of Anglophone Studies, 2(1), 104–113.
Reid, E., Boettger, H. (2015). Gifted education in various countries of Europe. Slavonic Pedagogical Studies Journal: The Scientific Educational Journal, 4(2), 158–171.
Redman, E. (2013). Opportunities and challenges for integrating sustainability education into k-12 Schools: Case study phoenix, AZ. Journal of Teacher Education for Sustainability, 15(2), 5–24.
Soobik, M. (2014). Teaching methods influencing the sustainability of the teaching process in technology education in general education schools. Journal of Teacher Education for Sustainability, 16(1), 89–101.