Consistent Multivariate Seasonal Adjustment for Gross Domestic Product and its Breakdown in Expenditures

Open access


Seasonally adjusted series of Gross Domestic Product (GDP) and its breakdown in underlying categories or domains are generally not consistent with each other. Statistical differences between the total GDP and the sum of the underlying domains arise for two reasons. If series are expressed in constant prices, differences arise due to the process of chain linking. These differences increase if, in addition, a univariate seasonal adjustment, with for instance X-13ARIMA-SEATS, is applied to each series separately. In this article, we propose to model the series for total GDP and its breakdown in underlying domains in a multivariate structural time series model, with the restriction that the sum over the different time series components for the domains are equal to the corresponding values for the total GDP. In the proposed procedure, this approach is applied as a pretreatment to remove outliers, level shifts, seasonal breaks and calendar effects, while obeying the aforementioned consistency restrictions. Subsequently, X-13ARIMA-SEATS is used for seasonal adjustment. This reduces inconsistencies remarkably. Remaining inconsistencies due to seasonal adjustment are removed with a benchmarking procedure.

Bloem, A., R. Dippelsman, and N. Maehle. 2001. Quarterly National Accounts Manual–Concepts, Data sources and Compilation. Washington D.C. IMF. Available at: (accessed January 2019).

Di Fonzo, T. and M. Marini. 2011. “Simultaneous and Two-step Reconciliation of Systems of Time Series: Methodological and Practical Issues.” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society C (Applied Statistics) 60. Part 2, 143–164. Doi:

Doornik, J.A. 2009. An Object-oriented Matrix Programming Language Ox 6. London: Timberlake Consultants Press.

Doran, H.E. 1992. “Constraining Kalman Filter and Smoothing Estimates to Satisfy Time Varying Restrictions.” Review in Economics and Statistics 74: 568–572. Doi:

Durbin, J. and S.J. Koopman. 2012. Time Series Analysis By State Space Methods (Second Edition). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Eurostat. 2015. ESS Guidelines on Seasonal Adjustment (2015 Edition). Luxembourg: European Union. Available at: (accessed January 2019).

Grudkowska, S. 2015. JDemetra and User Guide. Warsaw: National Bank of Poland, Department of Statistics. Available at: (accessed January 2019).

Harvey, A.C. 1989. Forecasting, Structural Time Series Models and the Kalman Filter. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Harvey, J.A. and S.J. Koopman. 1992. “Diagnostic Checking of Unobserved Components Time Series Models.” Journal of Business and Economic Statistics 10: 377–389. Doi:

Koopman, S.J., N. Shephard, and J.A. Doornik. 1999. “Statistical Algorithms for Models in State Space Form Using Ssfpack 2.2.” Econometrics Journal 2: 107–160. Doi:

Koopman, S.J., N. Shephard, and J.A. Doornik. 2008. SsfPack 3.0: Statistical Algorithms for Models in State Space Form. London: Timberlake Consultants Press.

Ladiray, D. and B. Quenneville. 2001. Seasonal Adjustment with the X-11 Method. New York: Springer-Verlag.

Quenneville, B. and S. Fortier. 2006. “Balancing Seasonally Adjusted Series as a Complement to the Direct and Indirect Approaches to Seasonal Adjustment.” Proc. Bus. Econ. Statist. Sect. Am. Statist. Ass.: 1118–1125.

U.S. Census Bureau. 2015. X-13ARIMA-SEATS Reference Manual, Version 1.1. Washington, D.C: U.S. Census Bureau. Available at: (accessed January 2019).

Journal of Official Statistics

The Journal of Statistics Sweden

Journal Information

IMPACT FACTOR 2017: 0.662
5-year IMPACT FACTOR: 1.113

CiteScore 2017: 0.74

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2017: 1.158
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2017: 0.860


All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 139 139 139
PDF Downloads 143 143 143