A (Western) school is, among other things, a building with its own spatial formations and boundaries. In educational settings, the place for learning, as well as the human body in the place, is significant. In this paper, we explore the theory of the lived body as it was formulated by Maurice Merleau-Ponty and argue why we think this theory can be used fruitfully in educational research, and specifically in a study of learning places such as classrooms. We also discuss what a classroom is and can be drawing upon the work of Otto Friedrich Bollnow.
As humans, we access the world through our bodies and the knowledge we develop is always embodied. The body and the world are two aspects of a reversibility, which Merleau-Ponty terms flesh. He also stresses that the body inhabits the world, and our corporeality can therefore be tied to the room-we are affected by and affect the room in a mutual interplay.
In this paper, we develop this further and argue that teachers and students inhabit the classroom. Corporeality is therefore closely connected to spatiality and is understood as a prerequisite for being involved in relationships. We argue for the importance of exploring the notion of embodiment in educational settings with a special focus on the embodied classroom using the phenomenology of the life-world
Alerby, E. (2004). Windows of the school. Some notes on the significance of the source of daylight in school. Paper presented at NERA’s Congress, Reykjavik, Iceland, March 11-13.
Alerby, E. (2009). Knowledge as a ‘body run’. Learning of writing as embodied experience in accordance with Merleau-Ponty’s theory of the lived body. Indo-Pacific Journal of Phenomenology, 9 (1), 1-8.
Alerby, E., Bengtsson, J., Hörnqvist, M-L., & Kroksmark, T. (2002). Reflections on the signification of space in school from a life-world approach. EERA conference, Lisbon, Portugal, September 11-14 2002.
Alerby, E., Hertting, K. & Westman, S. (2012) Beyond the boundaries of the classroom: rethinking places for learning. Paper presented at 42nd Annual Conference of the Philosophy of Education Society of Australasia Inc. 7-10 Dec. 2012.
Alerby, E., & Hörnqvist, M-L. (2005). Reflections from a school on a school. Reflective Practice, 6 (2), 315-321.
Barbaras, R. (2004). The being of the phenomenon: Merleau-Ponty’s ontology. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
Barbaras, R. (2006). Desire and distance: introduction to a phenomenology of perception. Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press.
Bollnow, O.F. (1994). Vara-i-rum och ha-rum. [Mensch und Raum] Nordisk Arkitekturforskning, 7 (1), 111-119.
Bonnett, M. (2009). Education and selfhood: A phenomenological investigation. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 43 (3), 357-370.
Bonnett, M. (2013). Sustainable development, environmental education, and the significance of being in place. Curriculum Journal, 24 (2), 250-271.
Dall’Alba, G., & Barnacle, R. (2005). Embodied knowing in online environments. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 37 (5), 719-744.
Dall’Alba, G., & Barnacle, R. (2007). An ontological turn for higher education. Studies in Higher Education, 32 (6), 679-691.
de Jong, M. (1997). Spatial structure and use of school buildings. Evolving Environmental Ideals. Changing Ways of Life, Values and Design Practices. Book of proceedings, Stockholm, July 30-August 3, 1996.
Eriksen, A. (1996). Skolen som et lærested og et værested. [School as a learning place and a being place. Dafolo Forlag.
Gruenevald, D.A. (2003). Foundations of place: A multidisciplinary framework for place-conscious aducation. American Educational Research Journal, 40 (3), 619-654.
Langeveld, M.J. (1983). The stillness of the secret place. Phenomenology + Pedagogy, 1(1), 11-17.
Merriam-Webster (2013). An Encyklopedia Britannica Company. Retrieved, September, 5, 2013 from: www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/incorporate Merleau-Ponty, M. (1964). The primacy of perception. Chicago: Northwestern UniversityPress.
Merleau-Ponty, M., & Lefort, C. (1968). The visible and the invisible: Followed by working notes [Visible et l’invisible.]. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.
Merleau-Ponty, M. (1982). Sense and non-sense. Evanston: Northwestern Univ. Press.
Merleau-Ponty, M. (2000). Humanism and terror: The communist problem. New Brunswick, N.J.: Transaction.
Merleau-Ponty, M. (2002). Phenomenology of perception [Phénoménologie de la perception]. London; New York: Routledge.Nationalencyklopedin (1998). Multimedia 2.0 for PC. Höganäs: Bokförlaget Bra Böcker AB.
Patočka, J. (1998). Body, community, language, world. Chicago, Ill.: Open Court.
Westman, S., & Alerby, E. (2012). Rethinking temporality in education drawing upon the philosophies of Merleau-Ponty and Deleuze: A chiasmic be(com)ing. Childhood & Philosophy, 8 (16), 355-377.
Villanen, H., & Alerby, E. (2013). The sense of place - voices from a schoolyard. Education in the North, 20, 26-38.
Skantze, A. (1989). Vad betyder skolhuset? Skolans fysiska miljö ur elevernas perspektiv studerad i relation till barns och ungdomars utvecklingsuppgifter. [What is the significance of the school building: The physical environment of the school seen from a pupil perspective and studied in relation to their developmental tasks] Stockholm: Pedagogiska institutionen, Stockholms universitet.
Stahle, O. (1999). Förordet i: Arkitektur och skola: om att planera skolhus. [Preface in: Architecture and school. How to design school buildings]. Stockholm: Stiftelsen ARKUS.