Interplay of Rhizome and Education for Sustainable Development

Open access

Abstract

One of the central challenges within education for sustainable development (ESD) is in empowering learners to reframe mindsets, particularly those that result in unsustainable behaviours and/or actions. This paper introduces the concept of rhizome articulated by Deleuze and Guattari (1987) and proposes that it can act as a framework for re-conceptualising processes of ESD. Key constructs within the rhizome, such as assemblages, nomadism, war machines and lines of flights, are discussed to highlight their relevance to ESD. The principles of the rhizome (connection, heterogeneity, multiplicity, signifying rupture, cartography and decalcomania) are then examined in the context of six processes necessary for effective ESD outlined by Tilbury (2011), namely, collaboration, dialogue, ‘whole system’ engagement, innovation within curricula, teaching and learning and active and participatory learning. The final section critically considers how this weaving of rhizomatic principles with the processes of ESD impacts on educating for sustainability. The rhizome has the potential to inspire educators and learners alike to become more critically aware of the interconnectivity and disruptive influences within sustainability. In this regard, the discussion ends by concluding that the reconceptualisation of ESD as rhizome or rhizomatic can foster an ontological shift towards perceiving the nature of reality as complex interconnected multiplicities.

Avolos, B., & Winslade, J. (2010). Education as a ‘line of flight. Explorations: An E-Journal of Narrative Practice, 1, 70–77.

Barber, B., & Rousseau, L. (2013). The living home: Building it into the curriculum. In L. F. Johnston (Eds.), Higher education for sustainability: Cases, challenges, and opportunities from across the curriculum (pp. 169–182). New York: Routledge.

Bradbear, N. (2009). Bees and their role in forest livelihoods: A guide to the services provided by bees and the sustainable harvesting, processing and marketing of their products. Retrieved July 29, 2014, from ftp://ftp.fao.org/docrep/fao/012/i0842e/i0842e00.pdf

Breidlid, A. (2013). Education, indigenous knowledges, and development in the global south. New York: Routledge.

Bruskotter, J. T., Hitzhusen, G. E., Wilson, R. S., & Zwickle, A. (2013). Understanding student environmental interests when designing multidisciplinary curricula. In L. F. Johnston (Eds.), Higher education for sustainability: Cases, challenges, and opportunities from across the curriculum (pp. 29–44). New York: Routledge.

Carp, R. M. (2013). Toward a resilient academy. In L. F. Johnston (Eds.), Higher education for sustainability: Cases, challenges, and opportunities from across the curriculum (pp. 223–237). New York: Routledge.

César Manrique Foundation. (2014). Biography. Available from http://www.cesarmanrique.com/biografia_i.htm

Chandra, D. V. (2014). Re-examining the importance of indigenous perspectives in the western environmental education for sustainability: “From tribal to mainstream education”. Journal of Teacher Education for Sustainability, 16(1), 117–127.

Cilliers, P. (2005). Complexity, deconstruction and relativism. Theory, Culture & Society, 22(5), 255–267.

Clarke, P. (2012). Education for sustainability: Becoming naturally smart. New York: Routledge.

Dawson, A. (2013). Introduction to focus: Apocalypse now. American Book Review, 34(2), 3.

DeLanda, M. (2006). A new philosophy of society: Assemblage theory and social complexity. London: Bloomsbury.

Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (1987). A thousand plateaus: Capitalism and schizophrenia. Minneapolis, MN: The University of Minnesota Press.

Deuchars, R. (2011). Creating lines of flight and activating resistance: Deleuze and Guattari’s war machine. Retrieved, August 3, 2014, from http://www.victoria.ac.nz/atp/articles/pdf/Deuchars-2011.pdf

Escrigas, C., Granados Sanchez, J., Hall, B., & Tandon, R. (2014). Editors’ introduction: Knowledge, engagement and higher education contributing to social change. In Global University Network for Innovation (Eds.), Higher education in the world: Knowledge, engagement and higher education: Contributing to social change (pp. xxxi–xxxix) Basingstoke: Palgrave, MacMillan.

Farrell, J. J. (2013). The moral ecology of everyday life. In L. F. Johnston (Eds.), Higher education for sustainability: Cases, challenges, and opportunities from across the curriculum (pp. 154–168). New York: Routledge.

Guattari, F. (1989). The three ecologies. New Formations, 8, 131–147.

Huckle, J., & Sterling, S. (1996). Education for sustainability. London: Earthscan Routledge.

Le Grange, L. (2011). Sustainability and higher education: From arborescent to rhizomatic thinking. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 43(7), 742–754.

Nikolopoulou, A., Abraham, T., & Mirbagheri, F. (2010). Education for sustainable development: Challenges, strategies and practices in a globalizing world. New Delhi: SAGE Publications India Pvt Ltd.

Pigem, J. (2007) (Ed.). Faith-based organizations and education for sustainability. Retrieved July 25, 2014, from http://www.arcworld.org/downloads/Barcelona%20Report.pdf

Tilbury, D. (2011) Education for sustainable development: An expert review on processes and learning for ESD. Retrieved July 20, 2014, from http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0019/001914/191442e.pdf

Vitali, S., Glattfelder, J. B., & Battiston, S. (2011). The network of global corporate control. Plos ONE, 6(10), 1–6.

Wals, A. E. J. (2012). Shaping the education of tomorrow: 2012 full-length report on the UN decade of Education for Sustainable Development. Retrieved August 5, 2014, from http://www.desd.org/UNESCO%20report.pdf

Wals, A. E. J. (2014). Sustainability in higher education in the context of the UN DESD: A review of learning and institutionalization processes. Journal of Cleaner Production, 62, 8–15.

Wright, A. (2010). Backpack-wearing cockroaches to detect radiation. National Defense, 94(676), 17.

Journal of Teacher Education for Sustainability

The Journal of UNESCO Chair on the Interplay of Tradition and Innovation in Education for Sustainable Development (ESD) at Daugavpils University, Latvia

Journal Information


CiteScore 2018: 1.65

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2018: 0.255
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2018: 1.496

Cited By

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 229 162 10
PDF Downloads 105 82 12